The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Facebook: Learning Tool or Distraction?
Abstract
The article will explore how a selected sample of secondary school students in Ontario have been using Facebook since it has become accessible to them and whether or not this use “supports the learning agenda” of classrooms as school boards have envisioned. The researchers collected both quantitative and qualitative data from 63 Ontario high school students via a questionnaire distributed through Facebook. Stating many examples of use for educational purposes, 73% of respondents reported having used Facebook for educational purposes. Of the students surveyed, only 27% said that at least one teacher had found ways to include Facebook in their lessons, and further, 77% of students believed that teachers do not support Facebook being unblocked. The results of this research point to a need for the better utilization of Facebook in classrooms and the need for school boards who choose to “embrace” the increasing popularity of social media to implement programs that better ensure teachers also feel comfortable enough to embrace this informal teaching tool.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
WhatsApp Goes to School: Mobile Instant Messaging between Teachers and Students
Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2014) · Journal of Information Technology Education: Research · doi:10.28945/2051 · Cited by 659
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2013) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12007 · Cited by 413
Skues, J. L., Williams, B., & Wise, L. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.012 · Cited by 292
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Othman, M. S., & Yusuf, L. M. (2015) · Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology · doi:10.19026/rjaset.9.2608 · Cited by 55
D'Souza, K., Henningham, L., Zou, R., Huang, J., O'Sullivan, E., Last, J., & Ho, K. (2017) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/mededu.6429 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Fewkes, A. M., & McCabe, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 92-98
- ISSN
- 2153-2974 (ISSN-L)
- 2332-7383
- OpenAlex
- W2005478706
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Facebook: Learning Tool or Distraction? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/21532974.2012.10784686
- The paper
- Fewkes, A. M., & McCabe, M. (2012). Facebook: Learning Tool or Distraction? Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2012.10784686
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.