Cited by 221Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Toward the Development of the Stereotypic Roles for Black Women Scale

Thomas, Anita Jones, Witherspoon, Karen McCurtis, Speight, Suzette L.·2004·Journal of Black Psychology

Abstract

Preliminary findings on the validation of the Stereotypic Roles for Black Women Scale (SRBWS) are presented. A sample of 186 African American women took the SRBWS along with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and the Racial Identity Attitude Scale–B. A confirmatory factor analysis supported a four-factor structure of the scale, and moderate reliability estimates were found for each of the interrelated but distinct subscales. Stepwise regression analyses revealed that Mammy and Sapphire images were significant predictors of self-esteem scores and that the internalized stereotypic roles contributed unique variance over racial identity attitudes in understanding self-esteem in Black women. Suggestions for future research and validation of the SRBWS are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0095798404266061

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomas, A. J., Witherspoon, K. M., & Speight, S. L.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern Illinois University (US)
  • Chicago State University (US)
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
Venue
Journal of Black Psychology
Published
2004-08
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
426-442
ISSN
  • 0095-7984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4558
OpenAlex
W2109669216
Cited by
221
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
10.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Black Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
internalized racism, racial stereotypes, self-esteem, racial identity attitudes, African American women, scale validation, factor structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review