Cited by 148Community Health and DevelopmentEthics in Clinical ResearchQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

Ethical Challenges in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Scoping Review

Wilson, Elena, Kenny, Amanda, Dickson-Swift, Virginia·2018·Qualitative Health Research

Abstract

Ethical challenges in community-based participatory research (CBPR) are of increasing interest to researchers; however, it is not known how widespread these challenges are or how extensively the topic has been explored. Using Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review method, studies on ethical challenges in CBPR were mapped. Findings indicate that researchers continue to raise questions about ethics associated with CBPR. Our purpose in this article is to present a thematic summary of international ethical challenges as a guide for researchers interested in community participatory approaches and to better prepare them for qualitative health research with communities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1049732317690721

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many health and development organisations have frameworks to help design a theory of change.

    “Many health and development organisations (such as Social Velocity 56 ) have frameworks to help design a theory of change.”

    From Participatory action research (2023) · cites this paper as [56]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, E., Kenny, A., & Dickson-Swift, V.
Affiliations
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia
Corresponding author
Wilson, Elena
Venue
Qualitative Health Research
Published
2017-02-21
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
189-199
ISSN
  • 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7557
OpenAlex
W2589287067
Cited by
148
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Qualitative Health Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
community-based participatory research, research ethics, ethical considerations, community participation
MeSH terms
Confidentiality, Cooperative Behavior, Humans, Power, Psychological, Reproducibility of Results, Qualitative Research, Internationality, Community-Based Participatory Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review