Cited by 32Berberine and alkaloids researchPharmaceutical Quality and CounterfeitingComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

Variability in Potency Among Commercial Preparations of Berberine

Open access
Funk, Ryan S., Singh, Rakesh K., Winefield, Robert D., Kandel, Sylvie E., Ruisinger, Janelle F., Moriarty, Patrick M., Backes, James M.·2018·Journal of Dietary Supplements

Abstract

Berberine is an isoquinoline alkaloid plant extract that is widely available as a dietary supplement in the United States and has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia. Because of its increased use and purported pharmacological properties, potential variations in product quality could pose a barrier to berberine's safety and effectiveness in clinical practice. Thus, this study evaluated the potency of dietary supplements containing berberine available in the U.S. commercial market. Fifteen unique dietary supplements containing berberine were purchased through U.S. dietary supplement vendors. For each product, berberine was extracted from 3 unique capsules and analyzed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Percentage content based on the product label claim was determined for each product. The average berberine content across the products was found to be 75% ± 25% of the product label claim, with product potency ranging from 33% to 100%. Nine of the 15 tested products (60%) failed to meet the potency standards of 90% to 110% of labeled content claim, as commonly required of pharmaceutical preparations by the U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. Evaluation of the relationship between product cost and the measured potency failed to demonstrate an association between quality and cost. Variability in product quality may significantly contribute to inconsistencies in the safety and effectiveness of berberine. In addition, the quality of the berberine product cannot be inferred from its cost.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19390211.2017.1347227

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Botanical identity and actual alkaloid content of berberine products vary considerably, and contamination and substitution are documented in botanical products.

    “The first is product quality: botanical identity and actual alkaloid content vary considerably, and contamination and substitution are documented in botanical products [32,34].”

    From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Results (page not available in our copy) show considerable variation in actual berberine content across 15 products. The paper does not establish variation in botanical identity or document contamination or substitution; it measured berberine content, not those other aspects of product quality. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Neither direction of product non-conformity can be read off the label, so the defensible position is that the perpetrator dose is unknown.

    “Neither direction can be read off the label, so the defensible position is that the perpetrator dose is unknown [2,32,34].”

    From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Results report that tested berberine products contained 33%–100% of their labeled dose, supporting the point that a label may not reveal the actual dose. They do not document products exceeding the labeled amount, so this source does not support the claim about both directions of non-conformity. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Non-conformity of a significant proportion of marketed berberine products means that the magnitude of any interaction is intrinsically unpredictable without standardization.

    “Non-conformity of a significant proportion of marketed products means that the magnitude of any interaction is intrinsically unpredictable without standardization [32,34].”

    From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Abstract reports that 9 of 15 tested berberine products failed the stated potency standard, and the Discussion says potency variation may make clinical responses less predictable. The paper does not establish that the magnitude of drug interactions is intrinsically unpredictable without standardization; its Introduction notes only that berberine has the potential for clinically relevant interactions. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Formulations designed to raise absorption, whether TPGS-based, dihydroberberine or other enhanced-bioavailability preparations, change systemic exposure deliberately, so an effect size measured with one product cannot be carried over to another even when the labeled dose matches.

    “Formulations designed to raise absorption, whether TPGS-based, dihydroberberine or other enhanced-bioavailability preparations, change systemic exposure deliberately, so an effect size measured with one product cannot be carried over to another even when the labeled dose matches.”

    From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [32]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The heterogeneity of commercial products limits the generalizability of any effect-size estimate.

    “Finally, the heterogeneity of commercial products limits the generalizability of any effect-size estimate [32,33].”

    From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports marked variation in berberine content among commercial products and says product-quality differences can produce inconsistent clinical responses. This supports concern about applying findings across products, but the paper does not assess the generalizability of effect-size estimates or establish that any such estimate is limited. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Haji A, Iranian J Chem Chem Eng., 29, 55
  2. Pang B, Int J Endocrinol., 905749
  3. Sha W, Int J Integr Med., 1, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Funk, R. S., Singh, R. K., Winefield, R. D., Kandel, S. E., Ruisinger, J. F., Moriarty, P. M., & Backes, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Funk, Ryan S.
Venue
Journal of Dietary Supplements
Published
2017-08-09
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
343-351
ISSN
  • 1939-0211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-022X
OpenAlex
W2744322969
Cited by
29
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dietary Supplements (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM103549, P30GM118247)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Berberine and alkaloids research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
berberine, dietary supplements, isoquinoline alkaloids, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia
MeSH terms
Hypolipidemic Agents, Berberine, Capsules, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Costs and Cost Analysis, Food Inspection, Food Labeling, Hypoglycemic Agents, Pharmacopoeias as Topic, Plant Extracts, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Molecular Structure, Dietary Supplements, Internet, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Berberis, Hydrastis, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Food Quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review