Cited by 105SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5

Open access
Tseng, Hung Fu, Ackerson, Bradley K., Bruxvoort, Katia J., Sy, Lina S., Tubert, Julia E., Lee, Gina S., Ku, Jennifer H., Florea, Ana +9 more·2023·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Studies have reported reduced natural SARS-CoV-2 infection- and vaccine-induced neutralization against omicron BA.4/BA.5 compared with earlier omicron subvariants. This test-negative case-control study evaluates mRNA-1273 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against infection and hospitalization with omicron subvariants. The study includes 30,809 SARS-CoV-2 positive and 92,427 SARS-CoV-2 negative individuals aged ≥18 years tested during 1/1/2022-6/30/2022. While 3-dose VE against BA.1 infection is high and wanes slowly, VE against BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5 infection is initially moderate to high (61.0%-90.6% 14-30 days post third dose) and wanes rapidly. The 4-dose VE against infection with BA.2, BA.2.12.1, and BA.4 ranges between 64.3%-75.7%, and is low (30.8%) against BA.5 14-30 days post fourth dose, disappearing beyond 90 days for all subvariants. The 3-dose VE against hospitalization for BA.1, BA.2, and BA.4/BA.5 is 97.5%, 82.0%, and 72.4%, respectively; 4-dose VE against hospitalization for BA.4/BA.5 is 88.5%. Evaluation of the updated bivalent booster is warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-023-35815-7

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of three studies assessing VE against infection/symptomatic disease during both BA.2 and BA.4/BA.5 periods, all showed similar VE estimates or estimates with overlapping 95 % confidence intervals against both subvariants.

    “Of three studies assessing VE against infection/symptomatic disease during both BA.2 and BA.4/BA.5 periods, all showed similar VE estimates or estimates with overlapping 95 % confidence intervals against both subvariants [25,26,31-33].”
  • Eight studies assessed VE of primary series or first booster dose vaccination separately for at least two different Omicron subvariants (six assessed VE of both primary series and booster dose vaccination and two assessed VE of a booster dose only).

    “Eight studies assessed VE of primary series or first booster dose vaccination separately for at least two different Omicron subvariants (six assessed VE of both primary series and booster dose vaccination and two assessed VE of a booster dose only, Tables 1 and 2) [21,24-26,28-33].”
  • Among 4 studies that compared VE against outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or symptomatic COVID-19 disease between BA.1 and BA.2, all showed lower VE against BA.2.

    “Among 4 studies that compared VE against outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or symptomatic COVID-19 disease between BA.1 and BA.2, all showed lower VE against BA.2 [26,29,31,33].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [5]The World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Vol. 2022 (2022).
  2. [30]Link-Gelles R Effectiveness of 2, 3, and 4 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses among immunocompetent adults during periods when SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2/BA.2.12.1 sublineages predominated — VISION Network, 10 States, december 2021–June 2022 MMWR Morbidity Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022 71 931 939 10.15585/mmwr.mm7129e1 PMC9310634 35862287 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [39]Stowe J Andrews N Kirsebom F Ramsay M Bernal JL Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron and Delta hospitalisation, a test negative case-control study Nat. Commun. 2022 13 5736 10.1038/s41467-022-33378-7 36180428 PMC9523190 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tseng, H. F., Ackerson, B. K., Bruxvoort, K. J., Sy, L. S., Tubert, J. E., Lee, G. S., Ku, J. H., Florea, A., Luo, Y., Qiu, S., Choi, S. K., Takhar, H. S., Aragones, M., Paila, Y. D., Chavers, S., Talarico, C. A., & Qian, L.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Tseng, Hung Fu
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2023-01-12
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
189-189
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4315779712
Cited by
105
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 3
FWCI
20.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Moderna, Inc.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
mRNA-1273 vaccine, SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants, vaccine effectiveness, BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4, BA.5, COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, waning immunity, bivalent booster, neutralizing antibodies
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273, Adolescent, Adult, Humans, Vaccination, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review