The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The ecology in agroecology
Open accessAbstract
The Ecological Society of America (ESA) celebrated its 100th anniversary at its annual meeting in Baltimore, MD, USA, August 9–14, 2015. It was the normal gala event with multiple plenary sessions ...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Considering the agroecological principle of making appropriate matches between production and the natural productive potential and limitations of the land, a sustainable approach for implementation of more intensive practices is that of ecological intensification.
“Considering the agroecological principle of making appropriate matches between production and the natural productive potential and limitations of the land (Gliessman 2015), a sustainable approach for implementation of more intensive practices is that of ecological intensifi cation (Tittonel 2014).”
From Perspectives on agroecological transition: the case of Guachetá municipality, Colombia (2023) · cites this paper as Gliessman 2015
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredTransition toward sustainable agriculture requires redesign of the systems themselves so that their functionality resembles ecological processes.
“Transition toward sustainable agriculture requires redesign of the systems themselves so that their functionality resembles ecological processes (Gliessman 2015).”
From Perspectives on agroecological transition: the case of Guachetá municipality, Colombia (2023) · cites this paper as Gliessman 2015
In “The ecology in agroecology” (page not available), Gliessman says that understanding how nature works and applying ecological knowledge to agroecosystem design and management is a major step toward sustainability. The passage does not say that sustainable agriculture requires redesigning systems so their functionality resembles ecological processes; that necessary and more specific prescription goes beyond the source. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIf recommendations for land use are followed, a more diversified agricultural landscape and systems could be achieved within Guachetá, in accordance with agroecological principles.
“If the above recommendations for land use are followed, a more diversified agricultural landscape and systems could be achieved within the municipality, in accordance with agroecological principles (Gliessman 2015).”
From Perspectives on agroecological transition: the case of Guachetá municipality, Colombia (2023) · cites this paper as Gliessman 2015
Facilitating transition toward more sustainable food systems requires a holistic systems thinking approach.
“Facilitating transition toward more sustainable food systems requires a holistic systems thinking approach (Gliessman 2015).”
From Perspectives on agroecological transition: the case of Guachetá municipality, Colombia (2023) · cites this paper as Gliessman 2015
A system dependent on a few products is highly vulnerable to external threats and is less resilient in both ecological and economic terms.
“This is problematic because a system dependent on a few products is highly vulnerable to external threats and is less resilient in both ecological and economic terms (Gliessman 2015).”
From Perspectives on agroecological transition: the case of Guachetá municipality, Colombia (2023) · cites this paper as Gliessman 2015
In “The ecology in agroecology” (page unavailable), the paper discusses resilience and adaptation to environmental change, but does not connect dependence on a few products to external threats or to reduced ecological and economic resilience. Searches for the claim’s wording and for diversification, vulnerability, and economic resilience found no passage making that connection. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
This exemplifies the level of dependency on external inputs and the incorporation of agroecosystems into the treadmill of production, which demands continuous purchase of new products to control pests in a cycle where pesticide use gradually increases over time.
“This exemplifies the level of dependency on external inputs and the incorporation of agroecosystems into the treadmill of production, which demands continuous purchase of new products to control pests in a cycle where pesticide use gradually increases over time (Gliessman 2015; Hedlund, Longo, and York 2020).”
From Perspectives on agroecological transition: the case of Guachetá municipality, Colombia (2023) · cites this paper as Gliessman 2015
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mottet, A., Bicksler, A., Lucantoni, D., De Rosa, F., Scherf, B., Scopel, E., López-Ridaura, S., Gemmil-Herren, B., Bezner Kerr, R., Sourisseau, J.-M., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.579154 · Cited by 238
Perspectives on agroecological transition: the case of Guachetá municipality, Colombia
Barrios Latorre, S. A., Sadovska, V., & Chongtham, I. R. (2023) · Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.1080/21683565.2022.2163449 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Gliessman, S.
- Corresponding author
- Gliessman, Steve
- Venue
- Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-11-25
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-2
- ISSN
- 2168-3565 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-3573
- OpenAlex
- W2549591352
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant and soil sciences
- Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
- Keywords
- agroecology, ecology, Ecological Society of America, centenary
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review