Emphasising sound and meaning: pitch gestures enhance Mandarin lexical tone acquisition
Abstract
Lexical tones – pitches differentiating between word meanings in tonal languages – are particularly difficult for atonal language speakers to learn. To test the hypotheses of embodied cognition and spoken word recognition, we examined whether – and how – gesture could facilitate English speakers' discrimination between Mandarin words differing in lexical tone. Words were learned with gestures conveying tone pitch contours (pitch gestures), gestures conveying word meanings (semantic gestures) or no gestures. The results demonstrated that pitch gestures enhanced English speakers' discrimination between the meanings of Mandarin words differing in tone, whereas semantic gestures hindered their identification of tones in learned words. These findings indicate that the visuospatial features of pitch gestures strengthen the relationship between English speakers' representations of Mandarin lexical tones and word meanings, supporting the predictions of spoken word recognition and embodied cognition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is much research providing empirical support for the role of gestures in L2 learning for aspects such as speech comprehension, word memorization and pronunciation.
“There is much research providing empirical support for the role of gestures in L2 learning for aspects such as speech comprehension [9,10], word memorization [11,12] and pronunciation [13–17].”
From Can grammatical morphemes be taught? Evidence of gestures influencing second language procedural learning in middle childhood (2023) · cites this paper as [10]
Cites
Barsalou, L. W. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 · Cited by 5,936 · cited 5× · see citing works
“These findings are inconsistent with the theories of L2 spoken word recognition (Weber & Broersma, 2013) and embodied cognition (Barsalou, 2008), both of which maintain that visuospatial illustrations of pitch contours conveyed via gesture should enhance lexical tone identification.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe effect of gestures on second language memorisation by young children
Tellier, M. (2008) · Gesture · doi:10.1075/gest.8.2.06tel · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Janzen Ulbricht, N. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0280543 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Morett, L. M., & Chang, L.-Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Morett, Laura M.
- Venue
- Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-05-20
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 347-353
- ISSN
- 2327-3798 (ISSN-L)
- 2327-3801
- OpenAlex
- W2041523705
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language Cognition and Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of California, Santa Cruz
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- lexical tone, Mandarin Chinese, tone acquisition, embodied cognition, spoken word recognition, tone discrimination, second language acquisition, visuospatial representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review