The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prebiotics and Fish Immune Response: A Review of Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives
Abstract
It is now a well-documented fact that there is a distinct relation between fish nutrition and health status. Intensification of aquaculture practice to meet market demand causes stress and elevates the risk of the disease outbreak. Therefore, provisions of proper diets as well as appropriate feeding regimens are of high importance in intensive aquaculture. Considering the negative impacts raised by prophylactic and therapeutic use of antibiotic in aquaculture, administration of dietary immunostimulant has been suggested as an alternative to antimicrobial agents. In this sense, functional dietary supplements, including pre-, pro- and synbiotic received increasing attention as an environment-friendly strategy for improving fish health. During the past years, administration of prebiotics in the diet of different fish species revealed promising results in immune response. In the present review article, the topic of the administration of dietary prebiotics in aquaculture is addressed with a special focus on recent findings regarding the effects of prebiotics on fish immune response and possible mode of action. Furthermore, the present study covers the gap in existing knowledge and suggests issues that merit further investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cani, P. D., Possemiers, S., Van de Wiele, T., Guiot, Y., Everard, A., Rottier, O., Geurts, L., Naslain, D., Neyrinck, A., Lambert, D. M., et al. (2009) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2008.165886 · Cited by 2,518
Emerging molecular insights into the interaction between probiotics and the host intestinal mucosa
Bron, P. A., van Baarlen, P., & Kleerebezem, M. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2690 · Cited by 690
New insight into butyrate metabolism
Knudsen, K. E. B., Serena, A., Canibe, N., & Juntunen, K. S. (2003) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1079/pns2002212 · Cited by 134
Cerezuela, R., Meseguer, J., & Esteban, M. Á. (2013) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2012.12.026 · Cited by 103
Cited by
Recent advances in the role of probiotics and prebiotics in carp aquaculture: A review
Dawood, M. A. O., & Koshio, S. (2016) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.12.033 · Cited by 527
Sustainable aquaculture requires environmental‐friendly treatment strategies for fish diseases
Lieke, T., Meinelt, T., Hoseinifar, S. H., Pan, B., Straus, D. L., & Steinberg, C. E. W. (2020) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12365 · Cited by 363
Self-citationHost-Associated Probiotics: A Key Factor in Sustainable Aquaculture
Van Doan, H., Hoseinifar, S. H., Ringø, E., Ángeles Esteban, M., Dadar, M., Dawood, M. A. O., & Faggio, C. (2020) · Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture · doi:10.1080/23308249.2019.1643288 · Cited by 348
Self-citationThe Application of Single-Cell Ingredients in Aquaculture Feeds—A Review
Glencross, B. D., Huyben, D., & Schrama, J. W. (2020) · Fishes · doi:10.3390/fishes5030022 · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoseinifar, S. H., Esteban, M. Á., Cuesta, A., & Sun, Y.-Z.
- Venue
- Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-07-31
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 315-328
- ISSN
- 2330-8249 (ISSN-L)
- 2330-8257
- OpenAlex
- W2097140327
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prebiotics and Fish Immune Response: A Review of Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/23308249.2015.1052365
- The paper
- Hoseinifar, S. H., Esteban, M. Á., Cuesta, A., & Sun, Y.-Z. (2015). Prebiotics and Fish Immune Response: A Review of Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2015.1052365
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
