Cited by 28Engineering Education and Curriculum DevelopmentProblem and Project Based LearningEducational Technology and Assessment

Competency-based assessment tools for engineering higher education: a case study on complex problem-solving

Open access
Garay-Rondero, Claudia Lizette, Castillo-Paz, Alvaro, Gijón-Rivera, Carlos, Domínguez-Ramírez, Gerardo, Rosales-Torres, Conrado, Oliart-Ros, Alberto·2024·Cogent Education

Abstract

Higher Education faces challenges in providing learning experiences and cultivating competencies in our modern environment. Academic discourse centres on tutoring automation, a complicated educational dilemma in the age of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Artificial Intelligence. Establishing a structured technique for real competency assessments is an early challenge. Therefore, this research develops and implements a structured evaluation process to assess student competencies in complex problem-solving scenarios. The study finds dimensional variation in student performance through statistical analysis of multivariate data from two engineering courses, demonstrating that each evaluation method measures different competencies. Key findings demonstrate that while traditional evaluation methods provide quantitative results, the newly proposed instruments offer a nuanced understanding of student abilities by capturing quantitative and qualitative data. This approach standardises the assessment process and lays the groundwork for developing intelligent tutoring systems to automate and personalise learning. This method may lead to computer-assisted instruction to adapt educational technology for engineering complex problem-solving and other skills. It provides a solid foundation for personalised learning technology assessment methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/2331186x.2024.2392424

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within computer networking, troubleshooting requires diagnostic reasoning and problem-solving beyond procedural skills.

    “Within computer networking, troubleshooting requires diagnostic reasoning and problem-solving beyond procedural skills, aligning closely with competencybased approaches in engineering education (Garay-Rondero et al., 2024).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garay-Rondero, C. L., Castillo-Paz, A., Gijón-Rivera, C., Domínguez-Ramírez, G., Rosales-Torres, C., & Oliart-Ros, A.
Affiliations
  • Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
  • Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, Universidad de las Américas Puebla, San Andrés Cholula, Mexico
Corresponding author
Garay-Rondero, Claudia Lizette
Venue
Cogent Education
Published
2024-09-02
Volume
11
Issue
1
ISSN
2331-186X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402125953
Cited by
28
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 12
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cogent Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
Keywords
competency-based assessment, engineering education, complex problem solving, assessment instruments, intelligent tutoring systems, computer-assisted instruction, personalized learning, automated assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review