Epi4Ab: a data-driven prediction model of conformational epitopes for specific antibody VH/VL families and CDRs sequences
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Antibodies recognize antigens via complementary and structurally dependent mechanisms. Therefore, inclusion of antibody inputs is crucial for accurate epitope prediction. Given the limited availability of antibody-antigen complex structures, any epitope prediction model will require minimal yet sufficient antibody inputs to ensure precise epitope identification. To address this need, we introduce Epi4Ab, an antibody-specific epitope prediction model that focuses on identifying unique in-contact antigen residues for a given antibody. Epi4Ab requires minimal antibody inputs, specifically VH/VL families and complementarity-determining region sequences.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Varadi, M., Bertoni, D., Magana, P., Paramval, U., Pidruchna, I., Radhakrishnan, M., Tsenkov, M., Nair, S., Mirdita, M., Yeo, J., et al. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011 · Cited by 2,052 · see citing works
Reliable B cell epitope predictions: impacts of method development and improved benchmarking
Kringelum, J. V., Lundegaard, C., Lund, O., & Nielsen, M. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002829 · Cited by 697 · see citing works
Improving B-cell epitope prediction and its application to global antibody–antigen docking
Krawczyk, K., Liu, X., Baker, T., Shi, J., & Deane, C. M. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu190 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Tran, N. D., Subramani, K., & Su, C. T.-T.
- Affiliations
- Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Su, Chinh Tran-To
- ORCID
- Su, Chinh Tran-To
- Venue
- mAbs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2025-07-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2531227-2531227
- ISSN
- 1942-0862 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-0870
- PMC
- PMC12247109
- OpenAlex
- W4412156380
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- mAbs (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Medical Research Council (grant NMRC-OFYIRG (MOH-000661))
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
- Keywords
- antibody-antigen recognition, hypervariable region
- MeSH terms
- Epitopes, Humans, Immunoglobulin Variable Region, Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains, Immunoglobulin Light Chains, Models, Molecular, Complementarity Determining Regions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
