Cited by 8Sleep and related disordersFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Polysomnographic and multiple sleep latency testing data in a large sample of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and their relationship with subjective scores.

Tobback, Els, Mariman, An N., Hanoulle, Ignace P., Delesie, Liesbeth M., Vogelaers, Dirk P., Pevernagie, Dirk A.·2016·Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior

Abstract

Background: Despite the majority of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) complaining about sleep disturbances and/or non-refreshing sleep, abnormalities in objective sleep parameters have not consistently been identified in this population. Purpose: To assess objective parameters of sleep and sleepiness in a large sample of patients with CFS and their relationship with the subjective dimensions of mental and physical health, sleep quality, daytime sleepiness and fatigue. Methods: Objective sleep parameters were derived from polysomnography (PSG) and multiple sleep latency testing (MSLT). Subjective scores for mental and physical health, sleep quality, daytime sleepiness and fatigue were based on validated, self-report questionnaires. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was performed to predict sleepiness, global quality of sleep and fatigue. Results: PSG in 184 CFS patients indicated decreased total sleep time and sleep efficiency as well as increased sleep latency and waking after sleep onset. Only a few modest but significant correlations (r’s < .30) were found between objective parameters of sleep and sleepiness and subjective scores for health, sleep quality and fatigue. Conclusions: Objective sleep parameters indicated poor sleep in CFS, suggesting an insomnia phenotype, but with only modest associations to subjective scores of mental and physical health, sleep quality, daytime sleepiness and fatigue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21641846.2015.1106176

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tobback, E., Mariman, A. N., Hanoulle, I. P., Delesie, L. M., Vogelaers, D. P., & Pevernagie, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Tobback, Els
Venue
Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior
Published
2015-11-16
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
94-103
ISSN
  • 2164-1846 (ISSN-L)
  • 2164-1862
OpenAlex
W2285197567
Cited by
8
References
28
Citations by year
2023: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Fatigue Biomedicine Health & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
chronic fatigue syndrome, sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, fatigue, sleep efficiency, sleep latency, total sleep time, insomnia phenotypes, self-rated health, polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review