Cited by 198Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsEthics and Social Impacts of AIMedia Studies and Communication

A Scholarly Definition of Artificial Intelligence (AI): Advancing AI as a Conceptual Framework in Communication Research

Gil de Zúñiga, Homero, Goyanes, Manuel, Durotoye, Timilehin·2024·Political Communication

Abstract

Research on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in communication research is gaining broader interest. This interdisciplinary interest has yet to be supported by a systematic scholarly definition and by a holistic theoretical framework in communication research. First, combining prior theoretical efforts from diverse disciplines in the social sciences, especially journalism and communication, this study introduces a wide-ranging working AI scholarly definition in communication research as the tangible real-world capability of non-human machines or artificial entities to perform, task solve, communicate, interact, and act logically as it occurs with biological humans. We also propose its theoretical operationalization based on two dimensions: level of performance and level of autonomy, advancing an elementary conceptual framework drawing on AI’s levels of potential actions or performance the AI may accomplish, including 1) performing tasks, 2) taking decisions, and 3) making predictions; as well as AI’s level of autonomy, or the agency results contingent on the degrees of human input, interaction, or supervision involved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10584609.2023.2290497

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MindOS Memory Twin lets users export memories and thoughts into an AI powered companion to look back or collaborate with their Twin using their unique memory of you.

    “Similarly, MindOS Memory Twin 24 lets us export our memories and thoughts into an ' AI powered companion ' , so you can ' look back on any moment or even collaborate with your Twin using their unique memory of you ' .”

    From AI and memory (2024) · cites this paper as [24]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Goyanes, M., & Durotoye, T.
Affiliations
  • Democracy Research Unit, Political Science, College of Law & Public Administration, University of Salamanca, Salamanca
  • Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Political Communication
Published
2023-12-06
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
317-334
ISSN
  • 1058-4609 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-7675
OpenAlex
W4389380302
Cited by
198
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 11
FWCI
18.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Political Communication (publishedVersion)
Funders
Spanish National Research Agency’s Program for the Generation of Knowledge and the Scientific and Technological Strengthening Research + Development
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
Keywords
artificial intelligence, definition of artificial intelligence, conceptual framework, AI autonomy, AI agency, task performance, decision-making, prediction, human-AI interaction, journalism, communication research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review