Cited by 82Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesInnovative Education and Learning PracticesOnline and Blended Learning

‘I never feel alone in my classroom’: teacher professional growth within a blended community of practice

Trust, Torrey, Horrocks, Brian·2017·Professional Development in Education

Abstract

Well-designed face-to-face and virtual communities of practice provide opportunities for teachers to learn, grow as professionals and make changes to their practice with the support of peers. However, as more K–12 teachers become Connected Educators and act as conduits between online spaces and communities in their schools, the boundaries between face-to-face and online communities of practice are blurred. While increasingly more teachers are engaging in blended learning opportunities, there is a dearth of research about how blended communities of practice shape K–12 teachers’ learning and professional growth. This manuscript reports the findings of a qualitative study that examined teachers’ experiences in a blended community of practice through in-depth interviews with 26 K–12 teachers. Data analysis suggests that multiple means of engagement, face-to-face learning activities and leadership roles are critical elements that shape participation and learning in a blended community of practice. Additionally, participation in a blended community of practice creates reciprocal growth opportunities, in which teachers can develop as professionals across multiple domains (e.g. individual, classroom, school, blended community of practice), while also shaping the growth of these domains. These findings have implications for shaping the future development and research of teacher learning in blended communities of practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19415257.2016.1233507

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pilot findings on peer support correspond with literature conclusions about the importance of creating community support infrastructures to mitigate the isolation felt by many teachers in purely online courses.

    “These findings correspond with the conclusions found in the literature about the importance to create community support infrastructures to mitigate the isolation felt by many teachers in purely online courses (Hoffmann-Dumienski, 2016;Hramiak, 2010;Trust & Horrocks, 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trust, T., & Horrocks, B.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
Trust, Torrey
Venue
Professional Development in Education
Published
2016-09-26
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
645-665
ISSN
  • 1941-5257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-5265
OpenAlex
W2524946388
Cited by
82
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
FWCI
22.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Professional Development in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
teacher professional development, blended learning, communities of practice, K-12 teachers, teacher learning, online learning communities, face-to-face learning, teacher leadership, teacher participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review