The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Everyday ethics in community-based participatory research
Open accessAbstract
This article explores a range of ethical issues that arise in community-based participatory research (CBPR), drawing on literature and examples from practice. The experience of CBPR practitioners adds further weight to the growing critique by many other social researchers of regulatory approaches to research ethics (which focus on rule following in accordance with research governance frameworks, codes of conduct and ethics review procedures). Yet, whilst many of the ethical challenges in CBPR are common to social research generally (informed consent, anonymity, issues of ownership of data and findings), the dynamic, complex and value-based nature of CBPR gives them particular prominence. There are also specific issues relating to the ethics of partnership working, collaboration, blurring of boundaries between researchers and researched, community rights, community conflict and democratic participation that are more frequently encountered in CBPR. Four practice examples are used to demonstrate this argument. These are taken from a young women's community allotment, a community organisation researching poverty, a youth peer research project and a museum-based digital storytelling project. The article concludes that current institutional ethical codes, guidelines and ethical review procedures are not particularly well-suited to CBPR, in that they adopt principle-based and regulatory approaches to ethics; whereas character- and relationship-based approaches to ethics are also very important in CBPR, which is adopted by many researchers with a strong value commitment to social justice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of qualitative research
Griffin, T. F. (1999) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(199907)16:4<371::aid-mar7>3.0.co;2-k · Cited by 9,037
REVIEW OF COMMUNITY-BASED RESEARCH: Assessing Partnership Approaches to Improve Public Health
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173 · Cited by 5,893
(1993) · Cited by 5,568
Groundwork of The Metaphysic of Morals
Kant, I. (2020) · Immanuel Kant: Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals in focus · doi:10.4324/9780203714805-2 · Cited by 3,280
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. M. (2006) · Cited by 2,381
Handbook of action research : participative inquiry and practice
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. M. (2001) · Cited by 2,359
Can there be a feminist ethnography?
Stacey, J. (1988) · Women's Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/0277-5395(88)90004-0 · Cited by 1,271
The Sage handbook of action research : participative inquiry and practice
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. M. (2008) · Cited by 1,218
The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global
Cocks, J. (2006) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s153759270631047x · Cited by 987
Stanley, L. (1982) · Women's Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/0277-5395(82)90076-0 · Cited by 907
Cited by
An Age-Old Problem: Examining the Discourses of Ageing in HCI and Strategies for Future Research
Vines, J., Pritchard, G., Wright, P., Olivier, P., & Brittain, K. (2015) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/2696867 · Cited by 461
Ethical Challenges in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Scoping Review
Wilson, E., Kenny, A., & Dickson-Swift, V. (2018) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732317690721 · Cited by 148
Participatory Research Approaches with Youth: Ethics, Engagement, and Meaningful Action
Teixeira, S., Augsberger, A., Richards‐Schuster, K., & Sprague Martinez, L. (2021) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/ajcp.12501 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Banks, S., Armstrong, A., Carter, K., Graham, H., Hayward, P., Henry, A., Holland, T., Holmes, C., Lee, A., McNulty, A., Moore, N., Nayling, N., Stokoe, A., & Strachan, A.
- Venue
- Contemporary Social Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 263-277
- ISSN
- 1745-0144 (ISSN-L)
- 2158-2041
- 2158-205X
- OpenAlex
- W2161997869
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 46.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Everyday ethics in community-based participatory research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/21582041.2013.769618
- The paper
- Banks, S., Armstrong, A., Carter, K., Graham, H., Hayward, P., Henry, A., Holland, T., Holmes, C., Lee, A., McNulty, A., Moore, N., Nayling, N., Stokoe, A., & Strachan, A. (2013). Everyday ethics in community-based participatory research. Contemporary Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2013.769618
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.