Image positioning and identification method and system for coal and gangue sorting robot
Abstract
Accurately positioning and identifying coal and gangue under the heterogeneous and complex scenarios of coal production is a key and difficult problem for coal and gangue sorting robot. This paper proposes an image processing based method for the problem and further develops a positioning and identification system. The coal and gangue samples are selected from Hancheng Coal Mine, China’s Shaanxi province. Three automatic image threshold segmentation methods are used for image binarization and the comparative analysis shows that the clustering method outperforms the others. Particle analysis of coal and gangue samples is carried out by using the morphological corrosion and expansion methods and a complete, clean target sample is obtained; the center of mass is extracted by using the center of mass method. The features of the grayscale and texture of the samples are analyzed under the light of 300lux. It is found that coal and gangue have higher discrimination degrees in gray variance, skewness, texture contrast and entropy than other parameters. LS-SVM (Least squares support vector machines) is applied as the image classifier. Three classifiers are trained by using the feature of grayscale, texture, and the joint feature combining skewness with contrast respectively. The experimental results show that the classifier using the joint feature outperforms the others. Furthermore, we develop a positioning and identification system and further evaluate the system by using the images…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An image processing-based coal and gangue sorting method achieved identification accuracy of 88.3% and 90.0%, and average object mass centre coordinate errors in x and y directions of 2.73% and 2.72%.
“The presented method achieved identification accuracy of coal and gangue samples of 88.3% and 90.0%, and the average object mass centre coordinate errors in the x and y directions were 2.73% and 2.72%, respectively [42].”
From Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities (2021) · cites this paper as [42]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities
Dzedzickis, A., Subačiūtė-Žemaitienė, J., Šutinys, E., Samukaitė-Bubnienė, U., & Bučinskas, V. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12010135 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
- Authors
- Li, M., Duan, Y., He, X., & Yang, M.
- Affiliations
- Xi'an University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Duan, Yong
- Venue
- International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-05-13
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1759-1777
- ISSN
- 1939-2699 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2702
- OpenAlex
- W3024003582
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 9
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- The education department of Shaanxi province (18JC022)
- Shaanxi Provincial Science and Technology Department (2018GY-039)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Mineral Processing and Grinding
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- image segmentation, erosion and dilation, texture features, gray-level features, least squares support vector machine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review