CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1Race, History, and American SocietyFeminist Theory and Gender StudiesAutobiographical and Biographical Writing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carole Boyce Davies and Claudia Jones: radical Black female subjectivity, mutual comradeship, and alternative epistemology

Burden-Stelly, Charisse·2022·Journal of the African Literature Association
DOI 10.1080/21674736.2022.2067740
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article examines the shared radical Black female subjectivity and practice of mutual comradeship that bind Carole Boyce Davies and Claudia Jones. It argues that their interrelation provides Boyce Davies with unique insight into Jones’s manifold intellectual, theoretical, and political contributions and has allowed Jones to animate and shape Boyce Davies’s approach to preserving and interpreting her legacy. The conclusion considers the ways that Jones and Boyce Davies offer an alternative epistemology that is instructive for scholars who seek to learn from and continue their ethical and political approach to scholar-activism.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21674736.2022.2067740

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1515/9780822390329 · DOI
  2. Boyce Davies, Carole, ed. Claudia Jones: Beyond Containment. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc, 2011.
  3. Davis, Angela. Women, Race, and Class. New York: Vintage Books, 1983 [1981].
  4. Langston, Donna. “The Legacy of Claudia Jones.” Nature, Society, and Thought 2.1 (1989): 79–96.
  5. Lindsey, Lydia. “Black Lives Matter: Grace P. Campbell and Claudia Jones—an Analysis of the Negro Question, Self-Determination, and the Black Belt Thesis.” Africology: Journal of Pan-African Studies 12.9 (2019): 110–43.
  6. McClendon, JohnIII, “Claudia Jones (1915–1964): Political Activist, Black Nationalist, Feminist, Journalist.” In Notable Black Women, Book II, ed. Jessie Carney Smith, 343–6. New York: Gale Research, 1996.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Burden-Stelly, C.
Affiliations
Carleton College (US)
Corresponding author
Burden-Stelly, Charisse
ORCID
Burden-Stelly, Charisse
Venue
Journal of the African Literature Association
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2022-05-04
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
272-285
ISSN
  • 2167-4736 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-4744
DOI
10.1080/21674736.2022.2067740
OpenAlex
W4283383490
Cited by
1
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
correction (2023-12-07)
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the African Literature Association (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Autobiographical and Biographical Writing
Keywords
Claudia Jones, Black feminism, Black female subjectivity, alternative epistemologies, academic activism, Black radicalism, intellectual legacy, African American women writers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review