Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vocal mistuning reveals the origin of musical scales

Pfordresher, Peter Q., Brown, Steven·2017·Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

Theories of the origin of tonality from the time of Pythagoras onward have assumed that the intervals used in musical scales are defined mathematically based on harmonic ratios. Virtually all such theories are predicated on tunable instruments (e.g. strings), whereas the voice is the most ancestral and universal instrument used to make music. In the present study, we analysed the tuning of sung musical intervals from a familiar song, doing so across both trained and untrained singers. Contrary to the predictions of traditional theories, we found that sung intervals (unlike those of instruments) showed marked overlap with neighbouring interval categories. Furthermore, we found that listeners of these sung productions did not base their aesthetic judgments of singing quality on the precision of tuning of sung intervals. We consolidate these results into a model of tonality based on both vocal and sensory factors that contribute to the formation of sung melodies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20445911.2015.1132024

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.038 · DOI
  2. Arom S., 2007, Proceedings of the 4th sound and music computing conference, 107
  3. 10.2307/3679467 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04774.x · DOI
  5. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00714 · DOI
  6. Bregman A. S., 1990, Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound, 10.7551/mitpress/1486.001.0001 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/B978-012213564-4/50008-1 · DOI
  8. 10.1121/1.381737 · DOI
  9. 10.1017/CBO9781139166973 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1121/1.2427111 · DOI
  11. Daniélou A., 1999, Introduction to the study of musical scales
  12. Devaney J., 2008, Journal of Interdisciplinary Music Studies, 2, 141
  13. 10.1037/h0094008 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0033-295X.85.4.341 · DOI
  15. 10.1037/h0094275 · DOI
  16. Dowling W. J., 1986, Music cognition
  17. 10.2478/v10053-008-0052-x · DOI
  18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008144 · DOI
  19. Hagerman B., 1980, Journal of Research in Singing, 4, 3
  20. Handel S., 1989, Listening: An introduction to the psychology of auditory events
  21. Hanson H., 1960, Harmonic materials of modern music: Resources of the tempered scale
  22. von Helmholtz H., 1877, On the sensations of tone as a physiological basis for the theory of music
  23. 10.1121/1.411872 · DOI
  24. Huron D., 2006, Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation, 10.7551/mitpress/6575.001.0001 · DOI
  25. Huron D., 2008, Empirical Musicology Review, 3, 59, 10.18061/1811/31940 · DOI
  26. 10.1525/mp.2012.30.2.147 · DOI
  27. 10.1525/mp.2005.23.1.1 · DOI
  28. 10.1121/1.1912239 · DOI
  29. Krumhansl C., 1990, Cognitive foundations of musical pitch
  30. 10.1007/978-1-4419-6114-3_3 · DOI
  31. 10.1017/S0952675700000294 · DOI
  32. Ladd D. R., 1996, Intonational phonology
  33. 10.1007/978-3-642-16262-6_9 · DOI
  34. 10.3109/14015439.2012.696139 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.10.019 · DOI
  36. Lomax A., 1968, Folk song style and culture
  37. Loy G., 2006, Musimathics: The mathematical foundations of music
  38. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.008 · DOI
  39. Moog H., 1976, The musical experience of the pre-school child
  40. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195138108.003.0012 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/B978-0-12-381460-9.00001-8 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/978-3-642-74831-8 · DOI
  43. 10.1177/1029864914542842 · DOI
  44. Patel A. D., 2008, Music, language, and the brain
  45. 10.1525/mp.2007.25.2.95 · DOI
  46. 10.1121/1.3478782 · DOI
  47. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00271 · DOI
  48. 10.1121/1.1909741 · DOI
  49. 10.3758/BF03193445 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90003-5 · DOI
  51. Stevens C., 2009, Oxford handbook of music psychology, 14
  52. 10.1016/B978-0-12-381460-9.00003-1 · DOI
  53. 10.1525/mp.2012.30.3.237 · DOI
  54. 10.2307/40285261 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/B978-0-12-381460-9.00004-3 · DOI
  56. Turner R. E., 2003, Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan, 33, 585
  57. 10.1525/mp.2006.23.4.331 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198530329.003.0016 · DOI
  59. 10.1177/030573567971006 · DOI
  60. 10.1177/030573567972002 · DOI
  61. 10.1177/102986490801200102 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
Pfordresher, P. Q., & Brown, S.
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Published
2016-01-07
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
35-52
ISSN
  • 2044-5911
  • 2044-592X
Cited by
18
References
1
Language
en
Funders
National Science Foundation (BCS-1256964)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review