Cited by 15

Animal- versus in vitro-derived antibodies: avoiding the extremes

Bradbury, Andrew R.M., Dübel, Stefan, Knappik, Achim, Plückthun, Andreas·2021·mAbs

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19420862.2021.1950265

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [1]González-Fernández Á, Bermúdez Silva FJ, López-Hoyos M, Cobaleda C, Montoliu L, Del Val M, Leech K. Non-animal-derived monoclonal antibodies are not ready to substitute current hybridoma technology. Nat Methods. 2020; 17: 1069– 3. doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-00977-5. 33020658 · DOI
  2. [2]Truppo M, Yancopoulos G, Murphy AJ, Bradley A, Green L, Lorenz I. Non-animal-derived antibodies: pharma companies respond. Nature. 2020; 586(7830): 500. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02923-z. 33082540 · DOI
  3. [3]Custers R, Steyaert J. Discussions on the quality of antibodies are no reason to ban animal immunization. EMBO Rep. 2020: e51761. doi: 10.15252/embr.202051761. 33179844 PMC7726777 · DOI
  4. [11]Bradbury A, Plückthun A. Antibodies: validate recombinants once. Nature. 2015; 520: 295. doi: 10.1038/520295b. 25877194 · DOI
  5. [12]Bradbury AR, Plückthun A. Getting to reproducible antibodies: the rationale for sequenced recombinant characterized reagents. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2015; 28: 303– 05. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzv051. 26446960 · DOI
  6. [14]Gray A, Bradbury A, Knappik A, Plückthun A, Borrebaeck CAK, Dübel S. Animal-free alternatives and the antibody iceberg. Nat Biotechnol. 2020; 38: 1234– 39. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0687-9. 33046876 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [15]Polakiewicz RD. Antibodies: the solution is validation. Nature. 2015; 518(7540): 483. doi: 10.1038/518483b. 25719656 · DOI
  8. [16]Prabakaran P, Rao SP, Wendt M. Animal immunization merges with innovative technologies: a new paradigm shift in antibody discovery. MAbs. 2021; 13: 1924347. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2021.1924347. 33947305 PMC8118498 · DOI

Authors
Bradbury, A. R. M., Dübel, S., Knappik, A., & Plückthun, A.
Affiliations
  • Specifica Inc., Santa Fe, NM, USA
  • Department of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
  • Bio-Rad, Puchheim, Germany
  • Department of Biochemistry, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
Venue
mAbs
Published
2021-01-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1942-0862
  • 1942-0870
Cited by
15
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review