Situating Reader Stance Within and Beyond the Efferent–Aesthetic Continuum
Abstract
The purpose of this theoretical essay is to encourage critical reflection of the relationship of specific reading events to traditional conceptualizations of reader stance. While conventional models of reader stance are useful for considering many aspects of reading, there are reading events that engender stances that appear to lie outside of the parameters of these traditional conceptualizations. In this article, we identify one such reading event, termed reading-for-the-writer, and analyze the specific point it occupies on an efferent-aesthetic continuum, a continuum that we view as more three-dimensional than linear and that includes both reader stances and writer stances. Through such analyses of specific stances, we conclude with pedagogical implications and research directions that move toward continued discussion of the interconnectedness of reading and writing processes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The reader's stance towards a text determines the type of instruction the reader engages in with texts.
“After all, the reader's stance towards a text determines the type of instruction the reader engages in with texts (Paulson and Armstrong 2009).”
From The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts (2025) · cites this paper as Paulson and Armstrong 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The pleasures of reading non‐fiction
Alexander, J., & Jarman, R. (2018) · Literacy · doi:10.1111/lit.12152 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts
Zhong, Y., Davies, M., & Wilson, A. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12816 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Paulson, E. J., & Armstrong, S. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- Northern Illinois University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Paulson, Eric J.
- Venue
- Literacy Research and Instruction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-12-15
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-97
- ISSN
- 0149-0117 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-8071
- 1938-8063
- OpenAlex
- W2104800648
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Literacy Research and Instruction (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Linguistics and Education Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
- Keywords
- writer stance, reading events, reading and writing relationship, reader response, writing instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review