Cited by 33Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationPopulism, Right-Wing MovementsMedia Influence and Politics

19 Things We Learned from the 2016 Election

Open access
Gelman, Andrew, Azari, Julia·2017·Statistics and Public Policy

Abstract

We can all agree that the presidential election result was a shocker. According to news reports, even the Trump campaign team was stunned to come up a winner. So now seems like a good time to go over various theories floating around in political science and political reporting and see where they stand, now that this turbulent political year has drawn to a close. In the present article, we go through several things that we as political observers and political scientists have learned from the election, and then discuss implications for the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/2330443x.2017.1356775

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gelman, A., & Azari, J.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Marquette University (US)
Corresponding author
Gelman, Andrew
Venue
Statistics and Public Policy
Published
2017-01-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
2330-443X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2780924432
Cited by
33
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7
FWCI
18.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Statistics and Public Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
U.S. Department of the Treasury
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
2016 US presidential election, Donald Trump, election results, political theory, political journalism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review