Cited by 8SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Safety and immunogenicity of a modified mRNA-lipid nanoparticle vaccine candidate against COVID-19: Results from a phase 1, dose-escalation study

Open access
Essink, Brandon J., Shapiro, Craig, Isidro, Marie Grace Dawn, Bradley, Paul, Pragalos, Antoinette, Bloch, Mark, Santiaguel, Joel, Frias, Melchor Victor +17 more·2024·Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics

Abstract

This phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation, multi-center study (NCT05477186) assessed the safety and immunogenicity of a booster dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (CV0501) encoding the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 spike protein. Participants aged ≥ 18 years previously vaccinated with ≥ 2 doses of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine received CV0501 doses ranging from 12 to 200 μg. After assessment of safety and immunogenicity of the 12 μg dose in 30 adults, 30 adults ≤ 64 years were randomized to receive either a 3 or 6 μg dose. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were collected for 7 days, unsolicited AEs for 28 days, and serious AEs (SAEs), medically attended AEs (MAAEs), and AEs of special interest (AESIs) until day (D) 181 post-vaccination. Serum neutralizing titers specific to SARS-CoV-2 BA.1, wild-type, Delta, and additional Omicron subvariants were assessed at D1, D15, D29, D91, and D181. Of 180 vaccinated participants (mean age: 49.3 years; 57.8% women), 70.6% had prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Most solicited local (98.1%) and systemic (96.7%) AEs were of mild-to-moderate severity; the most common were injection site pain (57.5%; 33.3-73.3% across groups) and myalgia (36.9%; 13.3-56.7%). Unsolicited AEs were reported by 14.4% (6.7-26.7%) of participants (mild-to-moderate severity in 88.5% of the participants). Three participants (1.7%) reported SAEs, 16.7% (6.7-30.0%) reported MAAEs, and 8.3% (0.0-13.3%) reported AESIs (15 COVID-19 cases), none related to vaccination. Geometric means of serum neutralizing titers increased from baseline to D15 and D29 (dose-dependent), and then decreased over time. The safety and immunogenicity results supported advancement to a phase 2 trial.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21645515.2024.2408863

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Essink, B. J., Shapiro, C., Isidro, M. G. D., Bradley, P., Pragalos, A., Bloch, M., Santiaguel, J., Frias, M. V., Miyakis, S., Alves de Mesquita, M., Berrè, S., Servais, C., Waugh, N., Hoffmann, C., Baba, E., Schönborn-Kellenberger, O., Wolz, O.-O., Koch, S. D., Ganyani, T., Boutet, P., Mann, P., Mueller, S. O., Ramanathan, R., Gaudinski, M. R., & Vanhoutte, N.
Affiliations
  • Velocity Clinical Research (United States) (US)
  • RCA (United States) (US)
  • West Visayas State University (PH)
  • Clinical Trial and Consulting (US)
  • Holdsworth House Medical Practice (AU)
  • University of the Philippines System (PH)
  • De La Salle Medical and Health Sciences Institute (PH)
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
  • CureVac SE
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • CureVac (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Vanhoutte, Nicolas
Venue
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Published
2024-10-18
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
2408863-2408863
ISSN
  • 2164-5515 (ISSN-L)
  • 2164-554X
OpenAlex
W4403545203
Cited by
8
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
mRNA vaccines, COVID-19 vaccines, booster vaccination, lipid nanoparticles, vaccine safety, immunogenicity, neutralizing antibodies, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, dose escalation, adverse events, Omicron subvariants, Delta variant, SARS-CoV-2
MeSH terms
Immunogenicity, Vaccine, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, mRNA Vaccines, Nanovaccines, Adult, Aged, Antibodies, Viral, Female, Humans, Immunization, Secondary, Lipids, Liposomes, Male, Middle Aged, Vaccines, Synthetic, Nanoparticles, Young Adult, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review