Computational approaches to therapeutic antibody design: established methods and emerging trends
Open accessAbstract
Antibodies are proteins that recognize the molecular surfaces of potentially noxious molecules to mount an adaptive immune response or, in the case of autoimmune diseases, molecules that are part of healthy cells and tissues. Due to their binding versatility, antibodies are currently the largest class of biotherapeutics, with five monoclonal antibodies ranked in the top 10 blockbuster drugs. Computational advances in protein modelling and design can have a tangible impact on antibody-based therapeutic development. Antibody-specific computational protocols currently benefit from an increasing volume of data provided by next generation sequencing and application to related drug modalities based on traditional antibodies, such as nanobodies. Here we present a structured overview of available databases, methods and emerging trends in computational antibody analysis and contextualize them towards the engineering of candidate antibody therapeutics.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review surveys databases, computational methods, and emerging trends for therapeutic antibody design, covering numbering, structural modelling, interface prediction, docking, design, immunogenicity, and developability. It argues computational tools can guide but not replace experimental antibody discovery, with NGS data and nanobody-specific benchmarking as key emerging areas.
Key findings
- Antibodies are the largest class of biotherapeutics, with five monoclonal antibodies ranked in the top 10 blockbuster drugs: adalimumab and infliximab (anti-TNFα), rituximab (anti-CD20), bevacizumab (anti-VEGF), and trastuzumab (anti-HER2/neu).
- Established computational methods include homology modelling, protein–protein docking, and interface prediction; in the Antibody Modelling Assessment II, overall FV modelling accuracy averaged 1.1 Å RMSD, while CDRH3 was modelled to >5 Å RMSD in some targets.
- Antibody-specific databases and data resources are expanding: SAbDab identified about 3500 of approximately 150,000 PDB structures as containing at least one antibody or nanobody chain, and Ab-Bind holds data on 1101 mutations across 32 antibody complexes.
- Nanobodies are an emerging therapeutic format, with caplacizumab approved in 2018; their CDRH3 loops are on average three to four residues longer than antibody counterparts, and nanobody paratopes contain on average nearly three additional residues, making direct transfer of antibody computational tools uncertain.
Methods
- Design: narrative review providing a structured overview of available databases, algorithms, and resources for computational antibody analysis and design.
- Data or sample: no primary experimental sample; the paper synthesizes published antibody databases, computational tools, and literature on therapeutic antibody development, including NGS, structural, and experimental data resources.
- Main analysis: qualitative synthesis and contextualization of methods toward engineering candidate antibody therapeutics, including tables of databases and computational tools.
Limitations
- The paper states that computational methods are unlikely to replace the entire discovery process, that docking methods still cannot rival X-ray crystallography-derived structures, that existing epitope prediction systems still do not provide reliable predictions, and that the connection between computational immune epitope predictions and anti-drug antibodies remains largely untested.
- The paper states that it is not clear whether current antibody modelling, docking, and related methods are directly transferable to nanobodies, and that systematic benchmarking is needed.
- Evident from the text: this is a narrative review without a systematic search strategy, quantitative synthesis, or new experimental data.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 177 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
AntibodyInterfacePrediction and AG-Fast-Parapred were not compared against one another.
“To the best of our knowledge AntibodyInterfacePrediction and AG-Fast-Parapred are currently the best performing paratope prediction methods as compared to previously available methods; however, they were not compared against one another.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Computational approaches hold promise in advancing the field by providing faster results than arduous experimental approaches that are the current standard in antibody discovery.
“Computational approaches hold promise in advancing the field by providing faster results than arduous experimental approaches that are the current standard in antibody discovery [5].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Krawczyk, 2017, Computational tools for aiding rational antibody design, Methods Mol Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The increasing number of structural, sequence and experimental data on antibodies being deposited in the public domain provides the necessary foundation for improving data-driven methods.
“The increasing number of structural [16], sequence [17] and experimental data [18–21] on antibodies being deposited in the public domain provides the necessary foundation for improving such data-driven methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 6 sources checked- cites [16] Dunbar, 2013, SAbDab: the structural antibody database, Nucleic Acids Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Kovaltsuk, 2018, Observed antibody space: a resource for data mining next-generation sequencing of antibody repertoires, J Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Vita, 2010, The immune epitope database 2.0, Nucleic Acids Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Sirin, 2016, AB-Bind: antibody binding mutational database for computational affinity predictions, Protein Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Koenig, 2017, Mutational landscape of antibody variable domains reveals a switch modulating the interdomain conformational dynamics and antigen binding, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Jain, 2017, Biophysical properties of the clinical-stage antibody landscape, Proc Natl Acad Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
CDRH3 is very important for antigen recognition.
“CDRH3 possesses the highest sequence and structural diversity of the six CDRs [33] and is very important for antigen recognition [34, 35].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [34] Tsuchiya, 2016, The diversity of H3 loops determines the antigen-binding tendencies of antibody CDR loops, Protein Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Xu, 2000, Diversity in the CDR3 region of V H is sufficient for most antibody specificities, Immunity source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
There are pharmaceutically focused computational approaches that aid in assessing the immunogenicity and biophysical properties of antibodies.
“There are also pharmaceutically focused computational approaches that aid in assessing the immunogenicity [14] and biophysical properties [15] of antibodies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
- Premisenone given
Despite being half the size of a standard antibody variable domain, nanobodies retain similar binding affinity and specificity as standard mAbs.
“Despite being half the size of a standard antibody variable domain (Figure 1D), nanobodies retain similar binding affinity and specificity as standard mAbs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Discerning the biases of antibody repertoires can provide insights into the natural diversity of the immune system.
“Discerning the biases of antibody repertoires can provide insights into the natural diversity of the immune system [25].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Brown, 2019, Augmenting adaptive immunity: progress and challenges in the quantitative engineering and analysis of adaptive immune receptor repertoires source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Standard mAb therapeutics have limited tissue penetration as a result of their large molecular weight (~150 kDa).
“Standard mAb therapeutics have limited tissue penetration as a result of their large molecular weight (~150 kDa).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Established structural bioinformatics methods such as homology modelling, protein-protein docking or protein interface prediction are already used for rational antibody design.
“Established structural bioinformatics methods such as homology modelling [6, 7], protein–protein docking [8, 9] or protein interface prediction [10] are already used for rational antibody design [11–13].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [11] Liu, 2017, Computational design of an epitope-specific Keap1 binding antibody using hotspot residues grafting and CDR loop swapping, Sci Rep source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Baran, 2017, Principles for computational design of binding antibodies, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [13] Raybould, 2019, Five computational developability guidelines for therapeutic antibody profiling, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Due to their central role in antigen recognition and binding, CDR loops undergo the most extensive engineering during development of monoclonal antibody therapeutics.
“Due to their central role in antigen recognition and binding, CDR loops undergo the most extensive engineering during development of monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics [36, 37].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [36] Knappik, 2000, Fully synthetic human combinatorial antibody libraries (HuCAL) based on modular consensus frameworks and CDRs randomized with trinucleotides, J Mol Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [37] De Kruif, 1995, Selection and application of human single chain Fv antibody fragments from a semi-synthetic phage antibody display library with designed CDR3 regions, J Mol Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Single domain antibodies have attracted attention because of their smaller size and better biophysical properties with respect to antibodies (higher stability and lower suspected immunogenicity).
“Single domain antibodies have attracted attention because of their smaller size and better biophysical properties with respect to antibodies (higher stability and lower suspected immunogenicity) [27].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Bannas, 2017, Nanobodies and nanobody-based human heavy chain antibodies as antitumor therapeutics, Front Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Available antibody modelling tools vary radically in run-times, from around 60 s for AbodyBuilder to several hours for Rosetta-based frameworks.
“The tools vary radically in run-times, with tools such as AbodyBuilder capable of producing a model in around 60 s, to Rosetta-based frameworks that can take up to several hours.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Accurate structural information can be used during Lead Optimization to assess developability indicators such as hydrophobicity that rely on accurate models of the molecular surface of the paratope and epitope.
“Accurate structural information can be used during the Lead Optimization stage to assess various developability indicators, such as hydrophobicity [13] that rely on accurate models of the molecular surface of the paratope and epitope.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Raybould, 2019, Five computational developability guidelines for therapeutic antibody profiling, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The high degree of antibody sequence and structure conservation in the framework region and the five canonical loops leads to an overall high accuracy of antibody homology modelling.
“The high degree of antibody sequence and structure conservation in the framework region and the five canonical loops leads to an overall high accuracy of antibody homology modelling [7].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Almagro, 2014, Second antibody modeling assessment (AMA-II), Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Framework residues can bury a substantial amount of surface area upon antigen-antibody complex formation.
“Analyses of high resolution crystal structures of antigen-antibody complexes show that the framework residues can bury a substantial amount of surface area upon complex formation [159, 160].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [159] Kunik, 2012, Structural consensus among antibodies defines the antigen binding site, PLoS Comput Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [160] Wang, 2010, Potential aggregation-prone regions in complementarity-determining regions of antibodies and their contribution towards antigen recognition: a computational analysis, Pharm Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Computational antibody models cannot rival the accuracy of experimentally derived structures.
“Such results cannot rival the accuracy of experimentally derived structures, but a model with 1.0 Å RMSD, especially across the CDR region, can be used as a rapid proxy to delineate structural features of the molecule.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Routine bioinformatics methods such as homology modelling and protein-protein docking can be harnessed to guide the engineering of therapeutic antibodies.
“Routine bioinformatics methods such as homology modelling and protein–protein docking can be harnessed to guide the engineering of therapeutic antibodies [5].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Krawczyk, 2017, Computational tools for aiding rational antibody design, Methods Mol Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Computational methods that predict antibody-antigen contact surfaces could be a rapid alternative during therapeutic discovery efforts.
“Thus, computational methods that predict antibody–antigen contact surfaces could be a rapid alternative during therapeutic discovery efforts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Experimentally determining the 3D structure of the antibody–antigen complex using X-ray crystallography is the gold standard for obtaining atomic-level epitope–paratope interaction information.
- Rests on an assumption: Experimental structural methods are very time and resource consuming and their success is not guaranteed.
- Premisecitation
Despite different run times, antibody modelling tools produce comparable results.
“Despite different run times, the tools produce comparable results as exemplified by the Antibody Modelling Assessment II [7], a benchmarking experiment in which blinded predictions using some of the aforementioned tools were conducted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Almagro, 2014, Second antibody modeling assessment (AMA-II), Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AMA II reported that the overall accuracy of modelling the entire antibody FV is 1.1 Å RMSD on average.
“AMA II reported that the overall accuracy of modelling the entire antibody FV is 1.1 Å Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) on average, with the most challenging region being the CDRH3, which is modelled to >5 Å RMSD in some targets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Almagro, 2014, Second antibody modeling assessment (AMA-II), Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Antibody-specific knowledge-based approaches are fast and accurate if a template is available.
“Antibody-specific knowledge-based approaches are fast and accurate if a template is available [103].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [103] Choi, 2010, FREAD revisited: accurate loop structure prediction using a database search algorithm, Proteins source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
An antibody-focused side-chain approach such as PEARS could yield better results than protein-generic approaches such as SCWRL.
“Here, protein-generic approaches such as SCWRL [100] can be employed although it has been demonstrated that an antibody-focused approach, such as PEARS, could yield better results [98].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [98] Leem, 2018, Antibody side chain conformations are position-dependent, Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
About half of the 40-50 residues in the CDRs are in direct contact with the antigen, forming the paratope.
“About half of the 40–50 residues in the CDRs are in direct contact with the antigen, forming the paratope [157–159].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [157] Stave, 2013, Antibody and antigen contact residues define epitope and paratope size and structure, J Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [158] Sela-Culang, 2013, The structural basis of antibody–antigen recognition, Front Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [159] Kunik, 2012, Structural consensus among antibodies defines the antigen binding site, PLoS Comput Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The increasing availability of antibody-specific sequence, structure and experimental data allows development of bioinformatics tools facilitating antibody engineering.
“The increasing availability of antibody-specific sequence, structure and experimental data allows development of bioinformatics tools facilitating antibody engineering (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Knowledge-based methods are currently capable of providing accurate predictions for the five canonical CDR loops.
“Knowledge-based methods are currently capable of providing accurate predictions for the five canonical loops, but CDRH3 remains a challenge [156].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [156] Marks, 2017, Antibody H3 structure prediction, Comput Struct Biotechnol J source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Accurate determination of the relative orientation of the VH and VL domains is crucial to determine the correct shape of the paratope.
“The second step involves accurate determination of the relative orientation of the VH and VL domains, which is crucial to determine the correct shape of the paratope [107, 109].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [107] Bujotzek, 2015, Prediction of VH-VL domain orientation for antibody variable domain modeling, Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [109] Dunbar, 2013, ABangle: characterising the VH-VL orientation in antibodies, Protein Eng Des Sel source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
A model with 1.0 Å RMSD, especially across the CDR region, can be used as a rapid proxy to delineate structural features of the molecule.
“Such results cannot rival the accuracy of experimentally derived structures, but a model with 1.0 Å RMSD, especially across the CDR region, can be used as a rapid proxy to delineate structural features of the molecule.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Hybrid methods such as Sphinx combine knowledge-based and ab initio approaches to provide better all-round predictions irrespective of the presence or absence of a priori structural information.
“Hybrid methods such as Sphinx [102] combine knowledge-based and ab initio approaches to provide better all-round predictions irrespective of the presence or absence of a priori structural information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [102] Marks, 2017, Sphinx: merging knowledge-based and ab initio approaches to improve protein loop prediction, Bioinformatics source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Computational methods, such as homology modelling, docking or interface prediction can be used during the Lead Identification and Optimization phases to generate 3D models of the antibodies and predict or identify the key residues involved in antigen binding.
“Computational methods, such as homology modelling, docking or interface prediction can be used during the Lead Identification and Optimization phases to generate 3D models of the antibodies and predict or identify the key residues involved in antigen binding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
CDRH3 remains a challenge for knowledge-based CDR loop modelling.
“Knowledge-based methods are currently capable of providing accurate predictions for the five canonical loops, but CDRH3 remains a challenge [156].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [156] Marks, 2017, Antibody H3 structure prediction, Comput Struct Biotechnol J source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The biggest challenge in ab initio modelling remains selection of the best loop models among those generated.
“The biggest challenge in such ab initio modelling remains selection of best loop models among those generated [102].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [102] Marks, 2017, Sphinx: merging knowledge-based and ab initio approaches to improve protein loop prediction, Bioinformatics source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Knowledge of the epitope can be used for rational design in targeting an immunogenic region for vaccine development.
“From a therapeutic perspective, knowledge of the epitope can be used for rational design in targeting an immunogenic region for vaccine development [162].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [162] Kazi, 2018, Current progress of immunoinformatics approach harnessed for cellular- and antibody-dependent vaccine design, Pathog Glob Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Accurate prediction of biomolecular complexes remains a real challenge with much room for improvement.
“Despite the availability of experimental data and their use to drive the docking and/or score the generated models, accurate prediction of biomolecular complexes remains a real challenge with much room for improvement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
The four methods facilitate the re-design of CDRs to improve antibody stability and affinity through a combination of conformational and free energy change optimization upon modification of specific residues.
“The four methods outlined above facilitate the re-design of CDRs to improve antibody stability and affinity through a combination of conformational and free energy change optimization upon modification of specific residues.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Most docking algorithms do not take into account conformational changes of the components, performing only rigid-body docking.
“Most docking algorithms do not take into account conformational changes of the components, performing only ‘rigid-body docking’.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Computational predictors of paratopes could have an impact in constraining and guiding mutational choices for rational affinity engineering of therapeutics during Lead Optimization.
“Computational predictors of paratopes address this problem (Table 2C) and they could have an impact in constraining and guiding mutational choices for rational affinity engineering of therapeutics during Lead Optimization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Four methods have been made available for computational antibody design: OptCDR, OptMAVEn, AbDesign and RosettaAntibodyDesign.
“Since then, four methods have been made available: OptCDR [139], OptMAVEn[140], AbDesign [143] and RosettaAntibodyDesign [142].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [139] Pantazes, 2010, OptCDR: a general computational method for the design of antibody complementarity determining regions for targeted epitope binding, Protein Eng Des Sel source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [140] Li, 2014, OptMAVEn—a new framework for the de novo design of antibody variable region models targeting specific antigen epitopes, PLoS One source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [143] Lapidoth, 2015, AbDesign: an algorithm for combinatorial backbone design guided by natural conformations and sequences, Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Paratope and epitope prediction methods do not provide information about the specific interactions involved in antibody-antigen binding.
“Paratope and epitope prediction can offer useful information on antibody–antigen recognition, which can be exploited for therapeutic design but these methods do not provide information about the specific interactions involved in antibody–antigen binding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Flexibility of the molecule is a crucial factor to be considered in most cases.
“Since in most cases flexibility of the molecule is a crucial factor to be considered [177], approaches that tackle this problem have been developed over the years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [177] Kotev, 2016, Challenges of docking in large, flexible and promiscuous binding sites, Bioorganic Med Chem source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Lippow and co-workers computationally improved the binding of an antibody against its target, starting from an existing structural complex.
“The seminal work on the subject was published by Lippow and co-workers, who computationally improved the binding of an antibody against its target, starting from an existing structural complex [181].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [181] Lippow, 2007, Computational design of antibody-affinity improvement beyond in vivo maturation, Nat Biotechnol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Antibody i-Patch assigns a score to each residue with respect to its propensity to be part of the paratope, with high-scoring residues offering potential candidates for mutagenesis.
“For instance, statistical approaches such as Antibody i-Patch [110] assign a score to each residue with respect to its propensity to be part of the paratope, with high-scoring residues offering potential candidates for mutagenesis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [110] Krawczyk, 2013, Antibody i-Patch prediction of the antibody binding site improves rigid local antibody–antigen docking, Protein Eng Des Sel source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Computational predictors of paratopes can provide valuable information to guide the modelling of antibody-antigen complexes during Lead Identification.
“They can also provide valuable information to guide the modelling of antibody–antigen complexes during Lead Identification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Liu and co-workers validated an approach in which binding site motifs from existing protein-protein complexes were transferred directly onto an antibody in a process termed 'hot-spot grafting'.
“In contrast, Liu and co-workers validated an approach in which binding site motifs from existing protein–protein complexes were transferred directly onto an antibody in a process termed ‘hot-spot grafting’ [11].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Liu, 2017, Computational design of an epitope-specific Keap1 binding antibody using hotspot residues grafting and CDR loop swapping, Sci Rep source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Antibody i-Patch and Paratome were outperformed by machine learning approaches such as proABC, AntibodyInterfacePrediction, Parapred and AG-Fast-Parapred.
“Recently, Antibody i-Patch and Paratome were outperformed by machine learning approaches such as the random forest-based proABC [112], support-vector machine-based AntibodyInterfacePrediction [114] and the deep learning-based, Parapred [113] and AG-Fast-Parapred [115].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [112] Olimpieri, 2013, Prediction of site-specific interactions in antibody–antigen complexes: the proABC method and server, Bioinformatics source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [114] Daberdaku, 2018, Antibody interface prediction with 3D Zernike descriptors and SVM, Bioinformatics source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [113] Liberis, 2018, Parapred: antibody paratope prediction using convolutional and recurrent neural networks, Bioinformatics source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Antibody-antigen docking addresses the lack of specific interaction information from paratope and epitope prediction.
“This issue is addressed by antibody–antigen docking, a specialized application of the broader field of molecular docking [170] (Figure 2B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [170] Pagadala, 2017, Software for molecular docking: a review, Biophys Rev source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Animal-derived antibodies undergo humanization to avoid immunological issues.
“To avoid such issues, animal-derived antibodies undergo a process called humanization [185, 186].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [185] Jones, 1986, Replacing the complementarity-determining regions in a human antibody with those from a mouse, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [186] Almagro, 2008, Humanization of antibodies, Front Biosci
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Current docking methods still cannot rival the reliability of X-ray crystallography-derived structures.
“Current docking methods still cannot rival the reliability of X-ray crystallography-derived structures and their performance is regularly assessed by the Critical Assessment of Predicted Interactions (CAPRI) [179].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [179] Lensink, 2017, Modeling protein–protein and protein–peptide complexes: CAPRI 6th edition, Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
HADDOCK is able to provide high quality models when only a loose definition of the epitope and the hypervariable loops of antibodies are used to drive the docking.
“In the case of antibodies, it has recently been demonstrated that HADDOCK is able to already provide high quality models when only a loose definition of the epitope and the hypervariable loops of antibodies are used to drive the docking [178].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [178] Ambrosetti, 2019, Information-driven modelling of antibody–antigen complexes, SSRN Electron J source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Accurate delineation of an epitope is an important step in characterizing the function of an antibody.
“Accurate delineation of an epitope is an important step in characterizing the function of an antibody [161] (Figure 2B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [161] Kringelum, 2012, Reliable B cell epitope predictions: impacts of method development and improved benchmarking, PLoS Comput Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Computational constructs can guide traditional discovery methods to accelerate the discovery of therapeutic lead candidates.
“This protocol is exemplary in showing how the computational constructs can guide the traditional discovery methods to accelerate the discovery of therapeutic lead candidates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Molecules raised in animals, such as mice, carry the risk of inducing an immunological response in humans in the form of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs).
“Molecules raised in animals, such as mice, carry the risk of inducing an immunological response in humans in the form of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The availability of an antigen structure opens up the possibility to develop a novel antibody binder computationally.
“The availability of an antigen structure opens up the possibility to develop a novel antibody binder computationally [180].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [180] Kuroda, 2018, Antibody affinity maturation by computational design, Methods Mol Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Tools such as Paratome can be used to identify positions in the framework region that might contribute to antigen recognition.
“Since not all paratope residues are constrained to the CDRs, tools such as Paratome [111, 159] can be used to identify positions in the framework region that might contribute to antigen recognition as well.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [111] Kunik, 2012, Paratome: an online tool for systematic identification of antigen-binding regions in antibodies based on sequence or structure, Nucleic Acids Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [159] Kunik, 2012, Structural consensus among antibodies defines the antigen binding site, PLoS Comput Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
To the best of the authors' knowledge, AntibodyInterfacePrediction and AG-Fast-Parapred are currently the best performing paratope prediction methods compared to previously available methods.
“To the best of our knowledge AntibodyInterfacePrediction and AG-Fast-Parapred are currently the best performing paratope prediction methods as compared to previously available methods; however, they were not compared against one another.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
CDR-located APRs also contribute significantly towards antigen binding.
“These CDR-located APRs also contribute significantly towards antigen binding [160], which help us rationalize how antibodies may lose potency upon aggregation and suggest potential strategies for selecting APRs for disruption without impacting biological activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [160] Wang, 2010, Potential aggregation-prone regions in complementarity-determining regions of antibodies and their contribution towards antigen recognition: a computational analysis, Pharm Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Clustering by V, J genes and CDRH3 sequence to identify large sequence-similar groups can identify antigen-specific cells after vaccinating humans with Hepatitis B.
“Clustering by V, J genes and CDRH3 sequence to identify large sequence-similar groups can identify antigen-specific cells after vaccinating humans with Hepatitis B [215].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [215] Galson, 2015, Analysis of B cell repertoire dynamics following hepatitis B vaccination in humans, and enrichment of vaccine-specific antibody sequences, EBioMedicine source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A similar approach based on identifying highly abundant sequences was used to select antigen-specific molecules in immunized mice.
“A similar approach based on identifying highly abundant sequences was used to select antigen-specific molecules in immunized mice [216].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [216] Reddy, 2010, Monoclonal antibodies isolated without screening by analyzing the variable-gene repertoire of plasma cells, Nat Biotechnol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
In silico predictions of potential MHC II binding T-cell immune epitopes in amino acid sequences can be used as part of immunogenicity risk assessment and mitigation during Lead Identification and Optimization stages.
“In silico predictions of potential MHC II binding T-cell immune epitopes in the amino acid sequences can be used as part of immunogenicity risk assessment and mitigation during the Lead Identification and Optimization stages along with other measures of humanness of the lead candidate sequences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Identification of antigen-specific antibodies after immunization can readily inform vaccine design since such antibodies can be used to confer passive immunity.
“Identification of antigen-specific antibodies after immunization can readily inform vaccine design since such antibodies can be used to confer passive immunity [218].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [218] Keller, 2000, Passive immunity in prevention and treatment of infectious diseases, Clin Microbiol Rev source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The DI combines computed hydrophobicity, SAP score and net charge into a statistical score indicating APRs.
“The DI combines the computed hydrophobicity, SAP score [211] and net charge of the molecule into a statistical score indicating APRs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [211] Chennamsetty, 2010, Prediction of aggregation prone regions of therapeutic proteins, J Phys Chem B source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The selection of false positives can be tackled by more complex statistical models.
“The selection of false positives can be tackled by more complex statistical models as highlighted by Fowler and co-workers [217].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [217] Fowler, 2018, Inferring B cell specificity for vaccines using a mixture model source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
A crucial first step towards ADA generation is the binding of short biotherapeutic-derived peptide fragments to MHC II molecules.
“A crucial first step towards ADA generation is the binding of short biotherapeutic-derived peptide fragments to major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II) molecules.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Sequencing a sample of the repertoire and identifying newly abundant sequence-similar BCRs is used as a simple bioinformatic method to identify new antibodies specific for the antigen of interest.
“Sequencing a sample of the repertoire and identifying newly abundant sequence-similar BCRs is being used as a simple bioinformatic method to identify new antibodies specific for the antigen of interest.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [215] Galson, 2015, Analysis of B cell repertoire dynamics following hepatitis B vaccination in humans, and enrichment of vaccine-specific antibody sequences, EBioMedicine source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [216] Reddy, 2010, Monoclonal antibodies isolated without screening by analyzing the variable-gene repertoire of plasma cells, Nat Biotechnol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Kumar and co-workers have observed an overlap between potential immune epitopes and aggregation prone regions (APRs) around the CDRs of therapeutic antibodies.
“Kumar and co-workers have observed an overlap between potential immune epitopes and aggregation prone regions (APRs) around the CDRs of therapeutic antibodies [195, 196].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [195] Kumar, 2011, Coupling of aggregation and immunogenicity in biotherapeutics: T- and B-cell immune epitopes may contain aggregation-prone regions, Pharm Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [196] Kumar, 2012, Relationship between potential aggregation-prone regions and HLA-DR-binding T-cell immune epitopes: implications for rational design of novel and follow-on therapeutic antibodies, J Pharm Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Good solubility is crucial to avoid aggregation that can potentially lead to loss of activity, degradation of antibodies or immunogenicity.
“Good solubility is crucial [202, 203] to avoid aggregation that can potentially lead to loss of activity, degradation of antibodies or immunogenicity, as discussed previously.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [202] Sormanni, 2015, The CamSol method of rational design of protein mutants with enhanced solubility, J Mol Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [203] Wolf Pérez, 2019, In vitro and in silico assessment of the developability of a designed monoclonal antibody library, MAbs source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Raybould et al.'s work demonstrates a new paradigm in employing naturally-sourced NGS data to guide therapeutic antibody development.
“This work demonstrates a new paradigm in employing the vast amount of naturally-sourced NGS data to guide therapeutic antibody development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Raybould, 2019, Five computational developability guidelines for therapeutic antibody profiling, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Jain and colleagues developed a surface accessible area predictor that can be applied to an antibody sequence to create a propensity score that could be correlated with aggregation risk.
“This was addressed by Jain and colleagues who developed a surface accessible area predictor that can be applied to an antibody sequence to further create a propensity score that could be correlated with aggregation risk [149].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [149] Jain, 2017, Prediction of delayed retention of antibodies in hydrophobic interaction chromatography from sequence using machine learning, Bioinformatics source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Wang and co-workers examined molecular sequences of commercially available mAb drug products and showed that they contain multiple well defined aggregation prone motifs often located in their CDRs.
“Wang and co-workers have examined molecular sequences of commercially available mAb drug products and shown that they contain multiple well defined aggregation prone motifs often located in their CDRs [206].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [206] Wang, 2009, Potential aggregation prone regions in biotherapeutics: a survey of commercial monoclonal antibodies, MAbs source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Obrezanova and colleagues used an extended set of physico-chemical parameters to create an Adaptive Boosting model for aggregation prediction.
“An extended set of physico-chemical parameters was used by Obrezanova and colleagues [15] to create an Adaptive Boosting model for aggregation prediction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Obrezanova, 2015, Aggregation risk prediction for antibodies and its application to biotherapeutic development, MAbs source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Statistical classifiers can identify immune profiles of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, multiple sclerosis or influenza from NGS data alone.
“It was demonstrated that statistical classifiers can identify immune profiles of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia [220], multiple sclerosis [221] or influenza [222] from NGS data alone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [220] Greiff, 2015, A bioinformatic framework for immune repertoire diversity profiling enables detection of immunological status, Genome Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [221] Ostmeyer, 2017, Statistical classifiers for diagnosing disease from immune repertoires: a case study using multiple sclerosis, BMC Bioinformatics source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [222] Arora, 2019, Repertoire-based diagnostics using statistical biophysics source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
More sophisticated methods that take positional correlations between residues into account could be superior to Humanness score and HSC.
“Humanness score and HSC are primarily sequence distance-based approaches and it has been demonstrated that more sophisticated methods that take the positional correlations between residues into account could be superior [187, 188].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Humanization is a complex process where simple pairwise homology and alignments might be insufficient.
“Although this takes into account antibody sequence diversity, humanization is a complex process where simple pairwise homology and alignments might be insufficient.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Given that the VL domain is much less structurally variable, the application of computational structural modelling tools to nanobody-antigen interactions will require innovation.
“Given that the VL domain is much less structurally variable, this suggests that the application of computational structural modelling tools to nanobody–antigen interactions will require innovation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The VL domain is much less structurally variable.
- Premisecitation
Human antibody repertoires appear to be constrained structurally, including regions of the antibody that display great variability such as the CDRH3 loop.
“Human antibody repertoires also appear to be constrained structurally, and this includes regions of the antibody that display great variability such as the CDRH3 loop [224].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [224] Krawczyk, 2018, Structurally mapping antibody repertoires, Front Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Analysis of large sets of nanobody-antigen co-crystal structures reveals that nanobody paratopes are made up of a much greater diversity of structural subunits, further increasing the modelling challenge.
“In addition, analysis of large sets of nanobody–antigen co-crystal structures reveals that nanobody paratopes are made up of a much greater diversity of structural subunits, further increasing the modelling challenge [231].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [231] Mitchell, 2018, Analysis of nanobody paratopes reveals greater diversity than classical antibodies, Protein Eng Des Sel source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Despite vast numbers of diverse sequences in a typical human antibody repertoire, a non-trivial amount of these is shared between individuals.
“From a sequence perspective, it was demonstrated recently that despite the vast numbers of diverse sequences in a typical human antibody repertoire, a non-trivial amount of these is shared between individuals [23, 223].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Nanobodies translate the same level of sequence variation into increased structural diversity across the CDRH1 and CDRH2 loops, which are not classifiable by established canonical rules, presenting additional challenges to computational structural modelling tools compared to classical antibodies.
“However, nanobodies translate this same level of sequence variation into increased structural diversity across the CDRH1 and CDRH2 loops, which are not classifiable by established canonical rules, presenting additional challenges to computational structural modelling tools compared to classical antibodies [232, 235].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [232] Mitchell, 2018, Comparative analysis of nanobody sequence and structure data, Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [235] Sircar, 2011, Analysis and modeling of the variable region of camelid single-domain antibodies, J Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Recent computational analyses of large sets of antibody and nanobody sequences and structures demonstrate that non-trivial systematic differences between these molecules exist.
“Recent computational analyses of large sets of antibody and nanobody sequences and structures demonstrate that non-trivial systematic differences between these molecules exist [231, 232].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [231] Mitchell, 2018, Analysis of nanobody paratopes reveals greater diversity than classical antibodies, Protein Eng Des Sel source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [232] Mitchell, 2018, Comparative analysis of nanobody sequence and structure data, Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Because of such differences it is not clear whether the current methods for antibody modelling, docking etc. are directly transferable to nanobodies.
“Because of such differences it is not clear whether the current methods for antibody modelling, docking etc. are directly transferable to nanobodies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Human antibody repertoires can maintain their fundamental sequence diversity despite the removal of as many as 50-90% of sequences.
“Human antibody repertoires can maintain their fundamental sequence diversity despite the removal of as many as 50–90% of sequences [214].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [214] Miho, 2019, Large-scale network analysis reveals the sequence space architecture of antibody repertoires, Nat Commun source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Many therapeutic CDRH3 loops can be found in naturally sourced NGS datasets, indicating a certain degree of convergence between antibodies raised experimentally and naturally occurring ones.
“Furthermore, many therapeutic CDRH3 loops can be found in naturally sourced NGS datasets, indicating a certain degree of convergence between antibodies raised experimentally and naturally occurring ones [225].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [225] Krawczyk, 2019, Looking for therapeutic antibodies in next generation sequencing repositories source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The AIRR community aims to standardize the increasing amount of antibody NGS depositions and their metadata.
“Such efforts are exemplified by AIRR community, which aims to standardize the increasing amount of antibody NGS depositions and their metadata [213], and from a broader perspective by the adoption of scientific data management principles such as FAIR [238].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [213] Rubelt, 2017, Adaptive Immune Receptor Repertoire Community recommendations for sharing immune-repertoire sequencing data, Nat Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [238] Wilkinson, 2016, The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship, Sci Data source
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 62
- May combine two claims. 35
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningComputational advances in protein modelling and design can have a tangible impact on antibody-based therapeutic development.
“Computational advances in protein modelling and design can have a tangible impact on antibody-based therapeutic development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAntibodies are currently the largest class of biotherapeutics.
“Due to their binding versatility, antibodies are currently the largest class of biotherapeutics, with five monoclonal antibodies ranked in the top 10 blockbuster drugs.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“Because of such favorable binding properties, antibodies have been harnessed for therapeutic purposes and are currently the largest class of biotherapeutics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Kaplon, 2018, Antibodies to watch in, MAbs
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFive of the current top-selling blockbusters are monoclonal antibodies: adalimumab, infliximab, rituximab, bevacizumab and trastuzumab.
“Five of the current top-selling blockbusters are monoclonal antibodies: adalimumab and infliximab (anti-TNFα), rituximab (anti-CD20), bevacizumab (anti-VEGF), trastuzumab (anti-HER2/neu) and their market presence is still expanding [4].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Kaplon, 2018, Antibodies to watch in, MAbs
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEach of the estimated 5 × 109 B-cells in an organism produces a distinct B-cell receptor or antibody through somatic recombination of variable, diversity, joining and constant gene segments.
“Each of the estimated 5 × 109 B-cells in an organism [23] produces a distinct B-cell receptor (membrane-bound) or antibody (in soluble form) through somatic recombination of variable (V), diversity (D), joining (J) and constant (C) gene segments [28, 29].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [23] Briney, 2019, Commonality despite exceptional diversity in the baseline human antibody repertoire, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [28] Tonegawa, 1983, Somatic generation of antibody diversity, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Hesslein, 2001, Factors and forces controlling V(D) J recombination, Adv Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationResources exist that curate the therapeutic antibody information, such as TABS and SAbDab-Therapeutic-Antibodies.
“Resources exist that curate the therapeutic antibody information, such as TABS (https://tabs.craic.com/) and SAbDab-Therapeutic-Antibodies [13].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Raybould, 2019, Five computational developability guidelines for therapeutic antibody profiling, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTools such as DIGIT and Abysis source their data from the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI); their sequence volumes are of the order of 105 and contain multiple artificially engineered sequences.
“Tools such as DIGIT and Abysis source their data from the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) [60] and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) [61]; their sequence volumes are of the order of 105 and contain multiple artificially engineered sequences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDespite the intrinsic sequence diversity in the CDRs, all hypervariable loops with the exception of CDRH3 adopt a constrained set of conformations termed canonical classes.
“Despite the intrinsic sequence diversity in the CDRs, all hypervariable loops with the exception of CDRH3 adopt a constrained set of conformations termed canonical classes [32].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Chothia, 1987, Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins, J Mol Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNatural preferences in antibody repertoires can be used as a reference to assess the biophysical properties of therapeutic antibodies or to develop naturally focused surface display libraries.
“Among others, such natural preferences can be used as a reference to assess the biophysical properties of therapeutic antibodies [13] or to develop naturally focused surface display libraries [26].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost repositories collect both antibody and nanobody data; however, there are also some databases specializing only in the latter, e.g. sdAb-DB.
“Most of these repositories collect both antibody and nanobody data; however, there are also some databases specializing only in the latter, e.g. sdAb-DB [58].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Wilton, 2018, sdAb-DB: the single domain antibody database, ACS Synth Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningAltogether, computational antibody analysis methods have matured enough to allow for wider applications in therapeutic development.
“Altogether, computational antibody analysis methods have matured enough to allow for wider applications in therapeutic development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCDRH3 possesses the highest sequence and structural diversity of the six CDRs.
“CDRH3 possesses the highest sequence and structural diversity of the six CDRs [33] and is very important for antigen recognition [34, 35].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Regep, 2017, The H3 loop of antibodies shows unique structural characteristics, Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese molecules are of increasing therapeutic interest with the first nanobody therapeutic (caplacizumab) approved in 2018.
“Therefore, these molecules are of increasing therapeutic interest with the first nanobody therapeutic (caplacizumab) approved in 2018 [42].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Duggan, 2018, Caplacizumab: first global approval, Drugs source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe leading database of germline antibody sequences is the International Immunogenetics Information System (IMGT) and it is widely used to derive gene assignments for recombined antibodies.
“The leading database of germline antibody sequences is the International Immunogenetics Information System (IMGT) [46] and it is widely used to derive gene assignments for recombined antibodies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Lefranc, 2015, IMGT R, the international ImMunoGeneTics information system R 25 years on, Nucleic Acids Res source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Protein Data Bank (PDB) is the main global repository of 3D structure information for proteins.
“The Protein Data Bank (PDB) is the main global repository of 3D structure information for proteins [65].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Berman, 2000, The protein data bank, Nucleic Acids Res source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationUpon antigen exposure, the antibody-producing B-cells undergo a natural process of affinity maturation, based on somatic hypermutation.
“Upon antigen exposure, the antibody-producing B-cells undergo a natural process of affinity maturation, based on somatic hypermutation [31].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Peters, 1996, Somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes is linked to transcription initiation, Immunity source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAccording to SAbDab, of the approximately 150,000 structures deposited in the PDB to date as many as 3500 are identified as containing at least one antibody (or nanobody) chain.
“According to SAbDab, of the approximately 150 000 structures deposited in the PDB to date as many as 3500 are identified as containing at least one antibody (or nanobody) chain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Dunbar, 2013, SAbDab: the structural antibody database, Nucleic Acids Res source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSAbDab specifically allows for a bulk download of its weekly updatable database, providing an up-to-date resource for applications such as antibody modelling or docking.
“SAbDab specifically allows for a bulk download of its weekly updatable database, providing an up-to-date resource for applications such as antibody modelling or docking.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Dunbar, 2013, SAbDab: the structural antibody database, Nucleic Acids Res source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDue to the high-throughput nature of NGS, sequence volumes are of the order of 108 and are associated with non-trivial error rates.
“Due to the high-throughput nature of NGS, sequence volumes are of the order of 108 and are associated with non-trivial error rates [62].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] Kovaltsuk, 2018, Filtering next-generation sequencing of the Ig gene repertoire data using antibody structural information, J Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe accumulated methodology of computational antibody protocols could potentially be applied to novel antibody formats with intrinsically better biophysical properties, such as nanobodies.
“The accumulated methodology of computational antibody protocols could potentially be applied to novel antibody formats with intrinsically better biophysical properties, such as nanobodies [27].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Bannas, 2017, Nanobodies and nanobody-based human heavy chain antibodies as antitumor therapeutics, Front Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCertain resources, such as Observed Antibody Space, address this by offering an annotation of the predicted sequence errors.
“Certain resources, such as Observed Antibody Space, address this by offering an annotation of the predicted sequence errors [62].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] Kovaltsuk, 2018, Filtering next-generation sequencing of the Ig gene repertoire data using antibody structural information, J Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe recent decade saw the advent of next generation sequencing (NGS) of B-cell receptor (antibody) repertoires.
“Specifically, the recent decade saw the advent of next generation sequencing (NGS) of B-cell receptor (antibody) repertoires [22].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Miho, 2018, Computational strategies for dissecting the high-dimensional complexity of adaptive immune repertoires, Front Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenComputational approaches to analyze and design antibodies rely on the availability of suitable datasets.
“Computational approaches to analyze and design antibodies rely on the availability of suitable datasets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNGS provides a snapshot of millions of antibody sequences sampled from the theoretically possible 1012-1015 antibody sequences in a human repertoire.
“NGS provides a snapshot of millions of antibody sequences sampled from the theoretically possible 1012–1015 antibody sequences in a human repertoire [23, 24].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [23] Briney, 2019, Commonality despite exceptional diversity in the baseline human antibody repertoire, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Glanville, 2009, Precise determination of the diversity of a combinatorial antibody library gives insight into the human immunoglobulin repertoire, Proc. Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn humans, the H and L chains can naturally assemble into five isotypes: IgG, IgD, IgE (all three monomers), IgA (dimer) and IgM (pentamer).
“In humans, the H and L chains can naturally assemble into five isotypes: IgG, IgD, IgE (all three monomers), IgA (dimer) and IgM (pentamer) [30].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Storb, 2016, Somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination, Encycl Immunobiol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTogether with the diversity introduced by V(D)J recombination, somatic hypermutation can produce an estimated 1012-1015 possible antibody sequences.
“Together with the diversity introduced by V(D) J recombination, somatic hypermutation can produce an estimated 1012–1015 possible antibody sequences [23, 24].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [23] Briney, 2019, Commonality despite exceptional diversity in the baseline human antibody repertoire, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Glanville, 2009, Precise determination of the diversity of a combinatorial antibody library gives insight into the human immunoglobulin repertoire, Proc. Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSabDab and Abysis allow retrieval of particular structures given a query antibody sequence (SAbDab) or by using more advanced features such as canonical classes of the CDRs (Abysis).
“SabDab and Abysis allow retrieval of particular structures given a query antibody sequence (SAbDab) or by using more advanced features such as canonical classes of the CDRs (Abysis).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSimilarities between antibody amino acid sequences further allow for the creation of a standardized reference framework, or numbering scheme, giving each variable region amino acid an identifier.
“Similarities between antibody amino acid sequences further allow for the creation of a standardized reference framework, or numbering scheme, giving each variable region amino acid an identifier [151].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [151] Dondelinger, 2018, Understanding the significance and implications of antibody numbering and antigen-binding surface/residue definition, Front Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBinding affinity data is contained in resources such as SAbDab and PDBBind.
“Such data is contained in resources such as SAbDab and PDBBind [54].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] Wang, 2005, The PDBbind database: methodologies and updates, J Med Chem source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKabat and IMGT definitions are based on sequence alignments identifying conserved positions in the variable region whereas Chothia takes into account the 3D structure of the CDR loops.
“Kabat and IMGT definitions are based on sequence alignments identifying conserved positions in the variable region [152, 153] whereas Chothia takes into account the 3D structure of the CDR loops.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [152] Wu, 1970, An analysis of the sequences of the variable regions of Bence Jones proteins and myeloma light chains and their implications for antibody complementarity, J Exp Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [153] Lefranc, 2011, IMGT unique numbering for the variable (V), constant (C), and groove (G) domains of IG, TR, MH, IgSF, and MhSF, Cold Spring Harb Protoc
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [32] Chothia, 1987, Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins, J Mol Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOther, more specialized, resources exist such as Ab-Bind, which hold data on 1101 mutations across 32 antibody complexes, and SKEMPI, which curates binding energy data for available structures but is not limited to antibody information only.
“Other, more specialized, resources exist such as Ab-Bind [19], which hold data on 1101 mutations across 32 antibody complexes, and SKEMPI [55], which curates binding energy data for available structures but is not limited to antibody information only.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [19] Sirin, 2016, AB-Bind: antibody binding mutational database for computational affinity predictions, Protein Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [55] Moal, 2012, SKEMPI: a structural kinetic and energetic database of mutant protein interactions and its use in empirical models, Bioinformatics source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenAntibody-based therapeutics are developed via well-established processes that can be broadly categorized into Lead Identification and Lead Optimization.
“Antibody-based therapeutics are developed via well-established processes that can be broadly categorized into Lead Identification and Lead Optimization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationData on epitopes targeted by antibodies can be readily downloaded from the IEDB that now links such information to epitope-specific antibody sequences.
“Data on epitopes targeted by antibodies can be readily downloaded from the IEDB that now links such information to epitope-specific antibody sequences [67].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [67] Mahajan, 2018, Epitope specific antibodies and T cell receptors in the immune epitope database, Front Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSince the seminal work to define a standard numbering scheme for antibodies was carried out by Kabat in 1970, the Chothia and IMGT schemes have been adopted as the main alternatives.
“Since the seminal work to define a standard numbering scheme for antibodies was carried out by Kabat in 1970 [152], the Chothia [32] and IMGT [153] schemes have been adopted as the main alternatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [152] Wu, 1970, An analysis of the sequences of the variable regions of Bence Jones proteins and myeloma light chains and their implications for antibody complementarity, J Exp Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [32] Chothia, 1987, Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins, J Mol Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [153] Lefranc, 2011, IMGT unique numbering for the variable (V), constant (C), and groove (G) domains of IG, TR, MH, IgSF, and MhSF, Cold Spring Harb Protoc
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenTo the best of our knowledge, there are three freely available software packages to perform numbering of antibodies, ANARCI, Abnum and AbRSA, to act as the first step in computational antibody analysis such as homology modelling.
“To the best of our knowledge, there are three freely available software packages to perform numbering of antibodies, ANARCI [83], Abnum [82] and AbRSA[81], to act as the first step in computational antibody analysis such as homology modelling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [83] Dunbar, 2015, ANARCI: Antigen receptor numbering and receptor classification, Bioinformatics source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [82] Abhinandan, 2008, Analysis and improvements to Kabat and structurally correct numbering of antibody variable domains, Mol Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [81] Li, 2019, AbRSA: a robust tool for antibody numbering, Protein Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCDRH3 is the most challenging region and is modelled to >5 Å RMSD in some targets.
“AMA II reported that the overall accuracy of modelling the entire antibody FV is 1.1 Å Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) on average, with the most challenging region being the CDRH3, which is modelled to >5 Å RMSD in some targets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Almagro, 2014, Second antibody modeling assessment (AMA-II), Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOther resources such as the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) link structural information to experimentally derived epitope data.
“Other resources such as the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) [18] link structural information to experimentally derived epitope data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Vita, 2010, The immune epitope database 2.0, Nucleic Acids Res source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationModelled antibody structures can be used at the Lead Identification stage to select surface exposed paratope residues for mutations or to characterize binding with respect to the cognate epitope.
“Modelled structures can be used at the Lead Identification stage to select surface exposed paratope residues for mutations [110] or to characterize the binding with respect to the cognate epitope [119].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [110] Krawczyk, 2013, Antibody i-Patch prediction of the antibody binding site improves rigid local antibody–antigen docking, Protein Eng Des Sel source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [119] Krawczyk, 2014, Improving B-cell epitope prediction and its application to global antibody–antigen docking, Bioinformatics source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenDuring Lead Identification and Optimization, molecules are assessed for unfavorable characteristics such as immunogenicity or poor biophysical properties.
“During Lead Identification and Optimization, molecules are assessed for unfavorable characteristics such as immunogenicity or poor biophysical properties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationArbitrary molecular surfaces appear to be indistinguishable from epitope regions, suggesting that predictions should be performed with reference to a particular antibody.
“However, arbitrary molecular surfaces appear to be indistinguishable from epitope regions [167–169] suggesting that predictions should be performed with reference to a particular antibody [116, 118–120].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 7 sources checked- cites [167] Kunik, 2013, The indistinguishability of epitopes from protein surface is explained by the distinct binding preferences of each of the six antigen-binding loops, Protein Eng Des Sel source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [168] Kringelum, 2013, Structural analysis of B-cell epitopes in antibody: protein complexes, Mol Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [169] Greenbaum, 2007, Towards a consensus on datasets and evaluation metrics for developing B-cell epitope prediction tools, J Mol Recognit source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [116] Rapberger, 2007, Identification of discontinuous antigenic determinants on proteins based on shape complementarities, J Mol Recognit source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [118] Sela-Culang, 2014, Using a combined computational-experimental approach to predict antibody-specific B cell epitopes, Structure source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [119] Krawczyk, 2014, Improving B-cell epitope prediction and its application to global antibody–antigen docking, Bioinformatics source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [120] Jespersen, 2019, Antibody specific B-cell epitope predictions: leveraging information from antibody–antigen protein complexes, Front Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRe-epitoping, pioneered by Ofran and collaborators, tests existing antibodies for complementarity to a target epitope and uses the best candidates to computationally construct focused surface display libraries.
“A further approach to data mining existing structures to improve antibody affinity is ‘re-epitoping’, pioneered by Ofran and collaborators [184]. Here, existing antibodies are tested for complementarity to a target epitope and the best candidates are used to computationally construct focused surface display libraries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [184] Nimrod, 2018, Computational design of epitope-specific functional antibodies, Cell Rep
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenExisting epitope prediction systems still do not provide reliable predictions, limiting their applicability in molecular docking.
“The most challenging aspect is identification of the epitope since, despite the great efforts of the community in developing accurate epitope prediction methods, existing systems still do not provide reliable predictions, limiting their applicability in molecular docking.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe methods outlined offer the potential for discovering specific and selective binders computationally, reducing the experimental effort during the Lead Identification stage.
“The methods outlined above offer the potential for discovering specific and selective binders computationally, reducing the experimental effort during the Lead Identification stage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCharacterization of the antibody-antigen interaction is important when filing therapeutic antibody patents.
“From a legal perspective, characterization of the antibody–antigen interaction is of importance when filing therapeutic antibody patents [163].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [163] Deng, 2017, Enhancing antibody patent protection using epitope mapping information, MAbs source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationSelected molecules from Lippow and co-workers had better affinity for the target, demonstrating that in some scenarios computational approaches alone can be used for affinity maturation.
“Selected molecules had better affinity for the target, demonstrating that in some scenarios computational approaches alone can be used for affinity maturation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [181] Lippow, 2007, Computational design of antibody-affinity improvement beyond in vivo maturation, Nat Biotechnol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe majority of epitopes are conformational in nature, therefore predictors that use structural antigen information offer more accurate results than linear methods.
“The majority of epitopes are conformational in nature therefore predictors that use structural antigen information offer more accurate results than linear methods [165, 166].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [165] Haste Andersen, 2006, Prediction of residues in discontinuous B-cell epitopes using protein 3D structures, Protein Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [166] Gao, 2014, Computational prediction of B cell epitopes from antigen sequences, Methods Mol Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningTriangulation of results from paratope prediction, epitope prediction and antibody-antigen docking methods could provide a relatively fast and cost-effective route to obtaining reliable information on which to base rational antibody design decisions.
“Therefore, as methods for antibody–antigen interaction prediction improve, it is to be expected that triangulation of results from paratope prediction, epitope prediction and antibody–antigen docking methods could provide a relatively fast and cost-effective route to obtaining reliable information on which to base rational antibody design decisions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAb initio antibody design methods are still emerging and need to be validated across multiple projects in an industrial setting to assess their utility.
“Ab inito methods such as these are still emerging and although some of them demonstrated the validity of their constructs experimentally there exists for them to be validated across multiple projects in industrial setting to assess their utility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationRaybould et al. stipulate five computational guidelines to define favorable biophysical properties in antibody therapeutics.
“In this study Raybould et al. stipulate five computational guidelines to define favorable biophysical properties in antibody therapeutics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Raybould, 2019, Five computational developability guidelines for therapeutic antibody profiling, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIdentification of hydrophobic regions is an important step in aggregation prediction that ideally requires a crystal structure of the antibody or a reliable homology model.
“Identification of hydrophobic regions is an important step in aggregation prediction that ideally requires a crystal structure of the antibody or a reliable homology model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationScore values diverging significantly from the natural distribution are highlighted and associated sequences flagged for developability risk.
“Score values diverging significantly from the natural distribution are highlighted and the associated sequences flagged for developability risk.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Raybould, 2019, Five computational developability guidelines for therapeutic antibody profiling, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe field currently benefits from a steady stream of new data from NGS of B-cell Receptors and increasing resources for downloading such data.
“In this respect, the field currently benefits from a steady stream of new data from NGS of B-cell Receptors (BCRs, to be used as proxy for antibodies) [212, 213] and there is an increasing number of resources available for downloading such data [17], which are being used to analyze therapeutic antibodies [13].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [212] Georgiou, 2014, The promise and challenge of high-throughput sequencing of the antibody repertoire, Nat Biotechnol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [213] Rubelt, 2017, Adaptive Immune Receptor Repertoire Community recommendations for sharing immune-repertoire sequencing data, Nat Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Kovaltsuk, 2018, Observed antibody space: a resource for data mining next-generation sequencing of antibody repertoires, J Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [13] Raybould, 2019, Five computational developability guidelines for therapeutic antibody profiling, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Adaptive Boosting model for aggregation prediction was trained and validated on a dataset of 500 antibodies with calculated biophysical properties.
“The model was trained and validated on a dataset of 500 antibodies with calculated biophysical properties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Obrezanova, 2015, Aggregation risk prediction for antibodies and its application to biotherapeutic development, MAbs source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe connection between computational predictions of immune epitopes and ADAs generated against biotherapeutics remains largely untested.
“We must emphasize that connection between computational predictions of immune epitopes and ADAs generated against biotherapeutics remains largely untested.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSimple models based on abundance or sequence similarity can identify sequences that are not antigen-specific or miss less abundant antigen-specific sequences.
“Such simple models however can still identify sequences that are not antigen-specific or miss less abundant antigen-specific sequences [215].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [215] Galson, 2015, Analysis of B cell repertoire dynamics following hepatitis B vaccination in humans, and enrichment of vaccine-specific antibody sequences, EBioMedicine source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCurrent bioinformatic analyses of NGS repertoires focus on large-scale decoding of immune responses, with several potential applications for therapeutic design.
“Current bioinformatic analyses of NGS repertoires focus on large-scale decoding of the immune responses, with several potential applications for therapeutic design [22, 25, 214].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [22] Miho, 2018, Computational strategies for dissecting the high-dimensional complexity of adaptive immune repertoires, Front Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [25] Brown, 2019, Augmenting adaptive immunity: progress and challenges in the quantitative engineering and analysis of adaptive immune receptor repertoires source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [214] Miho, 2019, Large-scale network analysis reveals the sequence space architecture of antibody repertoires, Nat Commun source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningGermline sequences only offer a limited view of overall mutational antibody diversity, which can be addressed by computational humanization comparing the animal-derived therapeutic to the distribution of amino acids in human antibody sequences.
“Germline sequences however only offer a limited view of overall mutational antibody diversity, which can be addressed by computational humanization, comparing the animal-derived therapeutic to the distribution of amino acids in human antibody sequences (Figure 2D, Table 2E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMeasures such as the DI and the aggregation propensity risk score rely on hydrophobicity scales and charge annotations, and these parameters alone contain useful information.
“Measures such as the DI and the aggregation propensity risk score rely on the hydrophobicity scales and charge annotations, demonstrating that there is useful information in these parameters alone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationGeneration of ADAs is a multi-factorial issue and depends upon patients' genetic background and disease history as well as quality attributes of the protein therapeutics, particularly presence of aggregates and other degradants even in very minute quantities.
“Generation of ADAs is a multi-factorial issue and depends upon patients genetic background and disease history as well as quality attributes of the protein therapeutics, particularly, presence of aggregates and other degradants even in very minute quantities [190, 191].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAn alternative approach to developability pre-selection is to use natural antibody sequences under the assumption that they have favorable biophysical properties.
“An alternative approach is to use natural antibody sequences under the assumption that they have favorable biophysical properties [13].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Raybould, 2019, Five computational developability guidelines for therapeutic antibody profiling, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Natural antibody sequences have favorable biophysical properties.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAmong Raybould et al.'s guidelines, a structure-based hydrophobicity score is calculated and compared to the distribution of the same score in naturally sourced NGS sequences.
“Among these a structure-based hydrophobicity score is calculated and the value is then compared to the distribution of the same score in naturally sourced NGS sequences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Raybould, 2019, Five computational developability guidelines for therapeutic antibody profiling, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenDevelopment of computational methods to aid antibody engineering relies on successful exploration and exploitation of new data sources.
“Development of computational methods to aid antibody engineering relies on successful exploration and exploitation of new data sources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHumanized and even fully human antibodies can elicit immune responses among patients receiving such medicines and generate ADAs against them.
“Indeed, humanized and even fully human antibodies can elicit immune responses among the patients receiving such medicines and generate ADAs against them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLauer and co-workers derived a developability index (DI) from a 2-year measurement of biophysical properties for 12 antibodies and demonstrated that it correlated well with favorable biophysical properties of their antibodies.
“Lauer and co/workers carried out a 2-year long measurement of biophysical properties for 12 antibodies [148] from which they derived a score, the developability index (DI), and demonstrated that it correlated well with the favorable biophysical properties of their antibodies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [148] Lauer, 2012, Developability index: a rapid in silico tool for the screening of antibody aggregation propensity, J Pharm Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe absence of the L chain means that nanobody CDRs are distinct from those of antibodies in both sequence and structure, and as a result nanobodies are able to bind antibody-inaccessible epitopes in enzyme active sites, viral capsids and G protein coupled receptors.
“The absence of the L chain means that the nanobody’s CDRs are distinct from those of antibodies in both sequence and structure, and as a result nanobodies are able to bind antibody-inaccessible epitopes in enzyme active sites, viral capsids and G protein coupled receptors [233, 234].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [233] Staus, 2016, Allosteric nanobodies reveal the dynamic range and diverse mechanisms of G-protein-coupled receptor activation, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [234] Steyaert, 2011, Nanobody stabilization of G protein-coupled receptor conformational states, Curr Opin Struct Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIncreasing amount of data from next generation sequencing holds the potential to improve the computational methods and thus its applicability to therapeutic design.
“Increasing amount of data from next generation sequencing holds the potential to improve the computational methods and thus its applicability to therapeutic design.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationNanobody paratopes contain on average nearly three additional residues, and the paratope is drawn from a wider set of aligned sequence positions than classical antibody VH domain paratopes, comparable to the set used by the entire VH-VL paratope.
“Perhaps more significant in terms of challenges to computational modelling tools is that nanobody paratopes contain on average nearly three additional residues, and moreover the paratope is drawn from a wider set of aligned sequence positions than classical antibody VH domain paratopes, comparable to the set used by the entire VH-VL paratope [230, 232].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenExisting computational antibody design knowledge and tools may benefit emerging biotherapeutic modalities akin to antibodies, such as nanobodies.
“Existing computational antibody design knowledge and tools may benefit emerging biotherapeutic modalities akin to antibodies, such as nanobodies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenPredicting interface information can provide an initial guide for experimental epitope mapping efforts or offer a starting point for a therapeutic campaign by providing the basis for focused surface display libraries to design a novel antibody binder for a given epitope.
“Predicting interface information can provide an initial guide for experimental epitope mapping efforts or offer a starting point for a therapeutic campaign by providing the basis for focused surface display libraries to design a novel antibody binder for a given epitope.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNanobodies are naturally occurring H chain only antibodies in camelids and sharks.
“One of the most promising is the H chain only antibody, or nanobody that are naturally occurring in camelids (llamas, alpacas and camels) [27] and sharks [228, 229] (reviewed by Muyldermans [230] and Bannas et al. [27]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [27] Bannas, 2017, Nanobodies and nanobody-based human heavy chain antibodies as antitumor therapeutics, Front Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [228] Feige, 2014, The structural analysis of shark IgNAR antibodies reveals evolutionary principles of immunoglobulins, Proc Natl Acad Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [229] Griffiths, 2013, Shark variable new antigen receptor (VNAR) single domain antibody fragments: stability and diagnostic applications, Antibodies source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [230] Muyldermans, 2013, Nanobodies: natural single-domain antibodies, Annu Rev Biochem. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenEstablished bioinformatics methods such as protein structural homology modelling and molecular docking can be readily applied to the specific case of antibodies in a therapeutic setting.
“Established bioinformatics methods such as protein structural homology modelling and molecular docking can be readily applied to the specific case of antibodies in a therapeutic setting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningDespite the similarity between antibodies and nanobodies, systematic benchmarking will still be needed to determine whether development of nanobodies can benefit from computational antibody protocols in their current form or whether they need to be adjusted accordingly.
“However, despite the similarity between antibodies and nanobodies, systematic benchmarking will still be needed to determine whether development of nanobodies can benefit from computational antibody protocols in their current form or whether they need to be adjusted accordingly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAntibody-specific benchmarking challenges will emphasize the shortcomings and advantages of each method and enable improvements to be developed in a focused manner, specifically with regard to their utility in therapeutic development process.
“Antibody-specific benchmarking challenges will emphasize the shortcomings and advantages of each method and enable improvements to be developed in a focused manner, specifically with regard to their utility in therapeutic development process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationBenchmarking of bioinformatic antibody methods on a par with existing protein-generic initiatives such as CASP, CAPRI or CAMEO will benefit the entire computational antibody field.
“Holistically, benchmarking of bioinformatic antibody methods on a par with existing protein-generic initiatives such as CASP, CAPRI or CAMEO [237] will benefit the entire computational antibody field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [237] Haas, 2018, Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO) complementing the critical assessment of structure prediction in CASP12, Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenThe largest added value of computational methods will continue to be in providing time and cost-efficient ways of guiding experimental methods.
“Indeed, their largest added value will continue to be in providing time and cost-efficient ways of guiding experimental methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Current approaches to bring antibody therapeutics to market have remained experimentally focused, with animal immunization and surface display technologies accounting for the majority of molecules developed to date.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnalysis of antibodies derived from 600 donors followed by construction of a library based on natural positional preferences has demonstrated that such constraints can be adapted to library construction and used to identify binding antibodies.
“This has already been demonstrated to some extent through analysis of antibodies derived from 600 donors [24] followed by construction of a library based on natural positional preferences [26].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [24] Glanville, 2009, Precise determination of the diversity of a combinatorial antibody library gives insight into the human immunoglobulin repertoire, Proc. Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26] Zhai, 2011, Synthetic antibodies designed on natural sequence landscapes, J Mol Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe increasing amount of antibody-specific data in the public domain facilitates the maturation of computational antibody design methods, resulting in a growing uptake as part of standard pharmaceutical discovery processes.
“The increasing amount of antibody-specific data in the public domain facilitates the maturation of computational antibody design methods, resulting in a growing uptake as part of standard pharmaceutical discovery processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCDRH3 loop residues that are highly variable in both sequence and structure dominate antigen-contacting residues within nanobodies, suggesting that the nanobody-antigen interface will be difficult to model using tools that have been developed in the context of classical antibody VH domains.
“CDRH3 loop residues that are highly variable in both sequence and structure dominate antigen-contacting residues within nanobodies, suggesting that the nanobody-antigen interface will be difficult to model using tools that have been developed in the context of classical antibody VH domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenFurther progress in the development of antibody-specific computational tools will be associated with access to more and diverse data in the public domain.
“Further progress in the development of antibody-specific computational tools will be associated with access to more and diverse data in the public domain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenComputational antibody methods might be transferable to other immunoglobulin formats such as nanobodies, which have more potential in certain therapeutic areas.
“Computational antibody methods might be transferable to other immunoglobulin formats such as nanobodies, which have more potential in certain therapeutic areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenExploiting the vast amount of data generated by NGS will facilitate the derivation of more reliable 'humanness' and 'developability' profiles with which to guide antibody therapeutic discovery.
“Exploiting the vast amount of data generated by NGS will facilitate the derivation of more reliable ‘humanness’ and ‘developability’ profiles with which to guide antibody therapeutic discovery.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSystematic benchmarking of the tools can emphasize the advantages of computational methods and where these can be used to support therapeutic pipelines.
“Systematic benchmarking of the tools can emphasize the advantages of computational methods and where these can be used to support therapeutic pipelines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenStructural modelling can offer insight on exposed residues to be used for mutagenesis to either optimize binding, reduce immunogenicity or provide information on hydrophobicity patches related to detrimental biophysical properties.
“Structural modelling can offer insight on exposed residues to be used for mutagenesis to either optimize binding, reduce immunogenicity or provide information on hydrophobicity patches related to detrimental biophysical properties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenFurther development of bioinformatic methods for NGS analysis will depend as much on improving the algorithms as on the quality of the data itself.
“At this stage, further development of bioinformatic methods for NGS analysis will depend as much on improving the algorithms as on the quality of the data itself.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationNanobodies exhibit less sequence and structure variation across their framework regions, and similar levels of sequence variation as classical antibodies within the CDRH1 and CDRH2 loops.
“Specifically, nanobodies were found to exhibit less sequence and structure variation across their framework regions, and similar levels of sequence variation as classical antibodies within the CDRH1 and CDRH2 loops [232].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [232] Mitchell, 2018, Comparative analysis of nanobody sequence and structure data, Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma source
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Experimentally determining the 3D structure of the antibody–antigen complex using X-ray crystallography is the gold standard for obtaining atomic-level epitope–paratope interaction information.
“The ‘gold standard’ for obtaining this information is by experimentally determining the 3D structure of the antibody–antigen complex using X-ray crystallography.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Experimental structural methods are very time and resource consuming and their success is not guaranteed.
“Experimental methods can be very time and resource consuming with success not being guaranteed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Understanding epitope–paratope interactions at the atomic level is key to rational development of effective therapeutics.
“Understanding the epitope–paratope interactions at the atomic level is key to rational development of effective therapeutics.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Natural antibody sequences have favorable biophysical properties.
“An alternative approach is to use natural antibody sequences under the assumption that they have favorable biophysical properties [13].”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most NGS datasets produced to date do not offer paired H and L chain sequences.
“In addition, most of the NGS datasets produced to date do not offer paired H and L chain sequences.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The VL domain is much less structurally variable.
“Given that the VL domain is much less structurally variable, this suggests that the application of computational structural modelling tools to nanobody–antigen interactions will require innovation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current approaches to bring antibody therapeutics to market have remained experimentally focused, with animal immunization and surface display technologies accounting for the majority of molecules developed to date.
“Current approaches to bring these molecules to the market have remained experimentally focused, with animal immunization and surface display technologies accounting for the majority of molecules developed to date.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is very challenging to design antibodies that have a desired binding affinity with antigens.
“Despite the broad application potentials of Ab therapy, it is very challenging to design Abs that have a desired binding affinity with antigens [3].”
From Deep geometric representations for modeling effects of mutations on protein-protein binding affinity (2021) · cites this paper as [3]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Table 2E is cited but not present
MinorThe text directs readers to Table 2E for humanization methods, but Table 2 has no E section; its humanization entries appear under the D heading.
“Thus, statistical approaches to assess the ‘humanness’ of the query sequence have been developed (Figure 2D and Table 2E).”
“| D. Antibody Design | Role | Link | Reference |”
Cites
Berman, H. M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · Cited by 40,196 · see citing works
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., et al. (2016) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 · Cited by 18,423 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Such efforts are exemplified by AIRR community, which aims to standardize the increasing amount of antibody NGS depositions and their metadata [213], and from a broader perspective by the adoption of scientific data management principles such as FAIR [238].”
BackgroundDatabase resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information: update
Wheeler, D. L. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh073 · Cited by 10,691 · see citing works
Somatic generation of antibody diversity
Tonegawa, S. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/302575a0 · Cited by 4,005 · see citing works
The ClusPro web server for protein–protein docking
Kozakov, D., Hall, D. R., Xia, B., Porter, K. A., Padhorny, D., Yueh, C., Beglov, D., & Vajda, S. (2017) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.169 · Cited by 3,297 · cited 4× · see citing works
“antibody-specific ClusPro [8, 126], SnugDock [9, 89] and general protein HADDOCK [131, 132], ZDOCK [130]) and the scoring step, where the conformations are ranked according to a specific scoring function (e.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSomatic generation of antibody diversity.
Matthyssens, G., Hozumi, N., & Tonegawa, S. (1976) · PubMed · Cited by 3,237 · see citing works
HADDOCK: A Protein−Protein Docking Approach Based on Biochemical or Biophysical Information
Dominguez, C., Boelens, R., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja026939x · Cited by 3,187 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Examples of such methods are for example Swarmdock [136], HADDOCK [132] and SnugDock [9].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationPatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking
Schneidman-Duhovny, D., Inbar, Y., Nussinov, R., & Wolfson, H. J. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki481 · Cited by 3,018 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In fact, some docking methods such as ClusPro and PatchDock are able to automatically define the antibody CDRs in order to use this information during the docking process.”
MethodA hierarchical approach to all‐atom protein loop prediction
Jacobson, M. P., Pincus, D. L., Rapp, C. S., Day, T., Honig, B. H., Shaw, D. E., & Friesner, R. A. (2004) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10613 · Cited by 2,541 · see citing works
Nanobodies: natural single-domain antibodies
Muyldermans, S. (2013) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-063011-092449 · Cited by 2,304 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Furthermore, the nanobody CDRH3 loop is on average three to four residues longer than its antibody counterpart, and significantly more diverse in terms of both primary sequence and tertiary structure configuration, defying the canonical antibody VH-domain-based rules and enabling nanobody CDRH3 loops to exhibit finger…”
BackgroundInfluentialEngineered antibody fragments and the rise of single domains
Holliger, P., & Hudson, P. J. (2005) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1142 · Cited by 1,928 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Some of these include Fab domains and other modular formats with single chain Fvs (scFv) (linked VH and VL domains) as the main component, e.g. scFv, (scFv)2, diabody and minibody (reviewed by Holliger and Hudson [38], Farajnia et al. [39] and Kwon et al. [40]).”
BackgroundLeaver-Fay (2011) · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-381270-4.00019-6 · Cited by 1,904 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The new CDRs are grafted onto a framework and the structures are energyminimized by well-established energy functions such as RosettaEnergy [183] or CHARMM [182].”
MethodMiXCR: software for comprehensive adaptive immunity profiling
Bolotin, D. A., Poslavskii, S., Mitrophanov, I., Shugay, M., Mamedov, I. Z., Putintseva, E. V., & Chudakov, D. M. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3364 · Cited by 1,730 · see citing works
Modeller: Generation and Refinement of Homology-Based Protein Structure Models
Fiser, A., & Šali, A. (2003) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(03)74020-8 · Cited by 1,684 · cited 1× · see citing works
“homology modelling [6, 7], protein–protein docking [8, 9] or protein interface prediction [10] are already used for rational antibody design [11–13].”
MethodStructure of a nanobody-stabilized active state of the β2 adrenoceptor
Rasmussen, S. G. F., Choi, H., Fung, J. J., Pardon, E., Casarosa, P., Chae, P. S., DeVree, B. T., Rosenbaum, D. M., Thian, F. S., Kobilka, T. S., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09648 · Cited by 1,663 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Furthermore, the nanobody CDRH3 loop is on average three to four residues longer than its antibody counterpart, and significantly more diverse in terms of both primary sequence and tertiary structure configuration, defying the canonical antibody VH-domain-based rules and enabling nanobody CDRH3 loops to exhibit finger…”
BackgroundSoftware for molecular docking: a review
Pagadala, N. S., Syed, K., & Tuszynski, J. (2017) · Biophysical Reviews · doi:10.1007/s12551-016-0247-1 · Cited by 1,522 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This issue is addressed by antibody–antigen docking, a specialized application of the broader field of molecular docking [170] (Figure 2B).”
BackgroundCanonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins
Chothia, C., & Lesk, A. M. (1987) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(87)90412-8 · Cited by 1,406 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Despite the intrinsic sequence diversity in the CDRs, all hypervariable loops with the exception of CDRH3 adopt a constrained set of conformations termed canonical classes [32].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialReplacing the complementarity-determining regions in a human antibody with those from a mouse
Jones, P. T., Dear, P. H., Foote, J., Neuberger, M. S., & Winter, G. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/321522a0 · Cited by 1,406 · see citing works
ZDOCK: An initial‐stage protein‐docking algorithm
Chen, R., Li, L., & Weng, Z. (2003) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10389 · Cited by 1,393 · cited 3× · see citing works
“antibody-specific ClusPro [8, 126], SnugDock [9, 89] and general protein HADDOCK [131, 132], ZDOCK [130]) and the scoring step, where the conformations are ranked according to a specific scoring function (e.”
BackgroundMethodWu, T. T., & Kabat, E. A. (1970) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.132.2.211 · Cited by 1,340 · see citing works
Improved prediction of protein side‐chain conformations with SCWRL4
Krivov, G. G., Shapovalov, M. V., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2009) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22488 · Cited by 1,312 · see citing works
Brochet, X., Lefranc, M., & Giudicelli, V. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn316 · Cited by 1,220 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This can be achieved by programs such as IgBLAST [68] or IMGT VQuest [69] and multiple other tools aimed at processing raw antibody data (Table 2A, reviewed in [150]).”
MethodIgBLAST: an immunoglobulin variable domain sequence analysis tool
Ye, J., Ma, N., Madden, T., & Ostell, J. M. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt382 · Cited by 1,161 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This can be achieved by programs such as IgBLAST [68] or IMGT VQuest [69] and multiple other tools aimed at processing raw antibody data (Table 2A, reviewed in [150]).”
MethodThe PDBbind database: methodologies and updates
Wang, R., Fang, X., Lu, Y., Yang, C.-Y., & Wang, S. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm048957q · Cited by 933 · cited 5× · see citing works
“According to SAbDab, of the approximately 150 000 structures deposited in the PDB to date as many as 3500 are identified as containing at least one antibody (or nanobody) chain.”
MethodInfluentialChange-O: a toolkit for analyzing large-scale B cell immunoglobulin repertoire sequencing data
Gupta, N. T., Heiden, J. A. V., Uduman, M., Gadala-Maria, D., Yaari, G., & Kleinstein, S. H. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv359 · Cited by 869 · see citing works
Protein–Sol: a web tool for predicting protein solubility from sequence
Hebditch, M., Carballo‐Amador, M. A., Charonis, S. A., Curtis, R., & Warwicker, J. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx345 · Cited by 867 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Several generic predictors of solubility and APRs in proteins have been developed [208, 209] and though these have been successfully applied to antibodies [206], antibody-specific protocols addressing these issues also exist [204, 210].”
BackgroundDatabase Resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information
Coordinators, N. R. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1071 · Cited by 817 · see citing works
Protein aggregation—Pathways and influencing factors
Wang, W., Nema, S., & Teagarden, D. L. (2010) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.02.025 · Cited by 808 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Several generic predictors of solubility and APRs in proteins have been developed [208, 209] and though these have been successfully applied to antibodies [206], antibody-specific protocols addressing these issues also exist [204, 210].”
BackgroundGRAMM-X public web server for protein-protein docking
Tovchigrechko, A., & Vakser, I. A. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkl206 · Cited by 807 · see citing works
Diversity in the CDR3 Region of VH Is Sufficient for Most Antibody Specificities
Xu, J. L., & Davis, M. M. (2000) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/s1074-7613(00)00006-6 · Cited by 779 · cited 1× · see citing works
“of the six CDRs [33] and is very important for antigen recognition [34, 35].”
BackgroundEfficient Unbound Docking of Rigid Molecules
Duhovny, D., Nussinov, R., & Wolfson, H. J. (2002) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45784-4_14 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
Knappik, A., Ge, L., Honegger, A., Pack, P., Fischer, M., Wellnhofer, G., Hoess, A., Wölle, J., Plückthun, A., & Virnekäs, B. (2000) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.3444 · Cited by 728 · cited 1× · see citing works
“during development of monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics [36, 37].”
BackgroundReliable B cell epitope predictions: impacts of method development and improved benchmarking
Kringelum, J. V., Lundegaard, C., Lund, O., & Nielsen, M. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002829 · Cited by 697 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Accurate delineation of an epitope is an important step in characterizing the function of an antibody [161] (Figure 2B).”
BackgroundThe European nucleotide archive
Leinonen, R., Akhtar, R., Birney, E., Bower, L., Cerdeno-Tarraga, A., Cheng, Y., Cleland, I., Faruque, N., Goodgame, N., Gibson, R., et al. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq967 · Cited by 690 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Tools such as DIGIT and Abysis source their data from the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) [60] and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) [61]; their sequence volumes are of the order of 105 and contain multiple artificially engineered sequences.”
MethodFireDock: Fast interaction refinement in molecular docking
Andrusier, N., Nussinov, R., & Wolfson, H. J. (2007) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21495 · Cited by 680 · cited 2× · see citing works
“antibody-specific DockSorter [110] and general protein ZRANK [171], FireDock [172], SIPPER[173]) to discriminate models that are closer to the native conformation.”
BackgroundSAbDab: the structural antibody database
Dunbar, J., Krawczyk, K., Leem, J., Baker, T., Fuchs, A., Georges, G., Shi, J., & Deane, C. M. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1043 · Cited by 674 · cited 3× · see citing works
“This is typically achieved by finding close sequence matches to the H and L chains in available databases [16].”
BackgroundSelf-citationHexServer: an FFT-based protein docking server powered by graphics processors
Macindoe, G., Mavridis, L., Venkatraman, V., Devignes, M., & Ritchie, D. W. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq311 · Cited by 670 · see citing works
The promise and challenge of high-throughput sequencing of the antibody repertoire
Georgiou, G., Ippolito, G. C., Beausang, J., Busse, C. E., Wardemann, H., & Quake, S. R. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2782 · Cited by 652 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In this respect, the field currently benefits from a steady stream of new data from NGS of B-cell Receptors (BCRs, to be used as proxy for antibodies) [212, 213] and there is an increasing number of resources available for downloading such data [17], which are being used to analyze therapeutic antibodies [13].”
BackgroundPerelson, A. S., & OSTER, G. F. (1979) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(79)90275-3 · Cited by 648 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Such constraints can be readily adapted to library construction and used to identify binding antibodies (Figure 2E) [226].”
BackgroundThe immune epitope database 2.0
Vita, R., Zarebski, L., Greenbaum, J. A., Emami, H., Hoof, I., Salimi, N., Damle, R., Sette, A., & Peters, B. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp1004 · Cited by 631 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Other resources such as the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) [18] link structural information to experimentally derived epitope data.”
BackgroundMethodPrediction of residues in discontinuous B‐cell epitopes using protein 3D structures
Andersen, P. H., Nielsen, M., & Lund, O. (2006) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.062405906 · Cited by 631 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The majority of epitopes are conformational in nature therefore predictors that use structural antigen information offer more accurate results than linear methods [165, 166].”
BackgroundBiophysical properties of the clinical-stage antibody landscape
Jain, T., Sun, T., Durand, S., Hall, A., Houston, N. R., Nett, J. H., Sharkey, B., Bobrowicz, B., Caffry, I., Yu, Y., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1616408114 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
HADDOCK versus HADDOCK: New features and performance of HADDOCK2.0 on the CAPRI targets
de Vries, S. D., van Dijk, A. V., Krzeminski, M., van Dijk, M. V., Thureau, A., Hsu, V. L., Wassenaar, T., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2007) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21723 · Cited by 583 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Examples of such methods are for example Swarmdock [136], HADDOCK [132] and SnugDock [9].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationIMGT®, the international ImMunoGeneTics information system® 25 years on
Lefranc, M., Giudicelli, V., Duroux, P., Jabado-Michaloud, J., Folch, G., Aouinti, S., Carillon, E., Duvergey, H., Houles, A., Paysan‐Lafosse, T., et al. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1056 · Cited by 582 · cited 6× · see citing works
“org/ Leading antibody genetics database [46]”
MethodInfluentialNanobodies and nanobody-based human heavy chain antibodies as antitumor therapeutics
Bannas, P., Hambach, J., & Koch-Nolte, F. (2017) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01603 · Cited by 572 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The accumulated methodology of computational antibody protocols could potentially be applied to novel antibody formats with intrinsically better biophysical properties, such as nanobodies [27].”
BackgroundCommonality despite exceptional diversity in the baseline human antibody repertoire
Briney, B., Inderbitzin, A., Joyce, C., & Burton, D. R. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0879-y · Cited by 544 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Together with the diversity introduced by V(D) J recombination, somatic hypermutation can produce an estimated 1012–1015 possible antibody sequences [23, 24].”
BackgroundInfluentialThe structural basis of antibody–antigen recognition
Sela-Culang, I., Kunik, V., & Ofran, Y. (2013) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2013.00302 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
The CamSol method of rational design of protein mutants with enhanced solubility
Sormanni, P., Aprile, F. A., & Vendruscolo, M. (2015) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2014.09.026 · Cited by 494 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Good solubility is crucial [202, 203] to avoid aggregation that can potentially lead to loss of activity, degradation of antibodies or immunogenicity, as discussed previously.”
BackgroundAntibody-antigen Interactions: Contact Analysis and Binding Site Topography
MacCallum, R. M., Martin, A. C. R., & Thornton, J. M. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0548 · Cited by 473 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Additional numbering schemes such as Contact [154], North [155], WolfGuy [107] and Aho [43] exist but these are less prevalent.”
BackgroundHeiden, J. A. V., Yaari, G., Uduman, M., Stern, J. N. H., O’Connor, K. C., Hafler, D. A., Vigneault, F., & Kleinstein, S. H. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu138 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
ZRANK: Reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function
Pierce, B., & Weng, Z. (2007) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21373 · Cited by 468 · cited 2× · see citing works
“antibody-specific DockSorter [110] and general protein ZRANK [171], FireDock [172], SIPPER[173]) to discriminate models that are closer to the native conformation.”
BackgroundAn overview of bioinformatics tools for epitope prediction: Implications on vaccine development
Soria‐Guerra, R. E., Nieto‐Gómez, R., Govea‐Alonso, D. O., & Rosales‐Mendoza, S. (2014) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2014.11.003 · Cited by 441 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Prediction of Tcell epitopes is addressed by machine learning approaches, particularly, neural networks-based methods that often rely on evaluating the binding affinity of a given short peptide towards MHC-I or II [192, 193].”
BackgroundGlanville, J., Zhai, W., Berka, J., Telman, D., Huerta, G., Mehta, G. R., Ni, I., Mei, L., Sundar, P. D., Day, G. M. R., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0909775106 · Cited by 440 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Together with the diversity introduced by V(D) J recombination, somatic hypermutation can produce an estimated 1012–1015 possible antibody sequences [23, 24].”
BackgroundSomatic Hypermutation of Immunoglobulin Genes Is Linked to Transcription Initiation
Peters, A., & Storb, U. (1996) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80298-8 · Cited by 426 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Upon antigen exposure, the antibodyproducing B-cells undergo a natural process of affinity maturation, based on somatic hypermutation [31].”
BackgroundANARCI: antigen receptor numbering and receptor classification
Dunbar, J., & Deane, C. M. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv552 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
High-throughput sequencing of the paired human immunoglobulin heavy and light chain repertoire
DeKosky, B. J., Ippolito, G. C., Deschner, R. P., Lavinder, J. J., Wine, Y., Rawlings, B. M., Varadarajan, N., Giesecke, C., Dörner, T., Andrews, S. F., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2492 · Cited by 410 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The NGS databases typically offer only the unpaired heavy and light chains; however, as the paired NGS technology becomes more mainstream, it is to be expected that such data will also become publicly available [63, 64].”
BackgroundMethodJankauskaitė, J., Jiménez-García, B., Dapkūnas, J., Fernández-Recio, J., & Moal, I. H. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty635 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Passive immunity in prevention and treatment of infectious diseases
Keller, M. A., & Stiehm, E. R. (2000) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.13.4.602 · Cited by 388 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Identification of antigen-specific antibodies after immunization can readily inform vaccine design since such antibodies can be used to confer passive immunity [218].”
BackgroundA new clustering of antibody CDR loop conformations
North, B., Lehmann, A., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2011) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.030 · Cited by 380 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[155], WolfGuy [107] and Aho [43] exist but these are less prevalent.”
BackgroundAn Introduction to B-Cell Epitope Mapping and In Silico Epitope Prediction
Potocnakova, L., Bhide, M. R., & Pulzová, L. (2016) · Journal of Immunology Research · doi:10.1155/2016/6760830 · Cited by 371 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To achieve such goals, epitopes can be identified by various experimental methods [163] or be predicted by computational protocols [164].”
BackgroundIn-depth determination and analysis of the human paired heavy- and light-chain antibody repertoire
DeKosky, B. J., Kojima, T., Rodin, A., Charab, W., Ippolito, G. C., Ellington, A. D., & Georgiou, G. (2014) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3743 · Cited by 358 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Further development of single-cell technology to provide paired NGS data [64, 227] will expand our ability to query the immune system by compu-”
MethodFive computational developability guidelines for therapeutic antibody profiling
Raybould, M. I. J., Marks, C., Krawczyk, K., Taddese, B., Nowak, J., Lewis, A. P., Bujotzek, A., Shi, J., & Deane, C. M. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1810576116 · Cited by 357 · cited 6× · see citing works
“In this respect, the field currently benefits from a steady stream of new data from NGS of B-cell Receptors (BCRs, to be used as proxy for antibodies) [212, 213] and there is an increasing number of resources available for downloading such data [17], which are being used to analyze therapeutic antibodies [13].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationImpact of Product-Related Factors on Immunogenicity of Biotherapeutics
Singh, S. K. (2011) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.22276 · Cited by 350 · cited 1× · see citing works
“therapeutics, particularly, presence of aggregates and other degradants even in very minute quantities [190, 191].”
BackgroundComputational design of antibody-affinity improvement beyond in vivo maturation
Lippow, S. M., Wittrup, K. D., & Tidor, B. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1336 · Cited by 342 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The seminal work on the subject was published by Lippow and co-workers, who computationally improved the binding of an antibody against its target, starting from an existing structural complex [181].”
BackgroundStaus, D. P., Strachan, R. T., Manglik, A., Pani, B., Kahsai, A. W., Kim, T. H., Wingler, L. M., Ahn, S., Chatterjee, A., Masoudi, A., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18636 · Cited by 330 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The absence of the L chain means that the nanobody’s CDRs are distinct from those of antibodies in both sequence and structure, and as a result nanobodies are able to bind antibody-inaccessible epitopes in enzyme active sites, viral capsids and G protein coupled receptors [233, 234].”
BackgroundJiménez‐García, B., Pons, C., & Fernández‐Recio, J. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt262 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Structural analysis of B-cell epitopes in antibody: protein complexes
Kringelum, J. V., Nielsen, M., Padkjær, S. B., & Lund, O. (2013) · Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2012.06.001 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
High frequency of shared clonotypes in human B cell receptor repertoires
Soto, C., Bombardi, R. G., Branchizio, A., Kose, N., Matta, P., Sevy, A. M., Sinkovits, R. S., Gilchuk, P., Finn, J. A., & Crowe, J. E. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0934-8 · Cited by 294 · cited 1× · see citing works
“From a sequence perspective, it was demonstrated recently that despite the vast numbers of diverse sequences in a typical human antibody repertoire, a non-trivial amount of these is shared between individuals [23, 223].”
BackgroundReddy, S. T., Ge, X., Miklos, A. E., Hughes, R. A., Kang, S. H., Hoi, K. H., Chrysostomou, C., Hunicke-Smith, S. P., Iverson, B. L., Tucker, P. W., et al. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1673 · Cited by 292 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A similar approach based on identifying highly abundant sequences was used to select antigen-specific molecules in immunized mice [216].”
BackgroundSwarmDock: a server for flexible protein–protein docking
Torchala, M., Moal, I. H., Chaleil, R. A. G., Fernández‐Recio, J., & Bates, P. A. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt038 · Cited by 285 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Examples of such methods are for example Swarmdock [136], HADDOCK [132] and SnugDock [9].”
MethodMoal, I. H., & Fernández-Recio, J. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts489 · Cited by 281 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Other, more specialized, resources exist such as Ab-Bind [19], which hold data on 1101 mutations across 32 antibody complexes, and SKEMPI [55], which curates binding energy data for available structures but is not limited to antibody information only.”
BackgroundT-cell dependent immunogenicity of protein therapeutics: Preclinical assessment and mitigation
Jawa, V., Cousens, L. P., Awwad, M., Wakshull, E., Kropshofer, H., & Groot, A. S. D. (2013) · Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.clim.2013.09.006 · Cited by 271 · cited 1× · see citing works
“can be particularly useful [194] for initial triaging of the”
BackgroundModeling and docking of antibody structures with Rosetta
Weitzner, B. D., Jeliazkov, J. R., Lyskov, S., Marze, N. A., Kuroda, D., Frick, R., Adolf‐Bryfogle, J., Biswas, N., Dunbrack, R. L., & Gray, J. J. (2017) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.180 · Cited by 266 · cited 9× · see citing works
“Examples of such methods are for example Swarmdock [136], HADDOCK [132] and SnugDock [9].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEhrenmann, F., Kaas, Q., & Lefranc, M. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Res. · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp946 · Cited by 261 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Resources that mine the PDB for antibody fragments such as canonical classes (PyIgClassify [51]), antibody–antigen interaction data (PCLICK [50]) or their entire structures (IMGT/3D-Structure-DB [66], Structural Antibody Database (SabDAb [16]), Abysis [47] and AbDb [52]) exist.”
BackgroundAGGRESCAN3D (A3D): server for prediction of aggregation properties of protein structures
Zambrano, R., Jamróz, M. H., Szczasiuk, A., Pujols, J., Kmiecik, S., & Ventura, S. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv359 · Cited by 250 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Several generic predictors of solubility and APRs in proteins have been developed [208, 209] and though these have been successfully applied to antibodies [206], antibody-specific protocols addressing these issues also exist [204, 210].”
BackgroundHonegger, A., & Plückthun, A. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2001.4662 · Cited by 249 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Additional numbering schemes such as Contact [154], North [155], WolfGuy [107] and Aho [43] exist but these are less prevalent.”
BackgroundCaplacizumab: First Global Approval
Duggan, S. T. (2018) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-018-0989-0 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Kovaltsuk, A., Leem, J., Kelm, S., Snowden, J., Deane, C. M., & Krawczyk, K. (2018) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1800708 · Cited by 247 · cited 5× · see citing works
“In this respect, the field currently benefits from a steady stream of new data from NGS of B-cell Receptors (BCRs, to be used as proxy for antibodies) [212, 213] and there is an increasing number of resources available for downloading such data [17], which are being used to analyze therapeutic antibodies [13].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationMartin, A. C. R., & Thornton, J. M. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0617 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Kaplon, H., & Reichert, J. M. (2018) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2018.1415671 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
High-throughput immune repertoire analysis with IGoR
Marcou, Q., Mora, T., & Walczak, A. M. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-02832-w · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Greenbaum, J. A., Andersen, P. H., Blythe, M., Bui, H., Cachau, R. E., Crowe, J., Davies, M., Kolaskar, A. S., Lund, O., Morrison, S., et al. (2007) · Journal of Molecular Recognition · doi:10.1002/jmr.815 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
ABodyBuilder: automated antibody structure prediction with data-driven accuracy estimation
Leem, J., Dunbar, J., Georges, G., Shi, J., & Deane, C. M. (2016) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2016.1205773 · Cited by 238 · cited 3× · see citing works
“PIGS [86], AbodyBuilder [84]; as commercial packages, e.”
BackgroundNanobody stabilization of G protein-coupled receptor conformational states
Steyaert, J., & Kobilka, B. K. (2011) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2011.06.011 · Cited by 234 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The absence of the L chain means that the nanobody’s CDRs are distinct from those of antibodies in both sequence and structure, and as a result nanobodies are able to bind antibody-inaccessible epitopes in enzyme active sites, viral capsids and G protein coupled receptors [233, 234].”
BackgroundAnalysis and improvements to Kabat and structurally correct numbering of antibody variable domains
Abhinandan, K. R., & Martin, A. C. R. (2008) · Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2008.05.022 · Cited by 234 · cited 2× · see citing works
“To the best of our knowledge, there are three freely available software packages to perform numbering of antibodies, ANARCI [83], Abnum [82] and AbRSA[81], to act as the first step in computational antibody analysis such as homology modelling.”
MethodComparative analysis of nanobody sequence and structure data
Mitchell, L. S., & Colwell, L. J. (2018) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25497 · Cited by 233 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Specifically, nanobodies were found to exhibit less sequence and structure variation across their framework regions, and similar levels of sequence variation as classical antibodies within the CDRH1 and CDRH2 loops [232].”
BackgroundInfluentialRosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD): a general framework for computational antibody design
Adolf-Bryfogle, J., Kalyuzhniy, O., Kubitz, M., Weitzner, B. D., Hu, X., Adachi, Y., Schief, W. R., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006112 · Cited by 227 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Since then, four methods have been made available: OptCDR [139], OptMAVEn[140], AbDesign [143] and RosettaAntibodyDesign [142].”
MethodAlmagro, J. C., & Fransson, J. (2008) · PubMed · doi:10.2741/2786 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Modeling protein–protein and protein–peptide complexes: CAPRI 6th edition
Lensink, M. F., Velankar, S., & Wodak, S. J. (2017) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25215 · Cited by 222 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Holistically, benchmarking of bioinformatic antibody methods on a par with existing protein-generic initiatives such as CASP, CAPRI or CAMEO [237] will benefit the entire computational antibody field.”
MethodTomar, D. S., Kumar, S., Singh, S. K., Goswami, S., & Li, L. (2016) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2015.1128606 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Self-citationOrigins of specificity and affinity in antibody–protein interactions
Peng, H., Lee, K. H., Jian, J.-W., & Yang, A. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1401131111 · Cited by 209 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The antibodies have evolved to be versatile binders, capable of recognizing a wide variety of molecular surfaces [3].”
BackgroundDevelopability Index: A Rapid In Silico Tool for the Screening of Antibody Aggregation Propensity
Lauer, T. M., Agrawal, N. J., Chennamsetty, N., Egodage, K. L., Helk, B., & Trout, B. L. (2011) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.22758 · Cited by 208 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Lauer and co/workers carried out a 2-year long measurement of biophysical properties for 12 antibodies [148] from which they derived a score, the developability index (DI), and demonstrated that it correlated well with the favorable biophysical properties of their antibodies.”
BackgroundZhu, K., Day, T., Warshaviak, D., Murrett, C. S., Friesner, R., & Pearlman, D. (2014) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24551 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Application of asymmetric statistical potentials to antibody-protein docking
Brenke, R., Hall, D., Chuang, G., Comeau, S. R., Bohnuud, T., Beglov, D., Schueler-Furman, O., Vajda, S., & Kozakov, D. (2012) · Bioinform. · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts493 · Cited by 205 · cited 5× · see citing works
“homology modelling [6, 7], protein–protein docking [8, 9] or protein interface prediction [10] are already used for rational antibody design [11–13].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHumanization of murine monoclonal antibodies through variable domain resurfacing.
Roguska, M., Pedersen, J. T., Keddy, C., Henry, A. H., Searle, S. J., Lambert, J. M., Goldmacher, V. S., Blättler, W. A., Rees, A. R., & Guild, B. C. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.3.969 · Cited by 201 · cited 1× · see citing works
“immunogenic portions of the antibody would naturally be found on the surface, structural modelling can readily identify solvent-exposed positions aiding in a process called resurfacing [189].”
BackgroundPrediction of aggregation prone regions of therapeutic proteins
Chennamsetty, N., Voynov, V., Kayser, V., Helk, B., & Trout, B. L. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp911706q · Cited by 200 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The DI combines the computed hydrophobicity, SAP score [211] and net charge of the molecule into a statistical score indicating APRs.”
MethodPotential aggregation prone regions in biotherapeutics: A survey of commercial monoclonal antibodies
Wang, X., Das, T. K., Singh, S. K., & Kumar, S. (2009) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.1.3.8035 · Cited by 198 · cited 19× · see citing works
“Wang and coworkers have examined molecular sequences of commercially available mAb drug products and shown that they contain multiple well defined aggregation prone motifs often located in their CDRs [206].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationDeKosky, B. J., Lungu, O. I., Park, D., Johnson, E. L., Charab, W., Chrysostomou, C., Kuroda, D., Ellington, A. D., Ippolito, G. C., Gray, J. J., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1525510113 · Cited by 189 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The NGS databases typically offer only the unpaired heavy and light chains; however, as the paired NGS technology becomes more mainstream, it is to be expected that such data will also become publicly available [63, 64].”
BackgroundMiho, E., Yermanos, A., Weber, C. R., Berger, C. T., Reddy, S. T., & Greiff, V. (2018) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.00224 · Cited by 189 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Specifically, the recent decade saw the advent of next generation sequencing (NGS) of B-cell receptor (antibody) repertoires [22].”
BackgroundSivasubramanian, A., Sircar, A., Chaudhury, S., & Gray, J. J. (2008) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22309 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
abYsis: integrated antibody sequence and structure-management, analysis, and prediction
Swindells, M. B., Porter, C. T., Couch, M., Hurst, J., Abhinandan, K. R., Nielsen, J. H., Macindoe, G., Hetherington, J., & Martin, A. C. R. (2017) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2016.08.019 · Cited by 184 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Tools such as DIGIT and Abysis source their data from the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) [60] and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) [61]; their sequence volumes are of the order of 105 and contain multiple artificially engineered sequences.”
BackgroundInfluentialFactors and forces controlling V(D) J recombination
Hesslein, D. G. T., & Schatz, D. G. (2001) · Advances in immunology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2776(01)78004-2 · Cited by 183 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Each of the estimated 5 × 109 B-cells in an organism [23] produces a distinct B-cell receptor (membranebound) or antibody (in soluble form) through somatic recombination of variable (V), diversity (D), joining (J) and constant (C) gene segments [28, 29].”
BackgroundGreiff, V., Bhat, P., Cook, S. C., Menzel, U., Kang, W., & Reddy, S. T. (2015) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-015-0169-8 · Cited by 181 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Further development of a larger variety of such models could result in versatile diagnostic tools for multiple conditions on the basis of an individual’s sequenced BCR repertoire [220].”
Background<scp>AB</scp> ‐Bind: Antibody binding mutational database for computational affinity predictions
Sirin, S., Apgar, J. R., Bennett, E. M., & Keating, A. E. (2016) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.2829 · Cited by 179 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Other, more specialized, resources exist such as Ab-Bind [19], which hold data on 1101 mutations across 32 antibody complexes, and SKEMPI [55], which curates binding energy data for available structures but is not limited to antibody information only.”
BackgroundCommunity, T. A., Rubelt, F., Busse, C. E., Bukhari, S. A. C., Bürckert, J.-P., Mariotti-Ferrandiz, E., Cowell, L. G., Watson, C. T., Marthandan, N., Faison, W. J., et al. (2017) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.3873 · Cited by 178 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Such efforts are exemplified by AIRR community, which aims to standardize the increasing amount of antibody NGS depositions and their metadata [213], and from a broader perspective by the adoption of scientific data management principles such as FAIR [238].”
BackgroundB cells enhance early innate immune responses during bacterial sepsis
Kelly‐Scumpia, K. M., Scumpia, P. O., Weinstein, J. S., Delano, M. J., Cuenca, A. G., Nacionales, D. C., Wynn, J. L., Lee, P. Y., Kumagai, Y., Efron, P. A., et al. (2011) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20101715 · Cited by 174 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Antibodies are immune system proteins that recognize the surfaces of foreign molecules (antigens) for subsequent elimination from the organism during an adaptive immune response [1] or self-antigens from healthy tissues in autoimmune diseases [2].”
BackgroundPIGS: automatic prediction of antibody structures
Marcatili, P., Rosi, A., & Tramontano, A. L. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn341 · Cited by 174 · cited 2× · see citing works
“PIGS [86], AbodyBuilder [84]; as commercial packages, e.”
BackgroundImproving B-cell epitope prediction and its application to global antibody–antigen docking
Krawczyk, K., Liu, X., Baker, T., Shi, J., & Deane, C. M. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu190 · Cited by 174 · cited 3× · see citing works
“We summarize the linear and conformational epitope predictors in Supplementary Information and those following the new paradigm of including antibody in providing epitope predictions (antibody-specific predictors) in Table 2C. Antibodyspecific epitope prediction was first addressed by Rapberger and co-workers in 2007…”
Methodde Kruif, J., Boel, E., & Logtenberg, T. (1995) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1995.0204 · Cited by 173 · cited 1× · see citing works
“during development of monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics [36, 37].”
BackgroundHaas, J., Barbato, A., Behringer, D., Studer, G., Roth, S., Bertoni, M., Mostaguir, K., Gumienny, R., & Schwede, T. (2018) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25431 · Cited by 168 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Holistically, benchmarking of bioinformatic antibody methods on a par with existing protein-generic initiatives such as CASP, CAPRI or CAMEO [237] will benefit the entire computational antibody field.”
MethodCorrie, B., Marthandan, N., Zimonja, B., Jaglale, J., Zhou, Y., Barr, E., Knoetze, N., Breden, F. M. W., Christley, S., Scott, J. K., et al. (2018) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12666 · Cited by 167 · cited 1× · see citing works
“iReceptor [49], Observed Antibody Space [17].”
Sircar, A., & Gray, J. J. (2010) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000644 · Cited by 166 · cited 4× · see citing works
“antibody-specific ClusPro [8, 126], SnugDock [9, 89] and general protein HADDOCK [131, 132], ZDOCK [130]) and the scoring step, where the conformations are ranked according to a specific scoring function (e.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialParapred: antibody paratope prediction using convolutional and recurrent neural networks
Liberis, E., Veličković, P., Sormanni, P., Vendruscolo, M., & Liò, P. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty305 · Cited by 165 · cited 4× · see citing works
“To the best of our knowledge AntibodyInterfacePrediction and AG-FastParapred are currently the best performing paratope prediction methods as compared to previously available methods; however, they were not compared against one another.”
InfluentialFREAD revisited: accurate loop structure prediction using a database search algorithm
Choi, Y., & Deane, C. M. (2010) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22658 · Cited by 161 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Antibody-specific knowledgebased approaches are fast and accurate if a template is available [103].”
BackgroundBi-specific and tri-specific antibodies- the next big thing in solid tumor therapeutics
Runcie, K. D., Budman, D. R., John, V. S., & Seetharamu, N. (2018) · Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1186/s10020-018-0051-4 · Cited by 161 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Bi- and tri-specific antibody formats aimed at solid tumors have been recently reviewed [41].”
BackgroundWAM: an improved algorithm for modelling antibodies on the WEB
Whitelegg, N., & Rees, A. R. (2000) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/13.12.819 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
FRODOCK 2.0: fast protein–protein docking server
Ramírez-Aportela, E., López‐Blanco, J. R., & Chacón, P. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw141 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Jespersen, M. C., Mahajan, S., Peters, B., Nielsen, M., & Marcatili, P. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00298 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Second antibody modeling assessment (AMA-II)
Almagro, J. C., Teplyakov, A., Luo, J., Sweet, R. W., Kodangattil, S., Hernandez‐Guzman, F., & Gilliland, G. L. (2014) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24567 · Cited by 144 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The high degree of antibody sequence and structure conservation in the framework region and the five canonical loops leads to an overall high accuracy of antibody homology modelling [7].”
BackgroundMethodResultFully automated antibody structure prediction using BIOVIA tools: Validation study
Kemmish, H., Fasnacht, M., & Yan, L. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177923 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Agrawal, N. J., Kumar, S., Wang, X., Helk, B., Singh, S. K., & Trout, B. L. (2011) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.22705 · Cited by 140 · cited 2× · see citing works
“A number of groups have reviewed the applicability of various algorithms (Figure 2D, Table 2E) available to predict APRs in biotherapeutics [204, 205].”
BackgroundSelf-citationAnalysis of nanobody paratopes reveals greater diversity than classical antibodies
Mitchell, L. S., & Colwell, L. J. (2018) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzy017 · Cited by 138 · cited 3× · see citing works
“these molecules is demonstrated by recent nanobody-specific databases and analyses [57, 58, 231, 232].”
BackgroundSelf-citationLarge-scale network analysis reveals the sequence space architecture of antibody repertoires
Miho, E., Roškar, R., Greiff, V., & Reddy, S. T. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09278-8 · Cited by 138 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Human antibody repertoires can maintain their fundamental sequence diversity despite the removal of as many as 50–90% of sequences [214].”
BackgroundPrinciples for computational design of binding antibodies
Baran, D., Pszolla, M. G., Lapidoth, G. D., Norn, C., Dym, O., Unger, T., Albeck, S., Tyka, M. D., & Fleishman, S. J. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1707171114 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Kunik, V., Ashkenazi, S., & Ofran, Y. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks480 · Cited by 132 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Recently, Antibody i-Patch and Paratome were outperformed by machine learning approaches such as the random forest-based proABC [112], support-vector machinebased AntibodyInterfacePrediction [114] and the deep learning- based, Parapred [113] and AG-Fast-Parapred [115].”
BackgroundProgress and challenges in predicting protein interfaces
Esmaielbeiki, R., Krawczyk, K., Knapp, B., Nebel, J., & Deane, C. M. (2015) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbv027 · Cited by 130 · cited 1× · see citing works
“homology modelling [6, 7], protein–protein docking [8, 9] or protein interface prediction [10] are already used for rational antibody design [11–13].”
MethodSelf-citationRalph, D., & Matsen, F. A., IV (2016) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004409 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
ABangle: characterising the VH-VL orientation in antibodies
Dunbar, J., Fuchs, A., Shi, J., & Deane, C. M. (2013) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzt020 · Cited by 125 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Specific algorithms have been developed for this and incorporated into available software packages such as AbAngle [109].”
BackgroundMethodKazi, A., Chuah, C., Majeed, A. B. A., Leow, C. H., Lim, B. H., & Leow, C. Y. (2018) · Pathogens and Global Health · doi:10.1080/20477724.2018.1446773 · Cited by 122 · cited 1× · see citing works
“From a therapeutic perspective, knowledge of the epitope can be used for rational design in targeting an immunogenic region for vaccine development [162].”
BackgroundPyIgClassify: a database of antibody CDR structural classifications
Adolf‐Bryfogle, J., Xu, Q., North, B., Lehmann, A., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1106 · Cited by 120 · cited 2× · see citing works
“edu/PyIgClassify/ Database of CDR canonical classes [51]”
BackgroundStructural consensus among antibodies defines the antigen binding site
Kunik, V., Peters, B., & Ofran, Y. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002388 · Cited by 117 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Analyses of high resolution crystal structures of antigenantibody complexes show that the framework residues can bury a substantial amount of surface area upon complex formation [159, 160].”
BackgroundCoales, S. J., Tuske, S. J., Tomasso, J. C., & Hamuro, Y. (2009) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.3921 · Cited by 115 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Additionally, inputs from experimental studies such as hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX) coupled with mass spectrometry and mutational analyses can help refine the computational models of antibody–antigen complexes [175, 176].”
BackgroundMouse Models for Assessing Protein Immunogenicity: Lessons and Challenges
Jiskoot, W., Kijanka, G., Randolph, T. W., Carpenter, J. F., Koulov, A. V., Mahler, H., Joubert, M. K., Jawa, V., & Narhi, L. O. (2016) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2016.02.031 · Cited by 115 · cited 2× · see citing works
“therapeutics, particularly, presence of aggregates and other degradants even in very minute quantities [190, 191].”
BackgroundAssessment of immune status using blood transcriptomics and potential implications for global health
Chaussabel, D. (2015) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2015.03.002 · Cited by 111 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Since the immune system is a dynamic reflection of the overall health of the organism, some antigen-specific signatures in the repertoire could be indicative of particular diseases [219].”
BackgroundAggregation risk prediction for antibodies and its application to biotherapeutic development
Obrezanova, O., Arnell, A., de la Cuesta, R. G., Berthelot, M. E., Gallagher, T. R., Zurdo, J., & Stallwood, Y. (2015) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2015.1007828 · Cited by 107 · cited 2× · see citing works
“There are also pharmaceutically focused computational approaches that aid in assessing the immunogenicity [14] and biophysical properties [15] of antibodies.”
BackgroundMethodLapidoth, G. D., Baran, D., Pszolla, G. M., Norn, C., Alon, A., Tyka, M. D., & Fleishman, S. J. (2015) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24779 · Cited by 107 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Since then, four methods have been made available: OptCDR [139], OptMAVEn[140], AbDesign [143] and RosettaAntibodyDesign [142].”
MethodKoenig, P., Lee, C. V., Walters, B. T., Janakiraman, V., Stinson, J., Patapoff, T. W., & Fuh, G. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1613231114 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Dondelinger, M., Filée, P., Sauvage, E., Quinting, B., Muyldermans, S., Galleni, M., & Vandevenne, M. S. (2018) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.02278 · Cited by 107 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Similarities between antibody amino acid sequences further allow for the creation of a standardized reference framework, or numbering scheme, giving each variable region amino acid an identifier [151].”
BackgroundIntegrative computational modeling of protein interactions
Rodrigues, J., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2014) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.12771 · Cited by 106 · cited 1× · see citing works
“docking (information-driven, local or integrative docking) [174].”
Self-citationLefranc, M. (2011) · Cold Spring Harbor Protocols · doi:10.1101/pdb.ip85 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
A molecular immunology approach to antibody humanization and functional optimization
Lazar, G. A., Desjarlais, J. R., Jacinto, J. M., Karki, S., & Hammond, P. W. (2006) · Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2006.09.029 · Cited by 104 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Since immunogenicity is mediated by short peptides on the molecule, Lazar and coworkers developed the Human String Content (HSC) score that takes into account short (9-mer) sequences along the variable region to indicate regions requiring modification to conform with the human amino acid distribution [145].”
BackgroundA Web Interface for Easy Flexible Protein-Protein Docking with ATTRACT
de Vries, S. J., Schindler, C., de Beauchêne, I. C., & Zacharias, M. (2015) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2014.12.015 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Analyzing the ‘Degree of Humanness’ of antibody sequences
Abhinandan, K. R., & Martin, A. C. R. (2007) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.02.100 · Cited by 99 · cited 2× · see citing works
“There are also pharmaceutically focused computational approaches that aid in assessing the immunogenicity [14] and biophysical properties [15] of antibodies.”
BackgroundThe H3 loop of antibodies shows unique structural characteristics
Regep, C., Georges, G., Shi, J., Popovic, B., & Deane, C. M. (2017) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25291 · Cited by 99 · cited 19× · see citing works
“Wang and coworkers have examined molecular sequences of commercially available mAb drug products and shown that they contain multiple well defined aggregation prone motifs often located in their CDRs [206].”
BackgroundInfluentialPantazes, R. J., & Maranas, C. D. (2010) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzq061 · Cited by 97 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Since then, four methods have been made available: OptCDR [139], OptMAVEn[140], AbDesign [143] and RosettaAntibodyDesign [142].”
MethodGalson, J. D., Trück, J., Fowler, A., Clutterbuck, E. A., Münz, M., Cerundolo, V., Reinhard, C., van der Most, R., Pollard, A. J., Lunter, G., et al. (2015) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.11.034 · Cited by 97 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Clustering by V, J genes and CDRH3 sequence to identify large sequence-similar groups can identify antigen-specific cells after vaccinating humans with Hepatitis B [215].”
BackgroundIn vitro and in silico assessment of the developability of a designed monoclonal antibody library
Wolf Pérez, A.-M., Sormanni, P., Andersen, J. S., Sakhnini, L. I., Rodriguez-Leon, I., Bjelke, J. R., Gajhede, A. J., De Maria, L., Otzen, D. E., Vendruscolo, M., et al. (2019) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2018.1556082 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Modeling Antibody-Antigen Complexes by Information-Driven Docking
Ambrosetti, F., Jiménez‐García, B., Roel‐Touris, J., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2019) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2019.10.011 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationKunik, V., & Ofran, Y. (2013) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzt027 · Cited by 96 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Many epitope prediction methods do not include information on the antibody, thus focusing on identifying generic immunogenic molecular surfaces [167].”
BackgroundIMSEQ—a fast and error aware approach to immunogenetic sequence analysis
Kuchenbecker, L., Nienen, M., Hecht, J., Neumann, A. U., Babel, N., Reinert, K., & Robinson, P. N. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv309 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Synthetic antibodies designed on natural sequence landscapes
Zhai, W., Glanville, J., Fuhrmann, M., Mei, L., Ni, I., Sundar, P. D., Van Blarcom, T., Abdiche, Y., Lindquist, K., Strohner, R., et al. (2011) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2011.07.018 · Cited by 93 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This has already been demonstrated to some extent through analysis of antibodies derived from 600 donors [24] followed by construction of a library based on natural positional preferences [26].”
BackgroundMonoclonal antibody humanness score and its applications
Gao, S. H., Huang, K., Tu, H., & Adler, A. S. (2013) · BMC Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/1472-6750-13-55 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Analysis and modeling of the variable region of camelid single-domain antibodies
Sircar, A., Sanni, K. A., Shi, J., & Gray, J. J. (2011) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1100116 · Cited by 92 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Furthermore, the nanobody CDRH3 loop is on average three to four residues longer than its antibody counterpart, and significantly more diverse in terms of both primary sequence and tertiary structure configuration, defying the canonical antibody VH-domain-based rules and enabling nanobody CDRH3 loops to exhibit finger…”
BackgroundAntibody and antigen contact residues define epitope and paratope size and structure
Stave, J. W., & Lindpaintner, K. (2013) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1203198 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Vidjil: A Web Platform for Analysis of High-Throughput Repertoire Sequencing
Duez, M., Giraud, M., Herbert, R., Rocher, T., Salson, M., & Thonier, F. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166126 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
The structural analysis of shark IgNAR antibodies reveals evolutionary principles of immunoglobulins
Feige, M. J., Gräwert, M. A., Marcinowski, M., Hennig, J., Behnke, J., Ausländer, D., Herold, E. M., Peschek, J., Castro, C. D., Flajnik, M., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1321502111 · Cited by 91 · cited 1× · see citing works
“camels) [27] and sharks [228, 229] (reviewed by Muyldermans [230] and Bannas et al.”
BackgroundIn-silico prediction of concentration-dependent viscosity curves for monoclonal antibody solutions
Tomar, D. S., Li, L., Broulidakis, M. P., Luksha, N., Burns, C. T., Singh, S. K., & Kumar, S. (2017) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2017.1285479 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationPrediction of site-specific interactions in antibody–antigen complexes: the proABC method and server
Olimpieri, P. P., Chailyan, A., Tramontano, A., & Marcatili, P. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt369 · Cited by 90 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recently, Antibody i-Patch and Paratome were outperformed by machine learning approaches such as the random forest-based proABC [112], support-vector machinebased AntibodyInterfacePrediction [114] and the deep learning-”
MethodAntibody interface prediction with 3D Zernike descriptors and SVM
Daberdaku, S., & Ferrari, C. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty918 · Cited by 88 · cited 3× · see citing works
“To the best of our knowledge AntibodyInterfacePrediction and AG-FastParapred are currently the best performing paratope prediction methods as compared to previously available methods; however, they were not compared against one another.”
MethodLYRA, a webserver for lymphocyte receptor structural modeling
Klausen, M. S., Anderson, M. V., Jespersen, M. C., Nielsen, M., & Marcatili, P. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv535 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Krawczyk, K., Baker, T., Shi, J., & Deane, C. M. (2013) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzt043 · Cited by 87 · cited 4× · see citing works
“For instance, statistical approaches such as Antibody i-Patch [110] assign a score to each residue with respect to its propensity to be part of the paratope, with high-”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationAbDb: antibody structure database-a database of PDB-derived antibody structures
Ferdous, S., & Martin, A. C. R. (2018) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/bay040 · Cited by 87 · cited 2× · see citing works
“uk/abs/abdb/ Database of antibody structures [52]”
BackgroundTsuchiya, Y., & Mizuguchi, K. (2016) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.2874 · Cited by 86 · cited 1× · see citing works
“of the six CDRs [33] and is very important for antigen recognition [34, 35].”
BackgroundKumar, S., Singh, S. K., Wang, X., Rup, B., & Gill, D. (2011) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-011-0414-9 · Cited by 85 · cited 1× · see citing works
“workers have observed an overlap between potential immune epitopes and aggregation prone regions (APRs) around the CDRs of therapeutic antibodies [195, 196].”
BackgroundSelf-citationsdAb-DB: the single domain antibody database
Wilton, E. E., Opyr, M. P., Kailasam, S., Kothe, R. F., & Wieden, H.-J. (2018) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.8b00407 · Cited by 84 · cited 1× · see citing works
“these molecules is demonstrated by recent nanobody-specific databases and analyses [57, 58, 231, 232].”
BackgroundLi, T., Pantazes, R. J., & Maranas, C. D. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105954 · Cited by 79 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Since then, four methods have been made available: OptCDR [139], OptMAVEn[140], AbDesign [143] and RosettaAntibodyDesign [142].”
MethodWang, X., Singh, S. K., & Kumar, S. (2010) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-010-0143-5 · Cited by 79 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Analyses of high resolution crystal structures of antigenantibody complexes show that the framework residues can bury a substantial amount of surface area upon complex formation [159, 160].”
BackgroundSelf-citationAntibody humanization by structure-based computational protein design
Choi, Y., Hua, C. K., Sentman, C. L., Ackerman, M. E., & Bailey‐Kellogg, C. (2015) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2015.1076600 · Cited by 77 · cited 4× · see citing works
“These methods remain sequence-based and do not explicitly use the structure of the antibody to be humanized, although HSC uses a contact-based score derived a priori.”
BackgroundInfluentialComputational design of epitope-specific functional antibodies
Nimrod, G., Fischman, S., Austin, M., Herman, A., Keyes, F., Leiderman, O., Hargreaves, D., Strajbl, M., Breed, J., Klompus, S., et al. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.081 · Cited by 77 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A further approach to data mining existing structures to improve antibody affinity is ‘re-epitoping’, pioneered by Ofran and collaborators [184].”
BackgroundAntigenDB: an immunoinformatics database of pathogen antigens
Ansari, H. R., Flower, D. R., & Raghava, G. P. S. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp830 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Fast multiclonal clusterization of V(D)J recombinations from high-throughput sequencing
Giraud, M., Salson, M., Duez, M., Villenet, C., Quief, S., Caillault, A., Grardel, N., Roumier, C., Preudhomme, C., & Figeac, M. (2014) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-409 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
PEASE: predicting B-cell epitopes utilizing antibody sequence
Sela‐Culang, I., Ashkenazi, S., Peters, B., & Ofran, Y. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu790 · Cited by 71 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We summarize the linear and conformational epitope predictors in Supplementary Information and those following the new paradigm of including antibody in providing epitope predictions (antibody-specific predictors) in Table 2C. Antibodyspecific epitope prediction was first addressed by Rapberger and co-workers in 2007…”
MethodThe interfacial character of antibody paratopes: analysis of antibody–antigen structures
Nguyen, M. N., Pradhan, M. R., Verma, C. S., & Zhong, P. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx389 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Using a combined computational-experimental approach to predict antibody-specific B cell epitopes
Sela-Culang, I., Benhnia, M. R.-E.-I., Matho, M. H., Kaever, T., Maybeno, M., Schlossman, A., Nimrod, G., Li, S., Xiang, Y., Zajonc, D., et al. (2014) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2014.02.003 · Cited by 69 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We summarize the linear and conformational epitope predictors in Supplementary Information and those following the new paradigm of including antibody in providing epitope predictions (antibody-specific predictors) in Table 2C. Antibodyspecific epitope prediction was first addressed by Rapberger and co-workers in 2007…”
MethodPons, C., Talavera, D., de la Cruz, X., Orozco, M., & Fernández‐Recio, J. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100353e · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Griffiths, K., Dolezal, O., Parisi, K., Angerosa, J., Dogovski, C., Barraclough, M., Sanalla, A., Casey, J., González, I., Perugini, M., et al. (2013) · Antibodies · doi:10.3390/antib2010066 · Cited by 64 · cited 1× · see citing works
“camels) [27] and sharks [228, 229] (reviewed by Muyldermans [230] and Bannas et al.”
BackgroundOstmeyer, J., Christley, S., Rounds, W. H., Toby, I., Greenberg, B. M., Monson, N. L., & Cowell, L. G. (2017) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1814-6 · Cited by 63 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It was demonstrated that statistical classifiers can identify immune profiles of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia [220], multiple sclerosis [221] or influenza [222] from NGS data alone.”
BackgroundOhlin, M., Scheepers, C., Corcoran, M., Lees, W., Busse, C. E., Bagnara, D., Thörnqvist, L., Bürckert, J.-P., Jackson, K., Ralph, D., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00435 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
AbRSA: A robust tool for antibody numbering
Li, L., Chen, S., Miao, Z., Liu, Y., Liu, X., Xiao, Z. J., & Cao, Y. (2019) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3633 · Cited by 62 · cited 2× · see citing works
“To the best of our knowledge, there are three freely available software packages to perform numbering of antibodies, ANARCI [83], Abnum [82] and AbRSA[81], to act as the first step in computational antibody analysis such as homology modelling.”
MethodJain, T., Boland, T., Lilov, A., Burnina, I., Brown, M., Xu, Y., & Vásquez, M. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx519 · Cited by 61 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This was addressed by Jain and colleagues who developed a surface accessible area predictor that can be applied to an antibody sequence to further create a propensity score that could be correlated with aggregation risk [149].”
Computational Methods to Predict Therapeutic Protein Aggregation
Buck, P. M., Kumar, S., Wang, X., Agrawal, N. J., Trout, B. L., & Singh, S. K. (2012) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-921-1_26 · Cited by 60 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A number of groups have reviewed the applicability of various algorithms (Figure 2D, Table 2E) available to predict APRs in biotherapeutics [204, 205].”
BackgroundSelf-citationBrown, A. J., Snapkov, I., Akbar, R., Pavlović, M., Miho, E., Sandve, G. K., & Greiff, V. (2019) · Molecular Systems Design & Engineering · doi:10.1039/c9me00071b · Cited by 59 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Detection of antigen-specific sequences or the immune state could be improved by defining sequence- and structure-based rules governing adaptive immune responses through large scale analysis of antibody repertoires [25].”
BackgroundAttentive Cross-Modal Paratope Prediction.
Deac, A., Veličković, P., & Sormanni, P. (2019) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.17863/cam.95179 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Development trends for generation of single-chain antibody fragments
Farajnia, S., Ahmadzadeh, V., Tanomand, A., Veisi, K., Khosroshahi, S. A., & Rahbarnia, L. (2014) · Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology · doi:10.3109/08923973.2014.945126 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Prediction of VH-VL domain orientation for antibody variable domain modeling
Bujotzek, A., Dunbar, J., Lipsmeier, F., Schäfer, W., Antes, I., Deane, C. M., & Georges, G. (2015) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24756 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Sphinx: merging knowledge-based and<i>ab initio</i>approaches to improve protein loop prediction
Marks, C., Nowak, J., Klostermann, S., Georges, G., Dunbar, J., Shi, J., Kelm, S., & Deane, C. M. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw823 · Cited by 56 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The biggest challenge in such ab initio modelling remains selection of best loop models among those generated [102].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationAntibody H3 structure prediction
Marks, C., & Deane, C. M. (2017) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2017.01.010 · Cited by 56 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Knowledge-based methods are currently capable of providing accurate predictions for the five canonical loops, but CDRH3 remains a challenge [156].”
MethodMining for the antibody-antigen interacting associations that predict the B cell epitopes
Zhao, L., & Li, J. (2010) · BMC Structural Biology · doi:10.1186/1472-6807-10-s1-s6 · Cited by 55 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We summarize the linear and conformational epitope predictors in Supplementary Information and those following the new paradigm of including antibody in providing epitope predictions (antibody-specific predictors) in Table 2C. Antibodyspecific epitope prediction was first addressed by Rapberger and co-workers in 2007…”
MethodImproved prediction of antibody VL–VHorientation
Marze, N. A., Lyskov, S., & Gray, J. J. (2016) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzw013 · Cited by 55 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Rosetta VH/VL orientation VH/VL orientation Rosetta Suite [108]”
BackgroundOptMAVEn-2.0: De novo Design of Variable Antibody Regions against Targeted Antigen Epitopes
Chowdhury, R., Allan, M. F., & Maranas, C. D. (2018) · Antibodies · doi:10.3390/antib7030023 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Rosenfeld, A. M., Meng, W., Prak, E. T. L., & Hershberg, U. (2018) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.02107 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Epitope specific antibodies and T cell receptors in the immune epitope database
Mahajan, S., Vita, R., Shackelford, D., Lane, J., Schulten, V., Zarebski, L., Jespersen, M. C., Marcatili, P., Nielsen, M., Sette, A., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.02688 · Cited by 53 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Data on epitopes targeted by antibodies can be readily downloaded from the IEDB that now links such information to epitope-specific antibody sequences [67].”
BackgroundReconstructing and mining the B cell repertoire with ImmunediveRsity
Cortina-Ceballos, B., Godoy-Lozano, E. E., Sámano‐Sánchez, H., Aguilar-Salgado, A., Velasco‐Herrera, M. D. C., Vargas-Chávez, C., Velázquez-Ramírez, D. D., Romero, G., Moreno, J. G., Téllez‐Sosa, J., et al. (2015) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2015.1026502 · Cited by 48 · cited 1× · see citing works
“org/ImmunediveRsity/immunediversity/ [74]”
Kotai Antibody Builder: automated high-resolution structural modeling of antibodies
Yamashita, K., Ikeda, K., Amada, K. M., Liang, S., Tsuchiya, Y., Nakamura, H., Shirai, H., & Standley, D. M. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu510 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Humanization of antibodies using a statistical inference approach
Clavero-Álvarez, A., Di Mambro, T., Perez-Gaviro, S., Magnani, M., & Bruscolini, P. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-32986-y · Cited by 47 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Humanness score and HSC are primarily sequence distancebased approaches and it has been demonstrated that more sophisticated methods that take the positional correlations between residues into account could be superior [187, 188].”
BackgroundABGEN: A Knowledge-Based Automated Approach for Antibody Structure Modeling
Mandal, C., Kingery, B. D., Anchin, J. M., Subramaniam, S., & Linthicum, D. S. (1996) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0396-323 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Hasegawa, K., Kubota, M., & Matsuura, Y. (1999) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/12.10.819 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Use of amino acid composition to predict epitope residues of individual antibodies
Soga, S., Kuroda, D., Shirai, H., Kobori, M., & Hirayama, N. (2010) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzq014 · Cited by 46 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We summarize the linear and conformational epitope predictors in Supplementary Information and those following the new paradigm of including antibody in providing epitope predictions (antibody-specific predictors) in Table 2C. Antibodyspecific epitope prediction was first addressed by Rapberger and co-workers in 2007…”
MethodThe Pipeline Repertoire for Ig-Seq Analysis
López-Santibáñez-Jácome, L., Avendaño-Vázquez, S. E., & Flores-Jasso, C. F. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00899 · Cited by 46 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This can be achieved by programs such as IgBLAST [68] or IMGT VQuest [69] and multiple other tools aimed at processing raw antibody data (Table 2A, reviewed in [150]).”
MethodSevy, A. M., Healey, J. F., Deng, W., Spiegel, P. C., Meeks, S. L., & Li, R. (2013) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/jth.12433 · Cited by 45 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Additionally, inputs from experimental studies such as hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX) coupled with mass spectrometry and mutational analyses can help refine the computational models of antibody–antigen complexes [175, 176].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 242 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Kindt, 2007, Kuby Immunology
- Inc. CCG, 2016, Molecular Operating Environment (MOE), 2016.08
- MacKerel, 1998, CHARMM: the energy function and its parameterization with an overview of the program, Encycl Comput Chem, 1, 271
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Olsen, T. H., Boyles, F., & Deane, C. M. (2022) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4205 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
“2,11 Moreover, the limited sequencing length of currently available high-throughput sequencing platforms means the full antibody cannot be reliably sequenced.”
BackgroundImmunogenicity and humanization of single‐domain antibodies
Rossotti, M. A., Bélanger, K., Henry, K. A., & Tanha, J. (2021) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.15809 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Akbar, R., Robert, P. A., Pavlović, M., Jeliazkov, J. R., Snapkov, I., Slabodkin, A., Weber, C. R., Scheffer, L., Miho, E., Haff, I. H., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108856 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Narayanan, H., Dingfelder, F., Butté, A., Lorenzen, N., Sokolov, M., & Arosio, P. (2021) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2020.12.004 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Deep geometric representations for modeling effects of mutations on protein-protein binding affinity
Liu, X., Luo, Y., Li, P., Song, S., & Peng, J. (2021) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009284 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
“Despite the broad application potentials of Ab therapy, it is very challenging to design Abs that have a desired binding affinity with antigens [3].”
Development and use of machine learning algorithms in vaccine target selection
Bravi, B. (2024) · npj Vaccines · doi:10.1038/s41541-023-00795-8 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
“23,24 ).”
Akbar, R., Bashour, H., Rawat, P., Robert, P. A., Smorodina, E., Cotet, T., Karlsen, K. F., Frank, R., Mehta, B. B., Vu, M. H., et al. (2022) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2021.2008790 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Advances in computational structure-based antibody design
Hummer, A. M., Abanades, B., & Deane, C. M. (2022) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102379 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
DLAB-deep learning methods for structure-based virtual screening of antibodies
Schneider, C., Buchanan, A., Taddese, B., & Deane, C. M. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab660 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Assessing developability early in the discovery process for novel biologics
Fernández‐Quintero, M. L., Ljungars, A., Waibl, F., Greiff, V., Andersen, J. T., Gjølberg, T. T., Jenkins, T. P., Voldborg, B. G. R., Grav, L. M., Kumar, S., et al. (2023) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2023.2171248 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationSmiatek, J., Jung, A., & Bluhmki, E. (2020) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.05.008 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Khuat, T. T., Bassett, R., Otte, E. A., Grevis-James, A., & Gabryś, B. (2024) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108585 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
In silico proof of principle of machine learning-based antibody design at unconstrained scale
Akbar, R., Robert, P. A., Weber, C. R., Widrich, M., Frank, R., Pavlović, M., Scheffer, L., Chernigovskaya, M., Snapkov, I., Slabodkin, A., et al. (2022) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2022.2031482 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Khetan, R., Curtis, R., Deane, C. M., Hadsund, J. T., Kar, U., Krawczyk, K., Kuroda, D., Robinson, S. A., Sormanni, P., Tsumoto, K., et al. (2022) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2021.2020082 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
“13 However, like other protein–protein interfaces, antibody–antigen interactions involve a combination of non-polar van der Waals interactions, hydrogen bonding, charge interactions, and the hydrophobic effect.”
Self-citationWilman, W., Wróbel, S., Bielska, W., Deszyński, P., Dudzic, P., Jaszczyszyn, I., Kaniewski, J., Młokosiewicz, J., Rouyan, A., Satława, T., et al. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac267 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
“Making this paradigm shift in how biological drug discovery and development projects are prosecuted will help realize the vision of Biopharmaceutical Informatics which calls for syncretic use of modern computational and experimental technologies to make biological drug discovery more efficient [7, 99, 145, 146].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationGuarra, F., & Colombo, G. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00513 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
INDI—integrated nanobody database for immunoinformatics
Deszyński, P., Młokosiewicz, J., Volanakis, A., Jaszczyszyn, I., Castellana, N. E., Bonissone, S. R., Ganesan, R., & Krawczyk, K. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1021 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
“By contrast, though nanobodies were discovered close to 30 years ago (11), they attracted less attention in collating data and developing computational protocols addressing these molecules (10).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationAddressing the antibody germline bias and its effect on language models for improved antibody design
Olsen, T. H., Moal, I. H., & Deane, C. M. (2024) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btae618 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Robert, P. A., Akbar, R., Frank, R., Pavlović, M., Widrich, M., Snapkov, I., Slabodkin, A., Chernigovskaya, M., Scheffer, L., Smorodina, E., et al. (2022) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-022-00372-4 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Amimeur, T., Shaver, J. M., Ketchem, R. R., Taylor, J. A., Clark, R. H., Smith, J., Citters, D. V., Siska, C. C., Smidt, P., Sprague, M., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.04.12.024844 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
A new era of antibody discovery: an in-depth review of AI-driven approaches
Cheng, J., Liang, T., Xie, X., Feng, Z., & Meng, L. (2024) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2024.103984 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Sequence-based prediction of pH-dependent protein solubility using CamSol
Oeller, M., Kang, R. J. D., Bell, R., Ausserwӧger, H., Sormanni, P., & Vendruscolo, M. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbad004 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Li, T., Li, Y., Zhu, X., He, Y., Wu, Y., Ying, T., & Xie, Z. (2023) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2023.02.007 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Engineering Stability, Viscosity, and Immunogenicity of Antibodies by Computational Design
Kuroda, D., & Tsumoto, K. (2020) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2020.01.011 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Dewaker, V., Morya, V. K., Kim, Y. H., Park, S. T., Kim, H. S., & Koh, Y. H. (2025) · Biomarker Research · doi:10.1186/s40364-025-00764-4 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Antibody design using deep learning: from sequence and structure design to affinity maturation
Joubbi, S., Micheli, A., Milazzo, P., Maccari, G., Ciano, G., Cardamone, D., & Medini, D. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae307 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“An overview of these methods can be found here [19].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialproABC-2: PRediction of AntiBody contacts v2 and its application to information-driven docking
Ambrosetti, F., Olsen, T. H., Olimpieri, P. P., Jiménez‐García, B., Milanetti, E., Marcatili, P., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa644 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“…experimental approaches used to characterize antibodies (e.g. NMR, x-ray, mass spectrometry) are often expensive and time consuming, computational tools offer valuable and complementary approaches which can provide information at different levels (sequence and/or structural) (Norman et al., 2019).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDeep mutational scanning for therapeutic antibody engineering
Hanning, K. R., Minot, M., Warrender, A. K., Kelton, W., & Reddy, S. T. (2021) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2021.11.010 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
The RESP AI model accelerates the identification of tight-binding antibodies
Parkinson, J., Hard, R. L., & Wang, W. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36028-8 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Accelerating therapeutic protein design with computational approaches toward the clinical stage
Chen, Z., Wang, X., Chen, X., Huang, J., Wang, C., Wang, J., & Wang, Z. (2023) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2023.04.027 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“…and modeling abilities that enable them to comprehend the complex rules governing protein properties, provide a multi-scale view for pharmaceutical scientists [27–30], accelerate the development of protein-based therapeutics, and reduce costs compared to traditional experimental methods [28,30].”
BackgroundToward real-world automated antibody design with combinatorial Bayesian optimization
Khan, A. A., Cowen-Rivers, A. I., Grosnit, A., Deik, D.-G.-X., Robert, P. A., Greiff, V., Smorodina, E., Rawat, P., Akbar, R., Dreczkowski, K., et al. (2023) · Cell Reports Methods · doi:10.1016/j.crmeth.2022.100374 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Perspectives on High-Throughput Ligand/Protein Docking With Martini MD Simulations
Souza, P. C. T., Limongelli, V., Wu, S., Marrink, S., & Monticelli, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2021.657222 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Prospects for the computational humanization of antibodies and nanobodies
Gordon, G. L., Raybould, M. I. J., Wong, A., & Deane, C. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1399438 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Lai, P.-K., Fernando, A., Cloutier, T. K., Kingsbury, J. S., Gokarn, Y., Halloran, K. T., Calero-Rubio, C., & Trout, B. L. (2021) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2020.12.014 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
The evolutionary and functional significance of germline immunoglobulin gene variation
Pennell, M., Rodriguez, O. L., Watson, C. T., & Greiff, V. (2022) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2022.11.001 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Assessment of Therapeutic Antibody Developability by Combinations of In Vitro and In Silico Methods
Pérez, A.-M. W., Lorenzen, N., Vendruscolo, M., & Sormanni, P. (2021) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1450-1_4 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Mause, E. R. V., Atanackovic, D., Lim, C. S., & Luetkens, T. (2022) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.12.009 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Prediction of protein assemblies by structure sampling followed by interface‐focused scoring
Olechnovič, K., Valančauskas, L., Dapkūnas, J., & Venclovas, Č. (2023) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26569 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“The main issue in antibody structure prediction is the modeling of the CDRs, especially the CDR-H3 loop, 41,42 and the conformations of these loops may even change upon binding.”
BackgroundModeling and affinity maturation of an anti-CD20 nanobody: a comprehensive in-silico investigation
Poustforoosh, A., Faramarz, S., Negahdaripour, M., & Hashemipour, H. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-27926-4 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Das, N. C., Chakraborty, P., Bayry, J., & Mukherjee, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.782506 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“In addition, the webtool EpiPred was explored to determine the epitopes by using the homology model of the antibody as an input (32, 33).”
MethodLiu, J., Wu, L., Xie, A., Liu, W. L., Zhao, H., Wan, Y., & Mao, W. (2025) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-025-03169-5 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“However, we must acknowledge the tremendous value brought by AI technologies, which guide rational Nbs design and optimization while maximizing time and cost savings [266].”
Cloutier, T. K., Sudrik, C., Mody, N., Sathish, H. A., & Trout, B. L. (2020) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00629 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Son, A., Park, J., Kim, W., Yoon, Y., Lee, S., Park, Y., & Kim, H. (2024) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules29194626 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Applications of Machine and Deep Learning in Adaptive Immunity
Pertseva, M., Gao, B., Neumeier, D., Yermanos, A., & Reddy, S. T. (2021) · Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-101420-125021 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Polonsky, K., Pupko, T., & Freund, N. T. (2023) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.2300150 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Immunoglobulins with Non-Canonical Functions in Inflammatory and Autoimmune Disease States
Ermakov, E. A., Nevinsky, G. A., & Buneva, V. N. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21155392 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“Each of the approximately estimated 5 × 109 B cells produces a specific B cell receptor or Ab through somatic recombination of variable (V), diversity (D), joining (J) and constant (C) gene segments (V–(D)–J recombination) [8,9].”
BackgroundInfluentialGarofalo, M., Grazioso, G., Cavalli, A., & Sgrignani, J. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25071756 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Nanobody engineering: computational modelling and design for biomedical and therapeutic applications
Salamouni, N. S. E., Cater, J. H., Spenkelink, L. M., & Yu, H. B. (2024) · FEBS Open Bio · doi:10.1002/2211-5463.13850 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“Most of the available databases primarily contain data for antibodies, with some also including information on nanobodies [62,67].”
In silico prediction of post-translational modifications in therapeutic antibodies
Vatsa, S. (2022) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2021.2023938 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“Structure-based approaches predict PTM liabilities by using structural features correlated with enzymatic and chemical modifications.(18) Common structural features include, but are not limited to, secondary structure, water coordination number (WCN), and solvent-accessible surface area (SASA).”
BackgroundInformation-Driven Antibody–Antigen Modelling with HADDOCK
Ambrosetti, F., Jandová, Z., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2022) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-2609-2_14 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationDahlgren, D., & Lennernäs, H. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25122861 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Methods for sequence and structural analysis of B and T cell receptor repertoires
Teraguchi, S., Saputri, D. S., Llamas-Covarrubias, M. A., Davila, A., Díez, D., Nazlica, S. A., Rozewicki, J., Ismanto, H. S., Wilamowski, J., Xie, J., et al. (2020) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.07.008 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“More-over, the regions of greatest uncertainty tend to be the CDRs (especially CDRH3), which is highly likely to form part of the paratope [110].”
Single-domain antibodies as therapeutics for solid tumor treatment
Wang, M., Ying, T., & Wu, Y. (2024) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2024.03.016 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“Therefore, we used a highly soluble and stable HIV-1-neutralizing VH, named m36, as a reference, to search for human immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV) alleles with the same FRs from the IMGT database.”
BackgroundBashour, H., Smorodina, E., Pariset, M., Zhong, J., Akbar, R., Chernigovskaya, M., Lê Quý, K., Snapkow, I., Rawat, P., Krawczyk, K., et al. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-06561-3 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“These fi ndings emphasize the signi fi cance of structural consideration for therapeutic antibody design 3,8,25,97,98 .”
Self-citationJin, R., Ye, Q., Wang, J., Cao, Z., Jiang, D., Wang, T., Kang, Y., Xu, W., Hsieh, C., & Hou, T. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae304 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“These repositories are renowned for their comprehensive collections of antigen–antibody complexes and have served as valuable resources in numerous computational studies [68, 69].”
BackgroundYang, Y. X., Wang, P., & Zhu, B. T. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2022.108364 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
nanoBERT: a deep learning model for gene agnostic navigation of the nanobody mutational space
Hadsund, J. T., Satława, T., Janusz, B., Shan, L., Zhou, L. Y., Röttger, R., & Krawczyk, K. (2024) · Bioinformatics Advances · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbae033 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“For this reason, nanobodies can benefit from the breadth of computational approaches developed for antibodies but require fine-tuning towards this specific molecule type (Norman et al. 2020, Wilman et al .”
BackgroundSelf-citationRipoll, D. R., Chaudhury, S., & Wallqvist, A. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008864 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods are potentially well suited to address these types of problems [8].”
BackgroundLi, L., Wu, S., Si, Y., Li, H., Yin, X., & Peng, D. (2022) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.13018 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Xu, X., Xu, T., Zhou, J., Liao, X., Zhang, R., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., & Gao, X. (2023) · Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2023.03.004 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“For targets with no such data-sets, antibody–antigen docking platforms provide alternative solutions [31,32].”
BackgroundLarge-scale application of free energy perturbation calculations for antibody design
Zhu, F., Bourguet, F. A., Bennett, W. F., Lau, E. Y., Arrildt, K. T., Segelke, B. W., Zemla, A. T., Desautels, T., & Faissol, D. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-14443-z · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Methods for addressing host cell protein impurities in biopharmaceutical product development
Tuameh, A., Harding, S. E., & Darton, N. J. (2022) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.202200115 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“Computational models have been used to predict the structure of the antibody[65] and antigen-binding sites.”
MethodArtificial intelligence-driven computational methods for antibody design and optimization
Vecchietti, L. F., Wijaya, B. N., Armanuly, A., Hangeldiyev, B., Jung, H., Lee, S., Cha, M., & Kim, H. M. (2025) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2025.2528902 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“154 Moving forward, we envision a community-driven platform for biologists to report confirmed negative examples from their experiments, along with relevant remarks, e.g., low expression/stability measures, non-binding examples, dissimilar docking positions between design and results, which can be…”
The therapeutic antibody profiler for computational developability assessment
Raybould, M. I. J., & Deane, C. M. (2022) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1450-1_5 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Progress toward improved understanding of antibody maturation
Vajda, S., Porter, K. A., & Kozakov, D. (2021) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2020.11.008 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“Although the methods of in silico antibody maturation and methods of de novo antibody design partially overlap, here we focus only on the first application, and refer to recent reviews [11,36] for the design tools.”
MethodData mining patented antibody sequences
Krawczyk, K., Buchanan, A. G., & Marcatili, P. (2021) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2021.1892366 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationFurtmann, N., Schneider, M., Spindler, N., Steinmann, B., Li, Z., Focken, I., Meyer, J., Dimova, D., Kroll, K., Leuschner, W. D., et al. (2021) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2021.1955433 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
How can we discover developable antibody-based biotherapeutics?
Bauer, J., Rajagopal, N., Gupta, P., Gupta, P. K., Nixon, A. E., & Kumar, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2023.1221626 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“Tools such as TopModel efficiently examine the structure for cis-amide bonds, D-amino acids, and steric clashes, allowing for rapid evaluation of model quality and accuracy prior to conducting further analysis (Norman et al., 2019;Wilman et al., 2022; Fernández-Quintero et al., 2023).”
MethodSelf-citationAI-driven antibody design with generative diffusion models: current insights and future directions
He, X., Li, J.-R., Xu, J., Shan, H., Shen, S.-Y., Gao, S.-H., & Xu, H. E. (2024) · Acta Pharmacologica Sinica · doi:10.1038/s41401-024-01380-y · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Tracking the pipeline: immunoinformatics and the COVID-19 vaccine design
Rezaei, S., Sefidbakht, Y., & Uskoković, V. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab241 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Deep learning in preclinical antibody drug discovery and development
Zhou, Y., Huang, Z., Li, W., Wei, J., Jiang, Q., Yang, W., & Huang, J. H. (2023) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2023.07.003 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
An integrative approach to protein sequence design through multiobjective optimization
Hong, L., & Kortemme, T. (2024) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011953 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Jeong, B.-S., Cha, J. S., Hwang, I., Kim, U., Adolf‐Bryfogle, J., Coventry, B., Cho, H., Kim, K., & Oh, B. (2022) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2021.2021601 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“This indicates that obtaining “plausible” antibody-antigen docking models remains a significant challenge.(40)”
BackgroundLearned features of antibody-antigen binding affinity
Miller, N. L., Clark, T., Raman, R., & Sasisekharan, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2023.1112738 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“Among the various non-self-protein-protein interactions, understanding and modeling the interactions between antibodies and antigens are of great interest from the standpoint of developing therapeutic antibodies (Norman et al., 2020).”
BackgroundShahfar, H., Du, Q., Parupudi, A., Shan, L., Esfandiary, R., & Roberts, C. J. (2022) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03669 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Chen, Y., Ma, S., Zhou, M., Yao, Y., Gao, X., Fan, X., & Wu, G. (2024) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/d4an00501e · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Yoo, D. K., Lee, S. R., Jung, Y., Han, H., Lee, H. K., Han, J., Kim, S., Chae, J., Ryu, T., & Chung, J. (2020) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom10030421 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Structure and Dynamics Guiding Design of Antibody Therapeutics and Vaccines
Fernández‐Quintero, M. L., Pomarici, N. D., Fischer, A.-L. M., Hoerschinger, V. J., Kroell, K. B., Riccabona, J. R., Kamenik, A. S., Loeffler, J. R., Ferguson, J. A., Perrett, H. R., et al. (2023) · Antibodies · doi:10.3390/antib12040067 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Over the years, various methods have been developed to tackle this problem [26,38–41].”
BackgroundMethodNew Aβ(1–42) ligands from anti-amyloid antibodies: Design, synthesis, and structural interaction
Santoro, A., Grimaldi, M., Buonocore, M., Stillitano, I., Gloria, A., Santin, M., Bobba, F., Saponetti, M. S., Ciaglia, E., & D’Ursi, A. M. (2022) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114400 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
NbX: Machine Learning-Guided Re-Ranking of Nanobody–Antigen Binding Poses
Tam, C., Kumar, A., & Zhang, K. Y. J. (2021) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph14100968 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“There are several approaches which aid the prediction of the Ab binding pose [1].”
BackgroundHacisuleyman, A., & Erman, B. (2020) · Journal of Biological Physics · doi:10.1007/s10867-020-09548-3 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Computational screening methods contributed greatly to the optimization and design of antibodies, for which several approaches are available [4, 7].”
MethodAneeshkumar, K. S., Tian, J., & Shen, J. (2021) · Journal of Alloys and Compounds · doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161270 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Yang, X., Duan, H., Liu, X., Zhang, X., Pan, S., Zhang, F., Gao, P., Лю, Б., Yang, J., Chi, X., et al. (2023) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00610-23 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“docking (45), molecular dynamic simulation, deep learning (46), and neural networks”
BackgroundComputational-Driven Epitope Verification and Affinity Maturation of TLR4-Targeting Antibodies
Ahmad, S. B., Batool, M., Kim, M.-S., & Choi, S. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22115989 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Given that experimental methods are time and resource consuming, and success is not guaranteed, computational techniques represent a rapid alternative for validation and characterization of an epitope and affinity maturation of mAbs [17].”
BackgroundMethodLearning the Language of Antibody HypervariabilityPreprint
Singh, R., Im, C., Qiu, Y., Mackness, B. C., Gupta, A., Sorenson, T., Sledzieski, S., Erlach, L., Wendt, M., Fomekong‐Nanfack, Y., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.04.26.538476 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Lauro, A. D., Rienzo, L. D., Miotto, M., Olimpieri, P. P., Milanetti, E., & Ruocco, G. (2022) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.874296 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“All these kinds of computational tools can be used for antibody design, that is, the development of a novel molecule able to bind a given antigen (Norman et al., 2020).”
BackgroundKalogeropoulos, K., Bohn, M., Jenkins, D. E., Ledergerber, J., Sørensen, C. V., Hofmann, N., Wade, J., Fryer, T., Nguyen, G. T. T., Keller, U. A. D., et al. (2023) · Toxicon · doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2023.107559 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Gallo, E. (2024) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12033-024-01064-2 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“[60].”
Li, J., Liao, L., Zhang, C., Huang, K., Zhang, P., Zhang, J. Z. H., Wan, X., & Zhang, H. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae488 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Antibody design plays a crucial role in enhancing therapeutic and diagnostic outcomes by improving antibody affinity and specificity [1].”
BackgroundAkbar, R., Robert, P. A., Pavlović, M., Jeliazkov, J. R., Snapkov, I., Slabodkin, A., Weber, C. R., Scheffer, L., Miho, E., Haff, I. H., et al. (2021) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000475562 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Exploring antibody repurposing for COVID-19: beyond presumed roles of therapeutic antibodies
Rawat, P., Sharma, D., Srivastava, A., Vani, J., & Gromiha, M. M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-89621-6 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
AbFlex: designing antibody complementarity determining regions with flexible CDR definition
Jeon, W., & Kim, D. (2024) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btae122 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“One of the challenges in developing a deep learning model for antibody design is that there is not enough data for antibody–antigen complex structures (Norman et al. 2019) to train the model.”
BackgroundSeverins, I., Joo, C., & van Noort, J. (2022) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2022.04.024 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Akbar, R., Robert, P. A., Pavlović, M., Jeliazkov, J. R., Snapkov, I., Slabodkin, A., Weber, C. R., Scheffer, L., Miho, E., Haff, I. H., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/759498 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Dudzic, P., Chomicz, D., Kończak, J., Satława, T., Janusz, B., Wrobel, S., Gawłowski, T., Jaszczyszyn, I., Bielska, W., Demharter, S., et al. (2024) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2024.2361928 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“For context, when conceived in 2018, the Observed Antibody Space (OAS), which has been a widely used resource for BCR NGS data, 23,24 was created using manual identification of BCR-containing sequences.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationChallenges in Detection of Serum Oncoprotein: Relevance to Breast Cancer Diagnostics
Lengfeld, J. E., Zhang, H., Stoesz, S. P., Murali, R., Pass, F., Greene, M. I., Goel, P. N., & Grover, P. (2021) · Breast Cancer Targets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/bctt.s331844 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Marquez, J., Dong, J., Dong, C., Tian, C., & Serrero, G. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246197 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Advancements in the field of artificial intelligence have allowed researchers to work with even larger databases and data sets, allowing for computational technology to more accurately perform tasks such as therapeutic antibody design, epitope prediction, and complementarity-determining region (CDR) optimization, whic…”
BackgroundLeveraging monoclonal antibodies as therapeutics to address antimicrobial resistance in bacteria
Verma, V. (2022) · Journal of Applied Biology & Biotechnology · doi:10.7324/jabb.2023.90087 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Antibody discovery is also aided by computational strategies, which allow the analysis of the immunogenicity profile, biophysical properties, and developability profile of lead antibody molecules for better chances of success during clinical trials [26].”
BackgroundBenchmarking TriadAb using targets from the second antibody modeling assessment
Lee, F. S., Anderson, A. G., & Olafson, B. D. (2023) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzad013 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Frota, N., Rebouças, A., Fuzo, C. A., & Lourenzoni, M. R. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2021.107949 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Norman, R. A., Ambrosetti, F., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., Colwell, L. J., Kelm, S., Kumar, S., & Krawczyk, K.
- Affiliations
- Pistoia Alliance Inc., USA
- Utrecht University (NL)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- UCB Pharma (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Boehringer Ingelheim (United States) (US)
- NaturalAntibody, Germany
- Corresponding author
- Krawczyk, Konrad
- ORCID
- Venue
- Briefings in Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-10-18
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1549-1567
- ISSN
- 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4054
- PMC
- PMC7947987
- OpenAlex
- W2980681402
- Semantic Scholar
- aeee70fa6bd5b6d3659d9486f33655afbadbf02c
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 242
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
- Locations
- Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Union Horizon 2020 BioExcel (675728, 823830)
- EOSC-hub (777536)
- Simons Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- therapeutic antibody design, antibody engineering, monoclonal antibodies, nanobodies, antibody database, protein modeling, antibody-antigen binding, biologic therapy
- MeSH terms
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Protein Conformation, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein, Molecular Docking Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review