The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Who is mobilized to vote by information about voter ID laws?
Abstract
Advocacy groups often work to educate the public about voting requirements following changes to election laws. These outreach efforts have the potential to mobilize partisan groups who consider the laws a threat to their party’s electoral prospects. In the 2017 Virginia election, we partnered with an advocacy organization to conduct a field experiment evaluating the effects of the organization’s outreach campaign. We randomized which registered voters were mailed one of three informational postcards providing details about voter identification requirements in place at the time in Virginia. Overall, the postcards had minimal effects on turnout compared to the no-contact control group. However, each version of the postcards significantly increased turnout among subgroups based on their underlying partisanship and/or vote-propensity. Democrats were significantly mobilized by postcards highlighting the potentially disproportionate impact of ID laws on demographic groups that traditionally support the Democratic Party, with approximately a two percentage point increase in turnout overall, and even higher increases among high vote-propensity Democrats. A simple, informational postcard, on the other hand, elevated turnout among low vote-propensity recipients by two percentage points. The postcard treatments did not significantly increase turnout among Republicans or mid vote-propensity registrants of either party.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00354.x · DOI
- Biggers D. R., 2019, Political Behavior, 1
- 10.1017/S0007123418000157 · DOI
- 10.1177/1065912917691638 · DOI
- 10.1086/696616 · DOI
- 10.1089/elj.2013.0209 · DOI
- 10.1080/17457289.2017.1378222 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0022381613001308 · DOI
- 10.1089/elj.2008.0017 · DOI
- Gerber A., 2012, Field Experiments: Design, Analysis and Interpretation
- 10.1086/696618 · DOI
- 10.1111/ssqu.12541 · DOI
- 10.1086/696617 · DOI
- 10.1086/688343 · DOI
- 10.1177/1532673X08316608 · DOI
- 10.1177/1532440012452279 · DOI
- 10.1111/jels.12142 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003055414000604 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/poq/nfx041 · DOI
- 10.1177/1532673X11398438 · DOI
- 10.1093/poq/nfz027 · DOI
- 10.1177/1065912915577208 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1049096509090301 · DOI
- Stewart C., 2016, Stan. L. Rev, 68, 1455
- 10.1111/pops.12332 · DOI
Cited by
How to study democratic backsliding
Druckman, J. N. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12942 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Endres, K., & Panagopoulos, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Northern Iowa (US)
- Northeastern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Endres, Kyle
- Venue
- Politics, Groups, and Identities
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-06-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 143-157
- ISSN
- 2156-5503 (ISSN-L)
- 2156-5511
- OpenAlex
- W3172447039
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Politics Groups and Identities (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- MIT New Initiatives in Elections Sciences Grant
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- voter ID laws, voter turnout, voter mobilization, advocacy organizations, voter outreach, partisanship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Who is mobilized to vote by information about voter ID laws? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/21565503.2021.1932530
- The paper
- Endres, K., & Panagopoulos, C. (2023). Who is mobilized to vote by information about voter ID laws? Politics, Groups, and Identities. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2021.1932530