Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 73Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesOnline and Blended LearningReflective Practices in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reframing pedagogy while teaching about teaching online: a collaborative self-study

Fletcher, Tim, Bullock, Shawn M.·2015·Professional Development in Education

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to use collaborative self-study to analyze and describe our experiences of teaching about teaching in a digital, online environment. Data were gathered from reflective journal entries, emails and monthly Skype calls. Our findings indicate that the perceived disembodiment of teaching and learning online affected how we fostered relationships with students and responded to problems of practice. Further, we felt that a particular approach to teaching online risked teaching becoming reduced to providing feedback to students in the form of assessment, which had implications for our identities as teacher educators. By discussing our experiences of teaching online we began to develop a critical understanding of the challenges of teaching online, and questioned how our online practices shaped our developing pedagogies of teacher education.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19415257.2014.938357

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Arnold, P.J., 1988. Education, movement and the curriculum. Lewes: Falmer Press.
  2. 10.1080/19415250903454908 · DOI
  3. boyd, d., 2007. Why youth (heart) social networks: the role of networked publics in teenage social life. In: D. Bucking, ed. MacArthur foundation series on digital learning – youth, identity, and digital media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–26.
  4. boyd, d., 2014. It’s complicated: the social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  5. Brookfield, S.D., 1995. Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  6. 10.1007/978-1-4020-5281-1 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/17425964.2011.591173 · DOI
  8. 10.3102/0013189X030003013 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Charon, J.M., 2009. Symbolic interactionism: an introduction, an interpretation, an integration. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  10. 10.1080/1475939X.2012.731632 · DOI
  11. Craig, C.J., 2009. Trustworthiness in self-study research. In: C.A. Lassonde, S. Galman, and C. Kosnik, eds. Self-study methodologies for teacher educators. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 21–34. · DOI
  12. 10.1080/19415250903457158 · DOI
  13. Davis, B. and Sumara, D.J., 2006. Complexity and education: inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  14. 10.1080/08878730.2012.760023 · DOI
  15. 10.3102/0013189X032003026 · DOI
  16. Fernandez-Balboa, J.-M., 2003. Physical education in the digital (postmodern) era. In: A. Laker, ed. The future of physical education: building a new pedagogy. London: Routledge, 137–152.
  17. Fletcher, T., 2014. Self-study, principles of practice, and the development of a pedagogy of physical education teacher education. In: T. Fletcher, chair. Self-study and physical education: the nexus of scholarship and practice. Symposium at the International Association for Physical Education in Higher Education world congress, 10–13 February, Auckland, NZ.
  18. Fletcher, T. and Baker, K., in press. Prioritising classroom community and organisation in physical education teacher education. Teaching education.
  19. 10.1080/17425964.2012.657011 · DOI
  20. Goffman, E., 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Press Doubleday.
  21. Jenkins, R., 2008. Social identity. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
  22. Jonassen, D.H., 1996. Computers in the classroom: mindtools for critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  23. 10.1080/19415250903457224 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3 · DOI
  25. 10.2307/3105385 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.003 · DOI
  28. Loughran, J., 2006. Developing a pedagogy of teacher education. London: Routledge.
  29. Loughran, J., 2008. Toward a better understanding of teaching and learning about teaching. In: M. Cochran-Smith, et al., eds. Handbook of research on teacher education. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, 1177–1182.
  30. 10.1111/curi.2013.43.issue-1 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/02619760500478621 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/(ISSN)1536-0717 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/02607470600655243 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/15391523.2008.10782517 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Patton, M.Q., 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  36. Pinnegar, S. and Hamilton, M.L., 2009. Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research. Dordrecht: Springer.
  37. 10.1007/978-94-6209-240-2_12 · DOI
  38. 10.1163/9789087906900_002 · DOI
  39. Schön, D.A., 1983. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
  40. 10.1111/bjet.2011.42.issue-5 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Fletcher, T., & Bullock, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Brock University (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Fletcher, Tim
Venue
Professional Development in Education
Published
2014-08-19
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
690-706
ISSN
  • 1941-5257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-5265
OpenAlex
W2081858983
Cited by
73
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
13.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Professional Development in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
Keywords
online teacher training, collaborative self-study, teacher educators, online pedagogy, teacher-student relationship, teacher identity, digital learning environments, problems of practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.