The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Applying critical discursive psychology to health psychology research: a practical guide
Open accessAbstract
This paper outlines a qualitative methodological approach called Critical Discursive Psychology (CDP), considering its applicability to health psychology research. As applied to health psychology, the growth of discursive methodologies within the discipline tends to be located within a critical health psychology approach where CDP and others enable a consideration of how wider societal discourses shape understandings and experiences of health and illness. Despite the increasing usage of CDP as a methodology, little has been written on the practical application of the method to date, with papers instead focusing on the theoretical underpinnings of a CDP approach. This paper seeks to address that gap and offers a step by step guide to the key principles and analytic stages of CDP before giving a worked example of CDP applied to a health topic, in this case 'baby-led weaning' (BLW). As we discuss, a key strength of CDP, particularly in relation to health psychology, is in its attempts to understand both macro and micro levels of data analysis. By doing so it offers a nuanced and richer understanding of how particular health topics are working within context. Therefore, CDP is a readily applicable analytic approach to contested and complicated topic areas within health research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These interactions and sequences unfold in historical and social domains (Locke & Budds, 2020), and identities are fl uid depending on the context in which they are employed (Edley, 2001b).”
From Quality Criteria: General and Specific Guidelines for Qualitative Approaches in Psychology Research. A Concise Guide for Novice Researchers and Reviewers (2024) · cites this paper as Locke & Budds, 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Discursive Psychology: Theory, Method and Applications
Wiggins, S. (2017) · doi:10.4135/9781473983335 · Cited by 314
Script Formulations: An Analysis of Event Descriptions in Conversation
Edwards, D. (1994) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x94133001 · Cited by 284
Research works printed but not linked: 53
- 10.4135/9781848607927.n6 · DOI
- Badinter E., 2012, The conflict: How modern motherhood undermines the status of women
- Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions: Studies in rhetorical psychology (pp. 99–109). London: Sage.
- Billig M., 1996, Arguing and Thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology
- 10.1177/0957926599010004005 · DOI
- Budds, K. (2013). A critical discursive analysis of ‘older motherhood’ [Unpublished PhD thesis]. University of Huddersfield, UK.
- 10.1177/0959353516639615 · DOI
- Budds K., 2017, Applied qualitative research in psychology, 144
- 10.4324/9781315715421 · DOI
- 10.1177/0959353508098620 · DOI
- Crotty M., 1998, The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process
- 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x · DOI · Paper page
- Edley N., 2001, Discourse as data: A guide to analysis, 189
- 10.1177/0959353501011004002 · DOI
- Edwards D., 1997, Discourse and cognition, 10.4135/9781446221785 · DOI
- 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_01 · DOI
- Edwards D., 1992, Discursive psychology
- Foucault M., 1978, The history of sexuality, Volume 1
- 10.1177/053901847101000201 · DOI
- 10.1016/0378-2166(90)90096-V · DOI
- Gill R., 1996, Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences, 141
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1298(199709)7:4<285::AID-CASP407>3.0.CO;2-N · DOI
- Harré R., 2003, The Handbook of discourse analysis, 688
- Hays S., 1996, The cultural contradictions of motherhood
- Jefferson G., 1990, Interaction Competence, 63
- 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef · DOI · Paper page
- Kent A., 2014, The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology, 295
- Kirkham M., 2004, Informed choice in maternity care, 265, 10.5040/9781350393417 · DOI
- 10.1080/13698571003789666 · DOI
- 10.1057/9781137304612 · DOI
- 10.1080/00336297.2004.10491828 · DOI
- 10.1177/1359105309102200 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wsif.2014.10.018 · DOI
- 10.1080/13668803.2016.1252722 · DOI
- Parker I., 1992, Discourse dynamics
- 10.1007/BF00148128 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02085.x · DOI
- Potter J., 1987, Discourse and social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and behaviour
- 10.1007/978-1-137-29105-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Sacks H., 1992, Lectures on conversation, Volumes I and II
- 10.1177/0957926597008002002 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511611841 · DOI
- Sears W., 2001, The attachment parenting book: A commonsense guide to understanding and nurturing your baby
- 10.1177/1359105302007003220 · DOI
- Stanway P., 2005, Breast is best
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000298 · DOI
- 10.1177/0957926598009003005 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00345.x · DOI
- Wetherell M., 2015, Handbook of Critical Psychology, 315
- 10.1037/a0037148 · DOI
- 10.1002/casp.1017 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781526405555.n6 · DOI
- Willig C., 2013, Introducing qualitative research in psychology
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cena, E., Brooks, J., Day, W., Goodman, S., Rousaki, A., Ruby-Granger, V., & Seymour-Smith, S. (2024) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069241282843 · Cited by 49
“These interactions and sequences unfold in historical and social domains (Locke & Budds, 2020), and identities are fl uid depending on the context in which they are employed (Edley, 2001b).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Locke, A., & Budds, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Bradford (GB)
- Leeds Beckett University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Locke, Abigail
- Venue
- Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-01-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 234-247
- ISSN
- 2164-2850 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8114399
- OpenAlex
- W3044150107
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Keele Research Repository (Keele University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Leeds Beckett Repository (Leeds Beckett University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Cultural and political discourse analysis
- Keywords
- critical discursive psychology, health psychology research, qualitative research methodology, critical health psychology, social discourse, baby-led weaning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Applying critical discursive psychology to health psychology research: a practical guide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/21642850.2020.1792307
- The paper
- Locke, A., & Budds, K. (2020). Applying critical discursive psychology to health psychology research: a practical guide. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2020.1792307