CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 178Communication and COVID-19 ImpactNews Media Framing and Political CommunicationMisinformation and Its Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

News Avoidance during the Covid-19 Crisis: Understanding Information Overload

Open access
de Bruin, Kiki, de Haan, Yael, Vliegenthart, Rens, Kruikemeier, Sanne, Boukes, Mark·2021·Digital Journalism
DOI 10.1080/21670811.2021.1957967
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study investigates the degree of news avoidance during the first months of the Covid-19 pandemic in the Netherlands. Based on two panel surveys conducted in the period April–June 2020, this study shows that the increased presence of this behavior, can be explained by negative emotions and feelings the news causes by citizens. Moreover, news avoidance indeed has a positive effect on perceived well-being. These findings point to an acting balance for individual news consumers. In a pandemic such as Covid-19 news consumers need to be informed, but avoiding news is sometimes necessary to stay mentally healthy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21670811.2021.1957967

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 10.1080/01972240490507974 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Newman N., 2019, Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019
  3. Newman N., 2017, Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017
  4. Newman N., 2020, Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020
  5. Nielsen R. K., 2020, Navigating the ‘Infodemic’: How People in Six Countries Access and Rate News and Information about Coronavirus
  6. Palmer R., 2020, International Journal of Communication, 14, 1634
  7. Zillmann D., 1991, Responding to the Screen: Reception and Reaction Processes, 103

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–178 of 178

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
de Bruin, K., de Haan, Y., Vliegenthart, R., Kruikemeier, S., & Boukes, M.
Affiliations
  • Research Group Journalism, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
ORCID
Venue
Digital Journalism
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2021-08-06
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
1286-1302
ISSN
  • 2167-0811 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-082X
DOI
10.1080/21670811.2021.1957967
OpenAlex
W3187445336
Cited by
161
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 5
FWCI
34.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Digital Journalism (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
news avoidance, COVID-19 pandemic, information overload, news consumption, negative emotions, perceived well-being, mental health, news consumers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review