Cited by 11Interprofessional Education and CollaborationInnovations in Medical EducationInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

Leading Change Together: Supporting Collaborative Practice through Joint Accreditation for Interprofessional Continuing Education

Open access
Regnier, Kathleen, Travlos, Dimitra V., Pace, Daniel, Powell, Sierra, Hunt, Allison·2022·Journal of European CME

Abstract

Interprofessional continuing education in support of team-based care is a critical component of healthcare quality and safety. In an effort to develop and advance the field of interprofessional continuing education (IPCE), the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) collaborated to launch Joint Accreditation for Interprofessional Continuing Education™, the first and only accrediting body in the world to offer the opportunity to be simultaneously accredited to provide CE activities for multiple healthcare professions through a single, unified application process, fee structure, and set of accreditation standards. To date, seven additional professions have joined Joint Accreditation: athletic trainers, dentists, dieticians, optometrists, physician associates/physician assistants (PAs), psychologists, and social workers. With this expansion, jointly accredited organisations can choose to offer IPCE for up to ten professions without needing to attain separate accreditations. Jointly accredited providers are able to offer education that is designed for single professions, multiple professions, and interprofessional teams, as long as 25% of the education is interprofessional. This innovation facilitates and incentivises IPCE which leads to improved healthcare delivery and better patient outcomes. To effectively integrate interprofessional collaborative practice throughout healthcare systems across the world, IPCE needs to become an integral part of lifelong learning for all health professions. There are several jointly accredited organisations that operate outside of the USA, and interest in Joint Accreditation and IPCE continues to grow.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21614083.2022.2146372

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some accreditation programs provide continuing learning to further support diagnostic safety, such as the Joint Accreditation for Interprofessional Continuing Education.

    “Therefore, some accreditation programs provide continuing learning to further support diagnostic safety, such as the Joint Accreditation for Interprofessional Continuing Education [355].”

    From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [355]

    The Introduction (page not provided) identifies Joint Accreditation for Interprofessional Continuing Education as an accrediting body through which providers offer continuing education, and links that education to healthcare quality and safety. It does not specifically address diagnostic safety, so the claim's narrower purpose is not established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Regnier, K., Travlos, D. V., Pace, D., Powell, S., & Hunt, A.
Affiliations
  • Executive Vice President, Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education, USA
  • Assistant Executive Director and Director, CPE Provider Accreditation, Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education, USA
  • Vice President of Education and Research and Chief Strategy Officer, American Academy of Physician Associates, USA
  • Manager of Accreditation Services, Association of Regulatory Boards of Optometry/Council on Optometric Practitioner Education, USA
  • Former Senior Manager of Professional Development, Board of Certification for the Athletic Trainer, USA
Corresponding author
Regnier, Kathleen
Venue
Journal of European CME
Published
2022-11-15
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
2146372-2146372
ISSN
2161-4083 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4309187483
Cited by
10
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of European CME (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
article
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Keywords
accreditation, interprofessional collaborative practice, team-based care, interprofessional education, health professions, lifelong learning, healthcare quality and safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review