In vitro and in silico assessment of the developability of a designed monoclonal antibody library
Open accessAbstract
Despite major advances in antibody discovery technologies, the successful development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) into effective therapeutic and diagnostic agents can often be impeded by developability liabilities, such as poor expression, low solubility, high viscosity and aggregation. Therefore, strategies to predict at the early phases of antibody development the risk of late-stage failure of antibody candidates are highly valuable. In this work, we employ the in silico solubility predictor CamSol to design a library of 17 variants of a humanized mAb predicted to span a broad range of solubility values, and we examine their developability potential with a battery of commonly used in vitro and in silico assays. Our results demonstrate the ability of CamSol to rationally enhance mAb developability, and provide a quantitative comparison of in vitro developability measurements with each other and with more resource-intensive solubility measurements, as well as with in silico predictors that offer a potentially faster and cheaper alternative. We observed a strong correlation between predicted and experimentally determined solubility values, as well as with measurements obtained using a panel of in vitro developability assays that probe non-specific interactions. These results indicate that computational methods have the potential to reduce or eliminate the need of carrying out laborious in vitro quality controls for large numbers of lead candidates. Overall, our study provides support to the emerging view that the implementation of in silico tools in antibody discovery campaigns can ensure rapid and early selection of antibodies with optimal developability potential.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Good solubility is crucial to avoid aggregation that can potentially lead to loss of activity, degradation of antibodies or immunogenicity.
“Good solubility is crucial [202, 203] to avoid aggregation that can potentially lead to loss of activity, degradation of antibodies or immunogenicity, as discussed previously.”
From Computational approaches to therapeutic antibody design: established methods and emerging trends (2020) · cites this paper as [203]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 97
- Authors
- Wolf Pérez, A.-M., Sormanni, P., Andersen, J. S., Sakhnini, L. I., Rodriguez-Leon, I., Bjelke, J. R., Gajhede, A. J., De Maria, L., Otzen, D. E., Vendruscolo, M., & Lorenzen, N.
- Affiliations
- Large Protein Biophysics, Novo Nordisk A/S, Måløv, Denmark
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
- Modelling Department, Novo Nordisk A/S, Måløv, Denmark
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Vendruscolo, Michele
- ORCID
- Venue
- mAbs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-01-18
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 388-400
- ISSN
- 1942-0862 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-0870
- PMC
- PMC6380425
- OpenAlex
- W2905570097
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11
- FWCI
- 5.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- mAbs (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Apollo
- Funders
- Innovationsfonden
- Novo Nordisk
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Keywords
- humanized monoclonal antibody, antibody aggregation, antibody discovery
- MeSH terms
- Drug Development, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Computer Simulation, Humans, Solubility, Structure-Activity Relationship, Drug Discovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review