‘I never feel alone in my classroom’: teacher professional growth within a blended community of practice
Abstract
Well-designed face-to-face and virtual communities of practice provide opportunities for teachers to learn, grow as professionals and make changes to their practice with the support of peers. However, as more K–12 teachers become Connected Educators and act as conduits between online spaces and communities in their schools, the boundaries between face-to-face and online communities of practice are blurred. While increasingly more teachers are engaging in blended learning opportunities, there is a dearth of research about how blended communities of practice shape K–12 teachers’ learning and professional growth. This manuscript reports the findings of a qualitative study that examined teachers’ experiences in a blended community of practice through in-depth interviews with 26 K–12 teachers. Data analysis suggests that multiple means of engagement, face-to-face learning activities and leadership roles are critical elements that shape participation and learning in a blended community of practice. Additionally, participation in a blended community of practice creates reciprocal growth opportunities, in which teachers can develop as professionals across multiple domains (e.g. individual, classroom, school, blended community of practice), while also shaping the growth of these domains. These findings have implications for shaping the future development and research of teacher learning in blended communities of practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The pilot findings on peer support correspond with literature conclusions about the importance of creating community support infrastructures to mitigate the isolation felt by many teachers in purely online courses.
“These findings correspond with the conclusions found in the literature about the importance to create community support infrastructures to mitigate the isolation felt by many teachers in purely online courses (Hoffmann-Dumienski, 2016;Hramiak, 2010;Trust & Horrocks, 2017).”
From Using personalized support & school-based study groups to increase teachers’ participation in MOOCs: Findings from two European pilot projects (2021) · cites this paper as Trust & Horrocks, 2017
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 33,219 · see citing works
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The process of learning in the DEN was situated, social and distributed (Brown et al. 1989, Hutchins 1995, Lave and Wenger 1991).”
BackgroundHow a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds
Hutchins, E. (1995) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1903_1 · Cited by 1,880 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The process of learning in the DEN was situated, social and distributed (Brown et al. 1989, Hutchins 1995, Lave and Wenger 1991).”
BackgroundReframing Professional Development Through Understanding Authentic Professional Learning
Webster-Wright, A. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308330970 · Cited by 1,174 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To keep up, teachers need learning opportunities that are fl exible, situated in their work contexts and ongoing (for example, Webster-Wright 2009, Trust et al. 2016).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Price, E., Lau, A. C., Goldberg, F., Turpen, C., Smith, P. S., Dancy, M., & Robinson, S. (2021) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00268-7 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Hertz, B., & Engelhardt, K. (2021) · IUL Research · doi:10.57568/iulres.v2i3.123 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Trust, T., & Horrocks, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Corresponding author
- Trust, Torrey
- ORCID
- Trust, Torrey
- Venue
- Professional Development in Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-09-26
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 645-665
- ISSN
- 1941-5257 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-5265
- OpenAlex
- W2524946388
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 22.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Professional Development in Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- teacher professional development, blended learning, communities of practice, K-12 teachers, teacher learning, online learning communities, face-to-face learning, teacher leadership, teacher participation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review