The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Jurgens Site: Introduction and Acknowledgements
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Anatomical location and orientation: the anatomical location and orientation of cultural bone modifications must be consistent with the marks produced by specific butchery tasks described in the literature [48, 60–62]; marks produced by natural processes, however, will not reflect any predetermined intention [43].”
From Earliest Human Presence in North America Dated to the Last Glacial Maximum: New Radiocarbon Dates from Bluefish Caves, Canada (2017) · cites this paper as [60]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Dodge, Richard I. 1959Our Wild Indians: Thirty-three Years' Personal Experience among the Red Men of the Great West. New York: Archer House (re-print of 1882 edition).
- Frison, George C. 1974 Archeology of the Casper Site.InFrison, George C., editor,The Casper Site: A Hell Gap Bison Kill on the High Plains. New York: Academic Press.
- Grinnell, George B. 1962The Cheyenne Indians. New York: Cooper Square (reprint of the 1923 edition).
- Kroeber, A. L. 1902 The Arapaho.American Museum of Natural History, Bulletin18. New York. · DOI
- Semenov, S. A. 1964Prehistoric Technology. Translated by M. W. Thompson Bath, Great Britain: Redwood Press.
- Wheat, Joe Ben 1972 The Olsen-Chubbuck Site: A Paleo-indian Bison Kill.Society for American Archaeology, Memoir26. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bourgeon, L., Burke, A., & Higham, T. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169486 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Wheat, J. B.
- Venue
- Plains Anthropologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1979-05
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 84
- Pages
- 1-149
- ISSN
- 0032-0447
- 2052-546X
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
