The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vaccine hesitancy – a potential threat to the achievements of vaccination programmes in Africa
Open accessAbstract
Vaccination programmes in Africa have made extraordinary progress over the last four decades. Yet, vaccine hesitancy threatens to erode these gains. Vaccine hesitancy is a continuum between vaccine acceptance and refusal. A growing number of people in Africa are delaying or refusing recommended vaccines for themselves or their children, even when safe and effective vaccines are available. This predisposes communities to infectious diseases, resulting in multiple disease outbreaks, ultimately consuming resources and costing lives. Vaccine hesitancy is currently receiving unprecedented global attention, however, there remains several knowledge gaps, particularly in Africa. The vast majority of research on this topic has been conducted in high income countries. Little is therefore known about the nature and causes of vaccine hesitancy in Africa, and evidence-based interventions in the region to address it are also limited. Moreover, tools to measure vaccine hesitancy are scarce, and none that exist have been validated in Africa. We discuss these knowledge gaps, and propose a research and capacity building agenda to better measure and overcome vaccine hesitancy in Africa. Ultimately, this is essential if we hope to enhance and sustain public demand for vaccination and preserve the tremendous achievements of vaccination programmes on the continent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641
Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants
MacDonald, N. E. (2015) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036 · Cited by 5,573 · cited 2×
“countries are challenged by vaccine hesitancy, which represents a continuum between vaccine acceptance and refusal.(7,8) Recently,”
BackgroundLarson, H. J., Jarrett, C., Eckersberger, E., Smith, D. M. D., & Paterson, P. (2014) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.081 · Cited by 2,254
Cited by
Barriers to childhood immunization in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review
Bangura, J. B., Xiao, S., Qiu, D., Ouyang, F., & Chen, L. (2020) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09169-4 · Cited by 340
Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19: could lessons from the past help in divining the future?
Wiysonge, C. S., Ndwandwe, D., Ryan, J., Jaca, A., Batouré, O., Anya, B.-P. M., & Cooper, S. (2022) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2021.1893062 · Cited by 303
Self-citationSamannodi, M. (2021) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s338932 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, S., Betsch, C., Sambala, E. Z., Mchiza, N., & Wiysonge, C. S.
- Venue
- Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-05-22
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2355-2357
- ISSN
- 2164-5515 (ISSN-L)
- 2164-554X
- OpenAlex
- W2795902172
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 3
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vaccine hesitancy – a potential threat to the achievements of vaccination programmes in Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/21645515.2018.1460987
- The paper
- Cooper, S., Betsch, C., Sambala, E. Z., Mchiza, N., & Wiysonge, C. S. (2018). Vaccine hesitancy – a potential threat to the achievements of vaccination programmes in Africa. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1460987
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.