The Green Public Procurement in the midst of the economic crisis: is it a suitable policy tool?
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this paper is to examine the response of managers, in the case where the government incorporates certain environmental criteria into public procurement. Some research hypotheses are statistically tested in order to identify the extent of managers' understanding regarding Green Public Procurement mainly under the severe financial conditions of the current economic crisis, during which time public expenditures should gradually be cut due to the flagship policy of the European Union for severe austerity measures. The data were taken from various pieces of research carried out in Greece and Cyprus, two countries which are suffering from an economic crisis and are operating under economic supervision with severe austerity measures. The study highlights that given the current economic climate, managers consider the Green Public Procurement a very weak tool to encourage the adoption of environmental management practices due to the austerity measures and budgetary cuts. They also claimed that the classical policy tools (e.g. environmental legislation and market-based instruments) might shape an unsustainable environment for their future operations and additional measures would force them out of market.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Educational background can motivate GPP implementation.
“Educational background can motivate GPP implementation (Leal Filho et al., 2019;Nikolaou & Loizou, 2015).”
From Green public procurement as an effective way for sustainable development: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Nikolaou & Loizou, 2015
Moral/ethical motivations, and educational background is a barrier to GPP.
“Moral/ethical motivations, and educational background Leal Filho et al. (2019) Nikolaou and Loizou (2015)”
From Green public procurement as an effective way for sustainable development: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Nikolaou and Loizou (2015)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 59
- Authors
- Nikolaou, I. E., & Loizou, C.
- Corresponding author
- Nikolaou, Ioannis E.
- ORCID
- Nikolaou, Ioannis E.
- Venue
- Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-01-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-66
- ISSN
- 1943-815X (ISSN-L)
- 1943-8168
- OpenAlex
- W2077883200
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 6.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Keywords
- green public procurement, economic crisis, austerity, environmental management practices, managers' perceptions, budget cuts, Greece, Cyprus, environmental law, economic instruments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review