The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent advances on biomedical applications of scaffolds in wound healing and dermal tissue engineering
Open accessAbstract
The tissue engineering field has developed in response to the shortcomings related to the replacement of the tissues lost to disease or trauma: donor tissue rejection, chronic inflammation and donor tissue shortages. The driving force behind the tissue engineering is to avoid the mentioned issues by creating the biological substitutes capable of replacing the damaged tissue. This is done by combining the scaffolds, cells and signals in order to create the living, physiological, three-dimensional tissues. A wide variety of skin substitutes are used in the treatment of full-thickness injuries. Substitutes made from skin can harbour the latent viruses, and artificial skin grafts can heal with the extensive scarring, failing to regenerate structures such as glands, nerves and hair follicles. New and practical skin scaffold materials remain to be developed. The current article describes the important information about wound healing scaffolds. The scaffold types which were used in these fields were classified according to the accepted guideline of the biological medicine. Moreover, the present article gave the brief overview on the fundamentals of the tissue engineering, biodegradable polymer properties and their application in skin wound healing. Also, the present review discusses the type of the tissue engineered skin substitutes and modern wound dressings which promote the wound healing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fibrin: A versatile scaffold for tissue engineering applications
Ahmed, T. A. E., Dare, E. V., & Hincke, M. (2008) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2007.0435 · Cited by 994
Bryant, S. J., & Anseth, K. S. (2002) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.1217 · Cited by 845
Cited by
Harugade, A., Sherje, A. P., & Pethe, A. (2023) · Reactive and Functional Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2023.105634 · Cited by 474
Chronic wounds: Current status, available strategies and emerging therapeutic solutions
Las Heras, K., Igartua, M., Santos-Vizcaino, E., & Hernandez, R. M. (2020) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.09.039 · Cited by 370
Gong, Y., Wang, P., Cao, R., Wu, J., Ji, H., Wang, M., Hu, C., Huang, P., & Wang, X. (2023) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c04556 · Cited by 291
Various manufacturing methods and ideal properties of scaffolds for tissue engineering applications
Suamte, L., Tirkey, A., Barman, J., & Jayasekhar Babu, P. (2023) · Smart Materials in Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.smmf.2022.100011 · Cited by 259
Recent advances in tissue engineering scaffolds based on polyurethane and modified polyurethane
Naureen, B., Haseeb, A. S. M. A., Basirun, W. J., & Muhamad, F. (2021) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2020.111228 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Rahmani Del Bakhshayesh, A., Annabi, N., Khalilov, R., Akbarzadeh, A., Samiei, M., Alizadeh, E., Alizadeh-Ghodsi, M., Davaran, S., & Montaseri, A.
- Venue
- Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-07-12
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 691-705
- ISSN
- 2169-1401 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-141X
- OpenAlex
- W2734569568
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent advances on biomedical applications of scaffolds in wound healing and dermal tissue engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/21691401.2017.1349778
- The paper
- Rahmani Del Bakhshayesh, A., Annabi, N., Khalilov, R., Akbarzadeh, A., Samiei, M., Alizadeh, E., Alizadeh-Ghodsi, M., Davaran, S., & Montaseri, A. (2018). Recent advances on biomedical applications of scaffolds in wound healing and dermal tissue engineering. Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2017.1349778
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.