Cited by 3,543Misinformation and Its ImpactsMemory Processes and InfluencesDeception detection and forensic psychology

The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness

Hovland, Carl I., Weiss, Walter·1951·Public Opinion Quarterly

Abstract

In a new test of the process of forgetting, the authors found that subjects, at the time of exposure, discounted material from “untrustworthy” sources. In time, however, the subjects tended to disassociate the content and the source with the result that the original scepticism faded and the “untrustworthy” material was accepted. Lies, in fact, seemed to be remembered better than truths.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/266350

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Public Opinion Quarterly
Published
1951
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
635
ISSN
0033-362X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120061261
Cited by
3,543
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 302 · 2025: 216 · 2024: 217 · 2023: 209 · 2022: 201 · 2021: 181 · 2020: 203 · 2019: 145 · 2018: 129 · 2017: 137 · 2016: 115 · 2015: 128 · 2014: 128 · 2013: 115 · 2012: 110
FWCI
25.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Public Opinion Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
source credibility, communication effectiveness, forgetting, memory retention, trustworthiness, skepticism, persuasion, misinformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review