CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 694

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Health hazards of hexavalent chromium (Cr (VI)) and its microbial reduction

Sharma, Pooja, Singh, Surendra Pratap, Parakh, Sheetal Kishor, Tong, Yen Wah·2022·Bioengineered
DOI 10.1080/21655979.2022.2037273PMC PMC8973695
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21655979.2022.2037273

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 1. Toxicological effects of hexavalent chromium on humans.
Figure 1. Toxicological effects of hexavalent chromium on humans.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2. Hexavalent chromium (Cr (VI) has effects on the ecosystem and human health.
Figure 2. Hexavalent chromium (Cr (VI) has effects on the ecosystem and human health.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3. Toxicological effects of hexavalent chromium on the plant.
Figure 3. Toxicological effects of hexavalent chromium on the plant.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4. Hexavalent chromium (Cr (VI)) biosorption process by microorganisms.
Figure 4. Hexavalent chromium (Cr (VI)) biosorption process by microorganisms.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5. Cr(Ⅵ) detoxification mechanism.
Figure 5. Cr(Ⅵ) detoxification mechanism.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 126

  1. 10.3390/plants9010100 · DOI
  2. 10.1021/acs.est.5b03275 · DOI
  3. Liang J, Huang X, Yan J, et al. A review of the formation of Cr(VI) via Cr(III) oxidation in soils and groundwater. SciTotal Environ. 2021;774:145762.
  4. Kazakis N, Kougias I, Patsialis T. Assessment of flood hazard areas at a regional scale using an index-based approach and analytical hierarchy process: application in Rhodope–Evros region, Greece. SciTotal Environ. 2015;538:555–563.
  5. 10.1073/pnas.0701085104 · DOI
  6. 10.1021/es405118y · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2004.01.011 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/1365-2664.12478 · DOI
  9. 10.1590/S0001-37652009000200009 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s00128-012-0831-4 · DOI
  11. US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). Data summary of the third unregulated contaminant monitoring rule (UCMR 3). EPA 815-S-17-001. Washington: USEPA; 2017.
  12. 10.1002/awwa.1044 · DOI
  13. 10.1021/es0499389 · DOI
  14. Abdulla HM, Kamal EM, and Mohamed AH, et al., 2010. Chromium removal from tannery wastewater using chemical and biological techniques aiming at zero discharge of pollution. In Proceeding of Fifth Scientific Environmental Conference. Zagazig University, Egypt. (pp. 171–183).
  15. 10.1016/S0039-9140(01)00677-4 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/BF00170582 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.126 · DOI
  18. 10.9734/IRJPAC/2016/23315 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/02757540701653350 · DOI
  20. 10.18178/ijesd.2017.8.4.959 · DOI
  21. Stoller M, Sacco O, Vilardi G, et al., 2017. Chromium recovery by membranes for process reuse in the tannery industry. In 15th international conference on environmental science and technology, Rhodes.
  22. Payel S, Sarker M, and Hashem MA, 2018, February. Banana rachis charcoal to remove chromium from tannery wastewater. In 4th International Conference on Civil and Environmental Engineering for Sustainability (IConCEES 2017)4–5 December 2017, Langkawi, Malaysia (pp. 9–11).
  23. 10.1007/s10973-009-0284-0 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106877 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s10653-020-00730-z · DOI
  26. 10.1007/978-981-16-2015-7_10 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04559 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124147 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124353 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124681 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124750 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124835 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126134 · DOI
  34. Shekhawat K, Chatterjee S, Joshi B. Chromium toxicity and its health hazards. Int J Adv Res. 2015;3(7):167–172.
  35. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.10.008 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/s11356-016-7463-x · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s00420-012-0822-0 · DOI
  38. Focardi S, Pepi M, Focardi SE. Microbial reduction of hexavalent chromium as a mechanism of detoxification and possible bioremediation applications. Biodegrad Life Sci. 2013;321–347.
  39. 10.1007/s10534-019-00193-5 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/s00253-020-10533-y · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2001.tb00581.x · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.envint.2005.02.003 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.050 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.eti.2020.101251 · DOI
  45. 10.1155/2018/8031213 · DOI
  46. Ina S. Chromium, an essential nutrient and pollutant: a review. Afr J Pure Appl Chem. 2013;7(9):310–317.
  47. 10.1007/s10311-020-01114-6 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.aninu.2020.03.005 · DOI
  49. 10.1007/s11274-018-2447-2 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.045 · DOI
  51. Li A, Liu B, and He Y, et al. Integrated bacterial and fungal diversity analysis reveals the gut microbial alterations in diarrheic giraffes. Front Microbiol. 2021;2241 12 1–15 .
  52. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.619766 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/B978-0-12-821925-6.00010-1 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105684 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101826 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105547 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101725 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101774 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125518 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125589 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.eti.2021.102182 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.07.012 · DOI
  63. 10.1039/C8CS00493E · DOI
  64. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.117 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.166 · DOI
  66. 10.1007/s11356-013-2230-8 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.11.008 · DOI
  68. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02993 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1016/j.envint.2009.12.001 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.030 · DOI
  71. 10.4172/1948-5948.1000219 · DOI
  72. 10.1155/2018/2568038 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1007/s11274-016-2117-1 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.044 · DOI
  75. Zabochnicka-Świątek M, and Krzywonos M. Potentials of biosorption and bioaccumulation processes for heavy metal removal. Polish J Environ Stud. 2014;23(2 551–561).
  76. 10.1007/978-1-4614-2329-4_2 · DOI
  77. 10.3109/1040841X.2014.974501 · DOI
  78. 10.2166/wst.2019.060 · DOI
  79. Joutey NT, Sayel H, Bahafid W, et al. Mechanisms of hexavalent chromium resistance and removal by microorganisms. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2015;233:45–69.
  80. Javed A. Pollution level analysis in tannery effluents collected from three different cities of Punjab. J Ind Pollut Control Board. 2004 9 3 418–421 .
  81. Devi BD, Thatheyus AJ, Ramya D. Bioremoval of hexavalent chromium, using Pseudomonas fluorescens. J Microbiol Biotechnol Res. 2012;2(5):727–735.
  82. Abhipsa S, Chandraraj K. Enzymatic reduction of hexavalent chromium in bacteria. ENVIS Newslett. 2009;7:2–5.
  83. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00457.x · DOI
  84. 10.1016/j.mib.2005.04.011 · DOI
  85. Thavasi R, Sharma S, and Jayalakshmi S. Evaluation of screening methods for the isolation of biosurfactant producing marine bacteria. J Pet Environ Biotechnol S. 2011;1(2 1–7).
  86. Asira EE. Factors that determine bioremediation of organic compounds in the soil. Acad J Interdiscip Stud. 2013;2(13):125.
  87. Naik MG, Duraphe MD. Review paper on-Parameters affecting bioremediation. Int J Life Sci Pharma Res. 2012;2(3):L77–L80.
  88. Adams GO, Fufeyin PT, Okoro SE, et al. Bioremediation, Biostimulation and Bioaugmention: a Review. Int J Environ Bioremed Biodegrad. 2020;3(1):28–39.
  89. Cases I, and Lorenzo VD. Genetically modified organisms for the environment: stories of success and failure and what we have learned from them International Microbiology . 2005 8(3) 213 .
  90. 10.4061/2011/941810 · DOI
  91. Macaulay BM. Understanding the behaviour of oil-degrading micro-organisms to enhance the microbial remediation of spilled petroleum. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2015;13(1):247–262.
  92. 10.1016/S1002-0160(09)60128-4 · DOI
  93. Singh A. ”Hexavalent Chromium: toxic and genotoxic effects and its bioremediation strategies”. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2021;35(3):27637–27643.
  94. 10.1007/s12275-016-5295-5 · DOI
  95. 10.1038/s41598-020-70473-5 · DOI
  96. 10.3390/ijerph121214985 · DOI
  97. 10.3389/fpls.2017.00778 · DOI
  98. 10.3126/sw.v11i11.8554 · DOI
  99. 10.3390/ijerph17176013 · DOI
  100. 10.1371/journal.pone.0219387 · DOI
  101. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.12.017 · DOI
  102. 10.3923/ajbs.2013.312.321 · DOI
  103. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01450 · DOI
  104. 10.18180/tecciencia.2016.21.11 · DOI
  105. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.205 · DOI
  106. 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103273 · DOI
  107. 10.1007/s13201-012-0062-1 · DOI
  108. 10.1155/2021/7694157 · DOI
  109. 10.1080/10590501.2015.1096883 · DOI · Paper page
  110. 10.1590/S1517-83822014000200028 · DOI
  111. 10.1007/s13205-014-0237-6 · DOI
  112. 10.1002/elsc.200900111 · DOI
  113. Arbanah M, Miradatul NMR, Halim KKH. Utilization of Pleurotus ostreatus in the removal of Cr (VI) from chemical laboratory waste. Int Refreed J Eng Sci. 2013;2(4):29–39.
  114. Chhikara S, Hooda A, Rana L, et al. Chromium (VI) biosorption by immobilized Aspergillus Niger in continuous flow system with special reference to FTIR analysis. J Environ Biol. 2010;31(5):561–566.
  115. 10.1007/s11356-019-05942-0 · DOI
  116. 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.06.040 · DOI
  117. 10.1002/j.1554-7531.2008.tb00351.x · DOI
  118. 10.1038/s41598-017-10160-0 · DOI
  119. 10.1007/s11356-014-3311-z · DOI
  120. Ran ZHAO, Bi WANG, Cai QT, et al. Bioremediation of hexavalent chromium pollution by Sporosarcina saromensis M52 isolated from offshore sediments in Xiamen, China. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. 2016;29(2):127–136.
  121. 10.1016/j.bej.2019.107292 · DOI
  122. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121628 · DOI
  123. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.06.004 · DOI
  124. 10.1016/j.eti.2018.04.007 · DOI
  125. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122257 · DOI
  126. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.12.038 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 694

Metadata

Authors
Sharma, P., Singh, S. P., Parakh, S. K., & Tong, Y. W.
Venue
Bioengineered
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2022-02-14
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
4923-4938
ISSN
  • 2165-5979
  • 2165-5987
DOI
10.1080/21655979.2022.2037273
PMC
PMC8973695
Cited by
694
References
1
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (unspecified)
Funders
National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) programme (NA)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review