Cited by 54Personal Information Management and User BehaviorCompetitive and Knowledge IntelligenceTechnostress in Professional Settings

The concept of information overload: a review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines

Eppler, Martin J., Mengis, Jeanne·2004·The Information Society

Abstract

Based on literature from the domains of organization science, marketing, accounting, and management information systems, this review article examines the theoretical basis of the information overload discourse and presents an overview of the main definitions, situations, causes, effects, and countermeasures. It analyzes the contributions from the last 30 years to consolidate the existing research in a conceptual framework and to identify future research directions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01972240490507974

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The overwhelming volume of information available can lead to information overload, complicating the decision-making process and potentially causing decision paralysis.

    “However, the overwhelming volume of information available can lead to information overload, complicating the decision-making process and potentially causing decision paralysis (Eppler and Mengis, 2004).”
  • The overload of novel information can lead to cognitive fatigue and a skewed perception of reality due to the selection and amplification of certain types of content.

    “However, the overload of novel information can lead to cognitive fatigue and a skewed perception of reality due to the selection and amplification of certain types of content (Eppler and Mengis, 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J.
Affiliations
Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
Venue
The Information Society
Published
2004-11
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
325-344
ISSN
  • 0197-2243 (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-6537
OpenAlex
W7214214077
Cited by
44
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Information Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
Keywords
information overload, conceptual framework, countermeasures, information management, marketing, accounting, organization science, management information systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review