The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping the field of Algorithmic Journalism
Open accessAbstract
With software automatically producing texts in natural language from structured data, the evolution of natural language generation (NLG) is changing traditional news production. The paper first addresses the question whether NLG is able to perform the functions of professional journalism on a technical level. A technological potential analysis therefore uncovers the technological limitations and possibilities of NLG, accompanied by an institutional classification following Weischenberg, Malik, and Scholl. Overall, NLG is explained within the framework of algorithmic selection and along its technological functionality. The second part of the paper focuses on the economic potential of NLG in journalism as well as indicating its institutionalization on an organizational level. Thirteen semi-structured interviews with representatives of the most relevant service providers detail the current market situation. Following Heuss, the development of the NLG market is classified into phases. In summary, although the market for NLG in journalism is still at an early stage of market expansion, with only a few providers and journalistic products available, NLG is able to perform tasks of professional journalism at a technical level. The analysis therefore sets the basis to analyze upcoming challenges for journalism research at the intersection of technology and big data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 · Cited by 8,727
Gillespie, T. (2014) · Media Technologies · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9042.003.0013 · Cited by 1,016
Carlson, M. (2015) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2014.976412 · Cited by 542
Cited by
If...Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics
Bucher, T. (2018) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001.0001 · Cited by 1,223
Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: a review
Anantrasirichai, N., & Bull, D. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-021-10039-7 · Cited by 793
Algorithmic Transparency in the News Media
Diakopoulos, N., & Koliska, M. (2017) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2016.1208053 · Cited by 515
To be or not to be algorithm aware: a question of a new digital divide?
Gran, A.-B., Booth, P., & Bucher, T. (2021) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2020.1736124 · Cited by 410
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Goyanes, M., & Durotoye, T. (2024) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2023.2290497 · Cited by 198
Graefe, A., & Bohlken, N. (2020) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v8i3.3019 · Cited by 154
“Automated journalism, sometimes referred to as algorithmic journalism (Dörr, 2016) or robot journalism (Clerwall, 2014), alludes to the method by which algorithms are used to automatically generate news stories from structured, machine-readable data (Graefe, 2016).”
BackgroundAI ‘Everywhere and Nowhere’: Addressing the AI Intelligibility Problem in Public Service Journalism
Jones, B., Jones, R., & Luger, E. (2022) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2022.2145328 · Cited by 84
How (not to) run an AI project in investigative journalism
Fridman, M., Krøvel, R., & Palumbo, F. (2025) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2023.2253797 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Dörr, K. N.
- Venue
- Digital Journalism
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-11-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 700-722
- ISSN
- 2167-0811 (ISSN-L)
- 2167-082X
- OpenAlex
- W2133757815
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 61.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.