Cited by 45Phonetics and Phonology ResearchNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

Prominence in speech and gesture favour second language novel word learning

Kushch, Olga, Igualada, Alfonso, Prieto, Pilar·2018·Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

Abstract

While recent research has shown that iconic gestures and the so-called pitch gestures (or gestures that mimic melody in speech) favour word learning in a second language, little is known about (a) the potential benefits of beat gestures (or hand gestures that accompany prosodic prominence) for second language novel word learning, and (b) the contribution of prosodic prominence (independently or in combination with gestural prominence) to this effect. This study investigates the effects of prosodic prominence (e.g. focal pitch accent) and visual prominence (e.g. beat gesture) on L2 novel vocabulary learning. In a within-subjects design, 96 Catalan-dominant native speakers were asked to learn 16 Russian words in four conditions, namely the presence or absence of prosodic prominence in speech (L+H* pitch accent) combined with the presence or absence of visual prominence (beat gesture). The results of recall and recognition tasks conducted after a training session showed that the strongest effect corresponded to target words presented with visual prominence together with prosodic prominence; by contrast, the condition involving visual prominence with no prosodic prominence triggered smaller effects than the condition involving prosodic prominence alone. Thus, beat gestures produced naturally (that is, accompanied by focal pitch accent in speech) favour second language vocabulary learning. The results have implications for second language instruction practices and multisensory int…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/23273798.2018.1435894

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Kushch, O., Igualada, A., & Prieto, P.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
  • Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (ES)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Kushch, Olga
Venue
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
Published
2018-02-11
Volume
33
Issue
8
Pages
992-1004
ISSN
  • 2327-3798 (ISSN-L)
  • 2327-3801
OpenAlex
W2789455781
Cited by
45
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Language Cognition and Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (FFI2015-66533-P)
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (2014SGR-925)
  • Agència de Gestió d\ 'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
second language vocabulary acquisition, prosodic prominence, beat gestures, iconic gestures, pitch accent, visual prominence, multisensory integration, working memory, Russian as a second language, Catalan speakers, gesture-speech interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review