Cited by 9Literacy and Educational PracticesLinguistics and Education ResearchLiteracy, Media, and Education

Situating Reader Stance Within and Beyond the Efferent–Aesthetic Continuum

Paulson, Eric J., Armstrong, Sonya L.·2009·Literacy Research and Instruction

Abstract

The purpose of this theoretical essay is to encourage critical reflection of the relationship of specific reading events to traditional conceptualizations of reader stance. While conventional models of reader stance are useful for considering many aspects of reading, there are reading events that engender stances that appear to lie outside of the parameters of these traditional conceptualizations. In this article, we identify one such reading event, termed reading-for-the-writer, and analyze the specific point it occupies on an efferent-aesthetic continuum, a continuum that we view as more three-dimensional than linear and that includes both reader stances and writer stances. Through such analyses of specific stances, we conclude with pedagogical implications and research directions that move toward continued discussion of the interconnectedness of reading and writing processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19388070902736821

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paulson, E. J., & Armstrong, S. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Northern Illinois University (US)
Corresponding author
Paulson, Eric J.
Venue
Literacy Research and Instruction
Published
2009-12-15
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
86-97
ISSN
  • 0149-0117 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-8071
  • 1938-8063
OpenAlex
W2104800648
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Literacy Research and Instruction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Linguistics and Education Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
Keywords
writer stance, reading events, reading and writing relationship, reader response, writing instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review