Cited by 121Media Studies and CommunicationJournalism and Media StudiesMedia and Digital Communication

Journalistic Branding on Twitter: A representative study of Australian journalists’ profile descriptions

Hanusch, Folker, Bruns, Axel·2017·Digital Journalism

Abstract

While journalism scholarship on Twitter has expanded significantly in recent years, journalists’ use of the social networking platform for self-promotion and branding has only recently received attention. Yet, as Twitter is becoming important for journalists to build economic and social capital, journalistic branding is increasingly relevant to study. This article reports the results from a study of 4189 Australian journalists’ Twitter accounts to examine their approaches to self-presentation and branding in their profile information. We find that journalists self-identify primarily through professional characteristics, but a significant number also mix this with personal information. Yet, they are also wary of providing personal information, with one-third including a disclaimer that their views are their own. Whereas only small differences could be found along gender lines, more significant differences existed in terms of whether journalists worked in metropolitan or regional areas and the nature of their employers’ main platform of distribution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21670811.2016.1152161

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Estudios previos han usado el contenido de la biografía de perfil en Twitter para identificar características de los usuarios y clasificarlos.

    “Varios estudios han usado el contenido de la biografía de perfil en Twitter para identificar el campo al que pertenece un académico en Twitter (Vainio & Holmberg, 2017), para clasificar tipos de usuarios según su relación con una protesta política (Santos, 2018), para estudiar el self-branding de periodistas en Twitter a partir de las palabras, links y metadatos de la biografía (Hanusch & Bruns, 2”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanusch, F., & Bruns, A.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Hanusch, Folker
  • Bruns, Axel
Venue
Digital Journalism
Published
2016-03-11
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
26-43
ISSN
  • 2167-0811 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-082X
OpenAlex
W2308958835
Cited by
121
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
41.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Digital Journalism (publishedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council (FT130100703, DP160101211)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
Twitter, journalists, self-presentation, professional identity, personal information disclosure, disclaimers, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review