Cited by 7CAR-T cell therapy researchAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

CAR-T immunotherapy: how will it change treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia and beyond?

Open access
Capitini, Christian M.·2018·Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The recent approval of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells for refractory or second relapse of B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has led to a paradigm shift. Besides being an alternative to chemotherapy and antibody-based approaches, CAR-T cells have become the first successful example of "personalized medicine." AREAS COVERED: In clinical trials, tisagenlecleucel demonstrated higher response rates than prior therapies, and led to durable remissions lasting up to years for some children. Toxicities like cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity, while potentially reversible, have limited usage of CAR-T cells at certified centers with expertise in cellular therapy. Strategies to deal with B-ALL relapse after CAR-T remain an open area of research. EXPERT OPINION: Going forward, improvements will likely be seen in managing the side effects of CAR-T therapy as well as usage of CAR-T cells upfront as a replacement for chemotherapy or allogeneic bone marrow transplant for B-ALL. Further advances will need to reduce the biomanufacturing time needed to generate CAR-T cells as well as develop biomarkers that predict CAR-T persistence and/or toxicities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21678707.2018.1529562

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Capitini, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Capitini, Christian M.
Venue
Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs
Published
2018-10-03
Volume
6
Issue
10
Pages
563-566
ISSN
2167-8707 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2893169522
Cited by
7
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (K08 CA174750, P30 CA014520)
  • National Science Foundation (EAGER CBET-1645123)
  • Stand Up To Cancer (SU2C-AACR-DT1113)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
CAR-T immunotherapy, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, CD19 chimeric antigen receptor, tisagenlecleucel, cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, relapsed/refractory leukemia, personalized medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review