Cited by 3,834Information Systems Theories and ImplementationQualitative Comparative Analysis ResearchBusiness and Management Studies

Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method

Walsham, G·1995·European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

There has been an increase in recent years in the number of in-depth case studies which focus on human actions and interpretations surrounding the development and use of computer-based information systems (IS). This paper addresses philosophical and theoretical issues concerning the nature of such interpretive case studies, and methodological issues on the conduct and reporting of this type of research. The paper aims to provide a useful reference point for researchers who wish to work in the interpretive tradition, and more generally to encourage careful work on the conceptualisation and execution of case studies in the information systems field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/ejis.1995.9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To minimize salience bias and maintain critical distance, the transcriptions were cross-checked with the second author and a shared meaning was generated through multiple interactions with empirical data, theory, and the emergent coding schema.

    “On the other hand, to minimize salience bias as well as to maintain a critical distance between the personal use of Slack apps and integrations of the researchers and the views of interviewees, we cross-checked the transcriptions with the second author (not an active user of enterprise messengers) and generated a shared meaning through multiple interactions in which we engaged back and forth with”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walsham, G.
Affiliations
Lancaster University (GB)
Corresponding author
Walsham, G
Venue
European Journal of Information Systems
Published
1995-05
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
74-81
ISSN
  • 0960-085X (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-9344
OpenAlex
W2050401924
Cited by
3,834
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 112 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 135 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 166 · 2019: 152 · 2018: 171 · 2017: 155 · 2016: 150 · 2015: 199 · 2014: 249 · 2013: 232 · 2012: 210
FWCI
46.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Information Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Business and Management Studies
Keywords
information systems research methodology, philosophical foundations of research, research reporting, computer-based information systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review