Cited by 54Innovation, Technology, and SocietyResearch, Science, and AcademiaInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reconceptualising responsible research and innovation from a Global South perspective

Open access
Wakunuma, Kutoma, Castro, Fabio de, Jiya, Tilimbe, Inigo, Edurne A., Blok, Vincent, Bryce, Vincent·2021·Journal of Responsible Innovation

Abstract

The concept of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) has been developed in the Global North with little reference to what RRI or RRI-like practices mean in the context of the Global South. We discuss the contextual factors driving the emergence of responsible innovation practice and ways in which they can inform efforts to develop an inclusive and global conceptualization of RRI. Findings show that some activities in the Global South are comparable to those of the Global North, although important differences exist in motivations and structures. We go beyond prior framings to propose a reconfigured, inclusive theoretical framework that accounts for trans-regional differences by looking at three cases to illustrate international differences and to demonstrate an RRI continuum. Netherlands represents a more Global North concept of RRI; Malawi a Global South RRI concept and Brazil sits between these two extremes and assimilates RRI concepts from both ends of the continuum.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/23299460.2021.1944736

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 10.1007/s10916-012-9895-2 · DOI
  2. Balee W., 2015, Cultural Forests of the Amazon: A Historical Ecology of People and their Landscapes
  3. 10.1002/9781118551424.ch1 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/978-3-319-17308-5_2 · DOI
  5. 10.4337/9781784718862.00042 · DOI
  6. 10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374 · DOI
  7. 10.3390/su9060971 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1948-7177.2011.00020.x · DOI
  9. 10.1080/23299460.2016.1231396 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/23299460.2019.1653155 · DOI
  11. 10.3390/su9101719 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.pecon.2017.07.004 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/23299460.2019.1603572 · DOI
  14. Gorjestani N., 2004, Indigenous Knowledge: Local Pathways to Global Development – Marketing Five Years of the World Bank Indigenous Knowledge for Development Program, 45
  15. Hahn J., 2014, Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, 10, 9
  16. 10.1080/23299460.2019.1575682 · DOI
  17. 10.3724/SP.J.1440.101007 · DOI
  18. Kamwendo G. H., 2006, Southern African Review Education, 12, 5
  19. 10.3390/su11226248 · DOI
  20. Khumalo N. B., 2017, Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1663
  21. 10.3390/su9050721 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.09.003 · DOI
  23. 10.1080/23299460.2014.922249 · DOI
  24. 10.1017/9781108871044 · DOI
  25. 10.1108/JSTPM-06-2017-0026 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/scipol/scy048 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.10.008 · DOI
  28. Moulaert F., 2014, The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research
  29. 10.1080/23299460.2019.1603569 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/geoj.12056 · DOI
  31. Novaes M. R. G., 2009, Arq Med, 23, 145
  32. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14793.2 · DOI
  33. 10.1787/9870c393-en?format=pdf · DOI
  34. 10.4337/9781784715946.00010 · DOI
  35. 10.1177/0971721820902961 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104491 · DOI
  37. 10.1093/scipol/scaa054 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/s11266-016-9816-y · DOI
  39. 10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2008.su.00008 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/23299460.2019.1603568 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s11948-016-9761-6 · DOI
  42. 10.1080/23299460.2016.1255701 · DOI
  43. 10.1080/09578810500367466 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/978-94-024-1720-3_7 · DOI
  45. 10.4337/9781784718862.00029 · DOI
  46. 10.1007/978-3-319-64834-7_3 · DOI
  47. 10.1186/1746-4269-5-29 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2019.100340 · DOI
  49. 10.1080/23299460.2019.1647087 · DOI
  50. 10.1007/978-3-319-64834-7_6 · DOI
  51. 10.1057/ejis.1995.9 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010 · DOI
  53. 10.3390/su9112045 · DOI
  54. 10.1002/ieam.1989 · DOI
  55. 10.1007/978-3-531-93468-6_2 · DOI
  56. 10.1007/s11229-018-01950-8 · DOI
  57. 10.1007/978-3-030-54286-3_7 · DOI
  58. 10.18174/426783 · DOI
  59. Yin R., 2011, Case Study Research: Design and Methods

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wakunuma, K., Castro, F. D., Jiya, T., Inigo, E. A., Blok, V., & Bryce, V.
Affiliations
  • De Montfort University (GB)
  • CEDLA, University of Amsterdam University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • University of Northampton (GB)
  • Communication, Philosophy & Technology, Wageningen University, The Netherlands
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Wakunuma, Kutoma
Venue
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Published
2021-05-04
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
267-291
ISSN
  • 2329-9037 (ISSN-L)
  • 2329-9460
OpenAlex
W3184418927
Cited by
54
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3
FWCI
11.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Responsible Innovation (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • NECTAR - Northampton Electronic Collection of Thesis and Research (University of Northampton) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Commission (788503)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Keywords
responsible research and innovation, Global South, Global North, contextual factors, cross-national comparison, Malawi, Brazil, Netherlands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review