Computerization of the Standard Corsi Block-Tapping Task Affects Its Underlying Cognitive Concepts: A Pilot Study
Open accessAbstract
The tablet computer initiates an important step toward computerized administration of neuropsychological tests. Because of its lack of standardization, the Corsi Block-Tapping Task could benefit from advantages inherent to computerization. This task, which requires reproduction of a sequence of movements by tapping blocks as demonstrated by an examiner, is widely used as a representative of visuospatial attention and working memory. The aim was to validate a computerized version of the Corsi Task (e-Corsi) by comparing recall accuracy to that on the standard task. Forty university students (Mage = 22.9 years, SD = 2.7 years; 20 female) performed the standard Corsi Task and the e-Corsi on an iPad 3. Results showed higher accuracy in forward reproduction on the standard Corsi compared with the e-Corsi, whereas backward performance was comparable. These divergent performance patterns on the 2 versions (small-to-medium effect sizes) are explained as a result of motor priming and interference effects. This finding implies that computerization has serious consequences for the cognitive concepts that the Corsi Task is assumed to assess. Hence, whereas the e-Corsi was shown to be useful with respect to administration and registration, these findings also stress the need for reconsideration of the underlying theoretical concepts of this task.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Corsi Block-Tapping Task (CBTT) is designed to assess visuospatial working memory and attention in healthy participants and patients with known or suspected brain damage.
“Corsi block-tapping task (CBTT). This is designed to assess visuospatial working memory and attention in healthy participants and patients with known or suspected brain damage (Corsi, 1972; Claessen et al., 2015).”
From Does Spatial Cognition Emerge in Frontier Models? (2024) · cites this paper as Claessen et al., 2015
Cites
Cortical mechanisms of human imitation
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5449.2526 · Cited by 2,683 · see citing works
Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons
Iacoboni, M. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604 · Cited by 1,606 · see citing works
Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., & Prinz, W. (2000) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1006/brcg.2000.1225 · Cited by 791 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Does Spatial Cognition Emerge in Frontier Models?
Ramakrishnan, S. K., Wijmans, E., Kraehenbuehl, P., & Koltun, V. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.06468
- Authors
- Claessen, M. H. G., van der Ham, I. J. M., & van Zandvoort, M. J. E.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Corresponding author
- Claessen, Michiel H. G.
- Venue
- Applied Neuropsychology: Adult
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-09-25
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 180-188
- ISSN
- 2327-9095 (ISSN-L)
- 2327-9109
- OpenAlex
- W2106672939
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dspace.library.uu.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Applied Neuropsychology Adult (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- I. H. was supported by a Veni grant (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, 451-12-004).
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- Corsi block-tapping task, computerized neuropsychological assessment, visuospatial attention, working memory, sequence reproduction, motor priming, interference effects, iPad
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Cognition, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Female, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Pilot Projects, Psychomotor Performance, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review