The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Media and Trust in News: An Experimental Study of the Effect of Facebook on News Story Credibility
Open accessAbstract
People increasingly turn to social media to get their daily news updates. Still, we are only beginning to understand how this development affects people’s perceptions of consumed news stories. The article reports on an experiment designed to investigate the effect the distribution of a news story in social media (Facebook) has on news message credibility. A control group was exposed to a news story on an original news website, and treatment groups were exposed to the same news story shared on Facebook. Results demonstrate that distribution via Facebook affects the credibility of the news story. The effect is strongest when politicians are intermediary-senders, and to some extent depend on the party affiliation of intermediary-sender and the social media audience. In the context of fake news, the results are reassuring: people are less trustful of news they consume through social media. However, the results also suggest that social media news sharing can contribute to the long-term decrease in trust in news.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Results from two studies suggest that personal political ideology or political afliation infuences participants' trust in information from social media [5,53].”
From What Do We Mean When We Talk about Trust in Social Media? A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
null (2016) · Philosophy Study · doi:10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · Cited by 28,317
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211 · Cited by 6,767
Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629 · Cited by 5,137
Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao2998 · Cited by 4,160
The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/266350 · Cited by 3,543 · cited 1×
“The more a news source is trusted, the more effective it will be in informing citizens about the relevant information needed to make political choices (Hovland and Weiss 1951; Zaller 1992; Dahl 1998).”
BackgroundVoter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945
Franklin, M. N., Eijk, C. V. D., Evans, D., Fotos, M., Hirczy de Mino, W., Marsh, M., & Wessels, B. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511616884 · Cited by 1,421
Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x · Cited by 1,394
Vallone, R. P., Ross, L. D., & Lepper, M. R. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577 · Cited by 1,241
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Dahl, Robert. 1998. On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Enjolras, Bernard, Rune Karlsen, Kari Steen-Johnsen, and Dag Wollebaek. 2012. Liker – Liker Ikke. Oslo: Cappelen Damm.
- Haugsgjerd, Atle, Rune Karlsen, and Toril Aalberg. 2019. Velgere i Valgkamp: øker Politiske Forskjeller? in Valg og Valgkamp, edited by Johannes Bergh and Bernt Aardal, 81–102. Oslo: Cappelen Damm.
- Newman, Nic, Fletcher, Richard Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, Rasmus, and K. Nielsen. 2020. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
- Newman, Nic, R. Richard Fletcher, A. Kalogeropoulos, D. A. L. Levy, and Rasmus K. Nielsen. 2018. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How do social media influencers induce the urge to buy impulsively? Social commerce context
Shamim, K., Azam, M., & Islam, T. (2023) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103621 · Cited by 163
Σακάς, Δ. Π., Reklitis, D. P., Terzi, M. C., & Vassilakis, C. (2022) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer17040070 · Cited by 75
“Online users receive information from social media platforms with skepticism [14].”
BackgroundRijo, A., & Waldzus, S. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107619 · Cited by 55
Climate change in the UK press: Examining discourse fluctuation over time
Gillings, M., & Dayrell, C. (2023) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amad007 · Cited by 51
‘Normal news is boring’: How young adults encounter and experience news on Instagram and TikTok
Hendrickx, J. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241255955 · Cited by 47
“In the other way around, though, a negative spillover effect was laid bare in the study of Karlsen and Aalberg (2023).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Karlsen, R., & Aalberg, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Karlsen, Rune
- Venue
- Digital Journalism
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-07-21
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 144-160
- ISSN
- 2167-0811 (ISSN-L)
- 2167-082X
- OpenAlex
- W3189018750
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 22.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Digital Journalism (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Research Council of Norway (249687)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
- Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
- Keywords
- social media, Facebook, news credibility, trust in news, news sharing, politicians, political affiliation, fake news, news consumption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
