Cited by 39Recycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceMaterials Engineering and ProcessingInnovative concrete reinforcement materials

Wood waste as coarse aggregate in the production of concrete

Thandavamoorthy, T.S.·2016·European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering

Abstract

An attempt was made in this experimental investigation to recycle wood waste. Concrete-containing wood aggregate in percentages of 0, 15, 20 and 25 in place of crushed stone was developed with a characteristic compressive strength of 25 MPa, with a mix proportion of 1:1.26:2.76 and with water/cement ratio of .45. One hundred and twenty specimens were cast and tested to evaluate the strength and durability properties of concrete. The performance of wood aggregate concrete was compared with control concrete that contained only crushed stone aggregate. The compressive strength of control concrete was 31.40 MPa and that of wood aggregate concrete with 15% replacement level was 32.36 MPa which is 3.06% above the control concrete. Split tensile strength of 15% replaced wood aggregate concrete was 2.25 MPa as against a value of 2.05 MPa for control concrete registering an increase of 9.75%. The flexural strength of control concrete was 2.49 MPa and that of concrete containing 15% wood aggregate was 2.51 MPa which was .80% higher than the control concrete. The weight loss of wood aggregate concrete with 15% replacement level under acid attack was 30.38% greater than the control concrete. Under alkaline attack, the weight loss of wood aggregate concrete with 15% replacement level registered an increase of 9.72% over control concrete. Therefore, wood aggregate can be used in the production of concrete, and the optimum replacement was found to be 15% from all considerations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19648189.2015.1016631

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thandavamoorthy, T. S.
Corresponding author
Thandavamoorthy, T.S.
Venue
European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering
Published
2015-03-03
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
125-141
ISSN
  • 1964-8189 (ISSN-L)
  • 2116-7214
OpenAlex
W2016647848
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Environmental and Civil engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Materials Engineering and Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
Keywords
wood waste, coarse aggregate replacement, recycled aggregate, compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, flexural strength, acid attack, alkaline attack, durability, waste recycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review