Cited by 14Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducation and Technology Integration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning Trajectory for Transforming Teachers’ Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics and Science With Digital Image and Video Technologies in an Online Learning Experience

Niess, Margaret L., Gillow-Wiles, Henry·2014·Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education

Abstract

This qualitative cross-case study explores the influence of a designed learning trajectory on transforming teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for teaching with digital image and video technologies. The TPACK Learning Trajectory embeds tasks with specific instructional strategies within a social metacognitive constructivist structure to engage K–12 in-service teachers in an online learning course for teaching and learning mathematics and science with these technologies. The resulting trajectory shapes teachers’ TPACK into a more robust, integrated knowledge structure, influencing their thinking and decision making about the content, technology, and pedagogical concerns with these technologies. From their learning experiences, the teachers’ instructional intentions transformed to incorporate the tools and processes for teaching with technologies. The TPACK Learning Trajectory thus influences a transformation in the teachers’ TPACK strategic thinking about when, where, and how to use the technologies, with potential for influencing students’ thinking and learning of the content.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21532974.2014.946984

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Akyol Z., 2008, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12, 3
  2. 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006 · DOI
  3. Bull G. L., 2005, Teaching with digital images: Acquire, analyze, create, communicate
  4. Bull G. L., 2010, Teaching with digital video
  5. Bybee R., 2009, The BSCS 5E instructional model and 21st century skills
  6. 10.1080/10508400802224830 · DOI
  7. Chiu M. M., 2010, Journal of Education Research, 3, 321
  8. 10.3102/0013189X028002004 · DOI
  9. 10.1207/S15327809JLS10-1-2_6 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/00461520.1996.9653265 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gravemeijer K., 2006, Educational design research
  14. Greeno J. G., 1996, Handbook of educational psychology
  15. 10.1007/BF03217455 · DOI
  16. Hodes C., 2011, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11, 313
  17. Husserl E., 1970, The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenology
  18. 10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.005 · DOI
  19. 10.1023/A:1013874514650 · DOI
  20. Merriam S. B., 1998, Qualitative research and case study applications in education
  21. Meyers J. D., 2003, Computing in Science and Engineering, 5, 44, 10.1109/MCISE.2003.1196306 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006 · DOI
  24. Niess M. L., 2008, AMTE Connections, 9
  25. 10.2190/EC.44.3.c · DOI
  26. Niess M. L., 2013, Journal of Educational Computer Research, 48, 173, 10.2190/EC.48.2.d · DOI
  27. Niess M. L., 2009, Inquiry into mathematics teacher education, 143
  28. Niess M. L., 2006, Guiding inservice mathematics teachers in developing TPCK
  29. 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.012 · DOI
  30. 10.3102/0013189X029001004 · DOI
  31. Roberts B., 2002, Open Learning, 17, 10.1080/02680510120110166 · DOI
  32. Saldaña J., 2009, The coding manual for qualitative researchers
  33. Schoenfeld A. H., 2010, How we think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications., 10.4324/9780203843000 · DOI
  34. 10.3102/0013189X12442801 · DOI
  35. Thompson A. D., 2007, Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24
  36. 10.1300/J025v20n03_07 · DOI
  37. Wheatley G. H., 1992, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 529, 10.1007/BF00571471 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/s11412-006-8994-9 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Niess, M. L., & Gillow-Wiles, H.
Affiliations
Oregon State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education
Published
2014-12-19
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
5-17
ISSN
  • 2153-2974 (ISSN-L)
  • 2332-7383
OpenAlex
W1990310062
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
Keywords
TPACK, learning trajectories, mathematics education, science education, in-service teachers, online teacher training, metacognition, constructivism, educational technology integration, K-12 teachers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review