Cited by 12Reflective Practices in EducationTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An insight into reflective teaching levels of Vietnamese EFL teachers in a premier language center

Open access
Le Thanh Thao, Trut Thuy, Pham, Anh Thi, Nguyen, Hoang Yen, Phuong, Thi Anh Thu, Huynh, Huong Tra, Nguyen·2023·Cogent Education

Abstract

The purpose of this inquiry was to examine the degrees of reflective teaching (RT) amongst English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers working at a private language center in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam, and to provide suggestions for its successful implementation. A mixed-methods approach was employed, integrating a quantitative survey and a qualitative interview. The results evinced that although the majority of participants perceived themselves as being involved in RT practices, their self-reported levels did not consistently correlate with their actual practices. Most teachers were categorized as contextual levels, with only a minor number attaining the dialectical level. In the meantime, a few teachers were classified under the technical level. Demographic information had an insignificant impact. The results imply that supplementary professional development (PD) opportunities could be advantageous for EFL teachers in the area to enhance their RT skills. Despite being conducted in a solitary English language center, the findings of this study may have far-reaching implications for EFL teachers in other developing nations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/2331186x.2023.2243118

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1002/sce.21591 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.system.2010.03.003 · DOI
  3. Amulya, J. (2004). Guide to integrating reflection into field-based courses. Center for Reflective Community Practice.
  4. 10.1080/13664530.2019.1659176 · DOI
  5. Brockbank, A., & McGill, I. (2012). Facilitating reflective learning: Coaching, mentoring and supervision. Kogan Page Publishers.
  6. 10.4324/9781315456539-24 · DOI
  7. 10.4324/9780203946985 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/14664208.2013.780321 · DOI
  9. 10.1525/curh.1933.38.4.441 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/19415257.2013.798741 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/14623943.2011.616687 · DOI
  12. 10.29333/iji.2021.14219a · DOI
  13. 10.1111/jan.13031 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.4324/9781410600523 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/02607476.2014.992634 · DOI
  16. 10.30486/relp.2018.538818 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/1558689815607096 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/elt/ccy030 · DOI
  19. Nguyen, N., Trinh, L., & Vo, B. (2015). Reflection–an effective means of teachers’ professional development. Journal of Science - Can Tho University, 41, 97–101. https://ctujsvn.ctu.edu.vn/index.php/ctujsvn/article/view/2270
  20. 10.1016/j.tate.2017.08.015 · DOI
  21. 10.1017/S0958344021000215 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00019-0 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.intman.2017.10.001 · DOI
  24. Pharis, T. J., Wu, E., Sullivan, S., & Moore, L. (2019). Improving teacher quality: Professional development implications from teacher professional growth and effectiveness system implementation in rural Kentucky high schools. Educational Research Quarterly, 42(3), 29–48. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-1ff5a08cbb
  25. 10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.024 · DOI
  26. Rahimi, A., & Chabok, S. (2013). EFL teachers’ levels of reflective teaching and their conceptions of teaching and learning. Journal of Advanced Social Research, 3(1), 12–29. https://bit.ly/3OhfYnt
  27. 10.1080/00098655.1995.9957248 · DOI
  28. 10.1017/CBO9780511667237 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/01626620.1996.10462843 · DOI
  30. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
  31. Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
  32. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.601 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/14623943.2017.1351353 · DOI
  34. Taggart, G. L., & Wilson, A. P. (2005). Promoting reflective thinking in teachers: 50 action strategies. Corwin Press.
  35. 10.1016/j.jssr.2015.10.001 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/s40636-016-0076-8 · DOI
  37. 10.1080/1354060950010104 · DOI
  38. 10.1109/ICSMC.2009.5345995 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thao, L. T., Trut Thuy, P., Anh Thi, N., Hoang Yen, P., Thi Anh Thu, H., & Huong Tra, N.
Affiliations
  • Can Tho University
  • Nam Can Tho University
Venue
Cogent Education
Published
2023-08-06
Volume
10
Issue
2
ISSN
2331-186X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385613777
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
FWCI
8.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cogent Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
reflective teaching, EFL teachers, teacher professional development, teacher self-assessment, teacher beliefs, Vietnamese EFL teachers, Mekong Delta

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review