Cited by 339SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchAnimal Virus Infections StudiesCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Omicron variant showed lower neutralizing sensitivity than other SARS-CoV-2 variants to immune sera elicited by vaccines after boost

Open access
Ai, Jingwen, Zhang, Haocheng, Zhang, Yi, Lin, Ke, Zhang, Yanliang, Wu, Jing, Wan, Yanming, Huang, Yanfang +14 more·2022·Emerging Microbes & Infections

Abstract

The emerging new VOC B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant has raised serious concerns due to multiple mutations, reported significant immune escape, and unprecedented rapid spreading speed. Currently, studies describing the neutralization ability of different homologous and heterologous booster vaccination against Omicron are still lacking. In this study, we explored the immunogenicity of COVID-19 breakthrough patients, BBIBP-CorV homologous booster group and BBIBP-CorV/ZF2001 heterologous booster group against SARS-CoV-2 pseudotypes corresponding to the prototype, Beta, Delta, and the emergent Omicron variant.Notably, at 14 days post two-dose inactivated vaccines, pVNT titre increased to 67.4 GMTs against prototype, 8.85 against Beta and 35.07 against Delta, while neutralization activity against Omicron was below the lower limit of quantitation in 80% of the samples. At day 14 post BBIBP-CorV homologous booster vaccination, GMTs of pVNT significantly increased to 285.6, 215.7, 250.8, 48.73 against prototype, Beta, Delta, and Omicron, while at day 14 post ZF2001 heterologous booster vaccination, GMTs of pVNT significantly increased to 1436.00, 789.6, 1501.00, 95.86, respectively. Post booster vaccination, 100% samples showed positive neutralization activity against Omicron, albeit illustrated a significant reduction (5.86- to 14.98-fold) of pVNT against Omicron compared to prototype at 14 days after the homologous or heterologous vaccine boosters.Overall, our study demonstrates that vaccine-induced immune protection might more likely be escaped by Omicron compared to prototypes and other VOCs. After two doses of inactivated whole-virion vaccines as the "priming" shot, a third heterologous protein subunit vaccine and a homologous inactivated vaccine booster could improve neutralization against Omicron.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/22221751.2021.2022440

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]Cele S, Jackson L, Khan K, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron has extensive but incomplete escape of Pfizer BNT162b2 elicited neutralization and requires ACE2 for infection. medRxiv. 2021.
  2. [5]Wilhelm A, Widera M, Grikscheit K, et al. Reduced neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant by vaccine sera and monoclonal antibodies. medRxiv. 2021.
  3. [6]Pfizer and BioNTech Provide Update on Omicron Variant. (cited 2021 December 8th). Available from: https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-provide-update-omicron-variant.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ai, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Lin, K., Zhang, Y., Wu, J., Wan, Y., Huang, Y., Song, J., Fu, Z., Wang, H., Guo, J., Jiang, N., Fan, M., Zhou, Y., Zhao, Y., Zhang, Q., Liu, Q., Lv, J., Li, P., Qiu, C., & Zhang, W.
Affiliations
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • Fudan University
  • Gobond Testing Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd
  • Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Qiu, Chao
  • Zhang, Wenhong
Venue
Emerging Microbes & Infections
Published
2022-01-24
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
337-343
ISSN
2222-1751 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200192318
Cited by
339
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 202 · 2021: 3
FWCI
25.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emerging Microbes & Infections (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (82041010, 92169212, 31872744)
  • Shanghai Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Biosafety Emergency Response (20dz2260100)
  • Key Discipline Construction Plan from Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (GWV-10.1-XK01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
Omicron variant, SARS-CoV-2, neutralizing antibodies, BBIBP-CorV, ZF2001, inactivated whole-virion vaccine, subunit vaccine, breakthrough infection, pseudovirus neutralization, Beta variant, Delta variant, vaccine immunogenicity
MeSH terms
Immunogenicity, Vaccine, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Breakthrough Infections, Adult, Antibodies, Viral, Female, Humans, Immune Sera, Immunization, Secondary, Middle Aged, Vaccination, Antibodies, Neutralizing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review