Cited by 17Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Prevalence of Low Scores in Children and Adolescents on the Test of Verbal Conceptualization and Fluency

Brooks, Brian L., Iverson, Grant L., Koushik, Nikhil S., Mazur-Mosiewicz, Anya, Horton, Arthur MacNeill, Reynolds, Cecil R.·2013·Applied Neuropsychology: Child

Abstract

It is important to consider the prevalence of low scores when administering a battery of psychological tests. Understanding the prevalence of low scores is important for minimizing false-positive diagnoses of cognitive deficits in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to expand the literature on base rates for use in children and adolescents. Participants were 408 healthy children and adolescents (M(age) = 13.1 years, SD = 3.7) and 139 children and adolescents (M(age) = 12.4 years, SD = 3.1) diagnosed with a medical, neurological, or learning condition. All participants were administered the Test of Verbal Conceptualization and Fluency (TVCF; Reynolds & Horton, 2006 ). The clinical sample performed significantly lower compared with the healthy control participants on three of the five TVCF scores. When all scores were considered simultaneously, 38% of healthy children obtained one or more scores below the 16th percentile and 15% had one or more scores in the 5th percentile or lower. By comparison, significantly higher proportions of children in the clinical sample had low scores below each of the five cutoffs (i.e., 63% had one or more test scores below the 16th percentile and 37% had one or more scores in the 5th percentile or lower). Our findings illustrate the importance of considering the prevalence of low TVCF scores in everyday clinical practice with children and adolescents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21622965.2012.742792

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Brooks, B. L., Iverson, G. L., Koushik, N. S., Mazur-Mosiewicz, A., Horton, A. M., & Reynolds, C. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Alberta Children's Hospital (CA)
  • Alberta Children's Hospital
  • Psychology Associates of Maryland, LLC
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Brooks, Brian L.
Venue
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Published
2012-12-05
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
70-77
ISSN
  • 2162-2965 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-2973
OpenAlex
W1977759249
Cited by
17
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Neuropsychology Child (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Academy of Neuropsychology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
base rates, false-positive diagnosis, cognitive impairment, children and adolescents, healthy children, clinical samples, neuropsychological assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Humans, Language Tests, Nervous System Diseases, Neuropsychological Tests, Reference Values, Prevalence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review