Cited by 13EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningEnglish Language Learning and Teaching

The effect of writing exercises in classroom on the production of written sentences at undergraduate level by Saudi EFL learners: A case study of error analysis

Open access
Khan, Afzal·2022·Cogent Education

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the types, and frequency of errors in written sentences by undergraduate Saudi English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners, following a quasi-experimental design. Data were collected from two groups: the control group (CG) and the experimental group (EG) through written sentences. The control group (CG) did not receive the treatment whereas the experimental group (EG) did to show the effect of writing exercises in the classroom on the production of written sentences. The experimental group (EG) received extra 3 hours of teaching and writing practice in a week to show the effect of classroom writing on the production of written sentences. The researcher assigned extra writing exercises in the classroom for the experimental group (EG) from the coursebook (Unlock 1, and 2) for 2 months. The age of the participants ranged from 18 to 25. The findings revealed that both groups committed overall errors with a significantly different frequency such as the control group with 199, whereas the experimental group with 116. Moreover, the control group committed errors in 9 categories out of 11 like “wrong word order”, “wrong use of preposition”, “wrong use of article”, “wrong com-adjectives”, “wrong subject verb-tense”, “faulty capitalization”, “punctuations”, “spelling errors”, and “wrong word choice”. In contrast, the experimental group produced errors only in 7 categories out of 11, and these are, “wrong use of preposition”, “wrong use of article”, “wrong su…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/2331186x.2022.2122259

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 23 · Cited by 13

Authors
Khan, A.
Affiliations
King Saud University (SA)
Corresponding author
Khan, Afzal
Venue
Cogent Education
Published
2022-09-12
Volume
9
Issue
1
ISSN
2331-186X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295540071
Cited by
13
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cogent Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
writing exercises, error analysis, EFL writing, Saudi EFL learners, undergraduate students, writing instruction, preposition errors, article errors, subject-verb agreement, spelling errors, punctuation errors, capitalization errors, word choice errors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review