Cited by 73Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionMineral Processing and GrindingAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Image positioning and identification method and system for coal and gangue sorting robot

Li, Man, Duan, Yong, He, Xianli, Yang, Maolin·2022·International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization

Abstract

Accurately positioning and identifying coal and gangue under the heterogeneous and complex scenarios of coal production is a key and difficult problem for coal and gangue sorting robot. This paper proposes an image processing based method for the problem and further develops a positioning and identification system. The coal and gangue samples are selected from Hancheng Coal Mine, China’s Shaanxi province. Three automatic image threshold segmentation methods are used for image binarization and the comparative analysis shows that the clustering method outperforms the others. Particle analysis of coal and gangue samples is carried out by using the morphological corrosion and expansion methods and a complete, clean target sample is obtained; the center of mass is extracted by using the center of mass method. The features of the grayscale and texture of the samples are analyzed under the light of 300lux. It is found that coal and gangue have higher discrimination degrees in gray variance, skewness, texture contrast and entropy than other parameters. LS-SVM (Least squares support vector machines) is applied as the image classifier. Three classifiers are trained by using the feature of grayscale, texture, and the joint feature combining skewness with contrast respectively. The experimental results show that the classifier using the joint feature outperforms the others. Furthermore, we develop a positioning and identification system and further evaluate the system by using the images…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19392699.2020.1760855

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An image processing-based coal and gangue sorting method achieved identification accuracy of 88.3% and 90.0%, and average object mass centre coordinate errors in x and y directions of 2.73% and 2.72%.

    “The presented method achieved identification accuracy of coal and gangue samples of 88.3% and 90.0%, and the average object mass centre coordinate errors in the x and y directions were 2.73% and 2.72%, respectively [42].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, M., Duan, Y., He, X., & Yang, M.
Affiliations
Xi'an University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Duan, Yong
Venue
International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization
Published
2020-05-13
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
1759-1777
ISSN
  • 1939-2699 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2702
OpenAlex
W3024003582
Cited by
73
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 9
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • The education department of Shaanxi province (18JC022)
  • Shaanxi Provincial Science and Technology Department (2018GY-039)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Mineral Processing and Grinding
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
image segmentation, erosion and dilation, texture features, gray-level features, least squares support vector machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review