The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Application of convolutional neural networks featuring Bayesian optimization for landslide susceptibility assessment
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This study developed a deep learning based technique for the assessment of landslide susceptibility through a one-dimensional convolutional network (1D-CNN) and Bayesian optimisation in Southern Yangyang Province, South Korea. A total of 219 slide inventories and 17 slide conditioning variables were obtained for modelling. The data showed a complex scenario. Some past slides have spread over steep lands, while others have spread through flat terrain. Random forest (RF) served to keep only important factors for further analysis as a pre-processing measure. To select CNN hyperparameters, Bayesian optimization was used. Three methods contributed to overcoming the overfitting issue owing to small training data in our research. The selection of key factors by RF helped first of all to reduce information dimensionality. Second, the CNN model with 1D convolutions was intended to considerably decrease the number of its parameters. Third, a high rate of drop-out (0.66) helped reduce the CNN parameters. Overall accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) and 5-fold cross-validation were used to evaluate the models. CNN performance was compared to ANN and SVM. CNN achieved the highest accuracy on testing dataset (83.11%) and AUROC (0.880, 0.893, using testing and 5-fold CV, respectively). Bayesian optimization enhanced CNN accuracy by~3% (compared with default configuration). CNN could outperform ANN and SVM owing to its complicated architecture and handling of spatial correlations through convolution and pooling operations. In complex situations where some variables make a non-linear contribution to the occurrence of landslides, the method suggested could thus help develop landslide susceptibility maps.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
Deep Learning in Remote Sensing: A Comprehensive Review and List of Resources
Zhu, X. X., Tuia, D., Mou, L., Xia, G.-S., Zhang, L., Xu, F., & Fraundorfer, F. (2017) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2017.2762307 · Cited by 3,400
EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts
Bell, A., Main, I. G., Atkinson, M., Vicente, R. F., Meredith, P. G., & Boon, S. A. (2013) · Cited by 2,435
A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models
Reichenbach, P., Rossi, M., Malamud, B. D., Mihir, M., & Guzzetti, F. (2018) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001 · Cited by 2,347
Deep Learning Classification of Land Cover and Crop Types Using Remote Sensing Data
Kussul, N., Lavreniuk, M., Skakun, S., & Shelestov, A. (2017) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2017.2681128 · Cited by 1,786
Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning
Fell, R., Corominas, J., Bonnard, C., Cascini, L., Leroi, E., & Savage, W. Z. (2008) · Engineering Geology · doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.022 · Cited by 1,502
Cited by
Deep learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping
Azarafza, M., Azarafza, M., Akgün, H., Atkinson, P. M., & Derakhshani, R. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-03585-1 · Cited by 412
Evaluation of deep learning algorithms for national scale landslide susceptibility mapping of Iran
Thi Ngo, P. T., Panahi, M., Khosravi, K., Ghorbanzadeh, O., Kariminejad, N., Cerda, A., & Lee, S. (2021) · Geoscience Frontiers · doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2020.06.013 · Cited by 406
Self-citationFang, Z., Wang, Y., Peng, L., & Hong, H. (2020) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104470 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Sameen, M. I., Pradhan, B., & Lee, S.
- Venue
- CATENA
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 186
- Pages
- 104249
- ISSN
- 0341-8162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2980376317
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 51.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Application of convolutional neural networks featuring Bayesian optimization for landslide susceptibility assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104249
- The paper
- Sameen, M. I., Pradhan, B., & Lee, S. (2020). Application of convolutional neural networks featuring Bayesian optimization for landslide susceptibility assessment. CATENA. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104249
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.