Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 250

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recent advances on biomedical applications of scaffolds in wound healing and dermal tissue engineering

Open access
Rahmani Del Bakhshayesh, Azizeh, Annabi, Nasim, Khalilov, Rovshan, Akbarzadeh, Abolfazl, Samiei, Mohammad, Alizadeh, Effat, Alizadeh-Ghodsi, Mohammadreza, Davaran, Soodabeh, Montaseri, Azadeh·2018·Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology

Abstract

The tissue engineering field has developed in response to the shortcomings related to the replacement of the tissues lost to disease or trauma: donor tissue rejection, chronic inflammation and donor tissue shortages. The driving force behind the tissue engineering is to avoid the mentioned issues by creating the biological substitutes capable of replacing the damaged tissue. This is done by combining the scaffolds, cells and signals in order to create the living, physiological, three-dimensional tissues. A wide variety of skin substitutes are used in the treatment of full-thickness injuries. Substitutes made from skin can harbour the latent viruses, and artificial skin grafts can heal with the extensive scarring, failing to regenerate structures such as glands, nerves and hair follicles. New and practical skin scaffold materials remain to be developed. The current article describes the important information about wound healing scaffolds. The scaffold types which were used in these fields were classified according to the accepted guideline of the biological medicine. Moreover, the present article gave the brief overview on the fundamentals of the tissue engineering, biodegradable polymer properties and their application in skin wound healing. Also, the present review discusses the type of the tissue engineered skin substitutes and modern wound dressings which promote the wound healing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21691401.2017.1349778

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 250

Metadata

Authors
Rahmani Del Bakhshayesh, A., Annabi, N., Khalilov, R., Akbarzadeh, A., Samiei, M., Alizadeh, E., Alizadeh-Ghodsi, M., Davaran, S., & Montaseri, A.
Venue
Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology
Published
2017-07-12
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
691-705
ISSN
  • 2169-1401 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-141X
OpenAlex
W2734569568
Cited by
250
References
2
FWCI
16.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent advances on biomedical applications of scaffolds in wound healing and dermal tissue engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/21691401.2017.1349778
The paper
Rahmani Del Bakhshayesh, A., Annabi, N., Khalilov, R., Akbarzadeh, A., Samiei, M., Alizadeh, E., Alizadeh-Ghodsi, M., Davaran, S., & Montaseri, A. (2018). Recent advances on biomedical applications of scaffolds in wound healing and dermal tissue engineering. Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2017.1349778

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.