Competency-based assessment tools for engineering higher education: a case study on complex problem-solving
Open accessAbstract
Higher Education faces challenges in providing learning experiences and cultivating competencies in our modern environment. Academic discourse centres on tutoring automation, a complicated educational dilemma in the age of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Artificial Intelligence. Establishing a structured technique for real competency assessments is an early challenge. Therefore, this research develops and implements a structured evaluation process to assess student competencies in complex problem-solving scenarios. The study finds dimensional variation in student performance through statistical analysis of multivariate data from two engineering courses, demonstrating that each evaluation method measures different competencies. Key findings demonstrate that while traditional evaluation methods provide quantitative results, the newly proposed instruments offer a nuanced understanding of student abilities by capturing quantitative and qualitative data. This approach standardises the assessment process and lays the groundwork for developing intelligent tutoring systems to automate and personalise learning. This method may lead to computer-assisted instruction to adapt educational technology for engineering complex problem-solving and other skills. It provides a solid foundation for personalised learning technology assessment methods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Within computer networking, troubleshooting requires diagnostic reasoning and problem-solving beyond procedural skills.
“Within computer networking, troubleshooting requires diagnostic reasoning and problem-solving beyond procedural skills, aligning closely with competencybased approaches in engineering education (Garay-Rondero et al., 2024).”
From Beyond Multiple Choice: Measuring Troubleshooting Skills in Networking Courses Using Packet Tracer (2026) · cites this paper as Garay-Rondero et al., 2024
Cites
Sahu, P. (2020) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.7541 · Cited by 2,353 · see citing works
Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: A global perspective
Aristovnik, A., Keržič, D., Ravšelj, D., Tomaževič, N., & Umek, L. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12208438 · Cited by 2,047 · see citing works
Mousavinasab, E., Zarifsanaiey, N., R. Niakan Kalhori, S., Rakhshan, M., Keikha, L., & Ghazi Saeedi, M. (2021) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1558257 · Cited by 605 · see citing works
Feedback loops and the longer-term: towards feedback spirals
Carless, D. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1531108 · Cited by 328 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Nevertheless, various studies validate that the effective utilisation of feedback to enhance the teaching-learning process only assures future success when this developmental process is iterated (Carless, 2019).”
A Systematic Review on AI-based Proctoring Systems: Past, Present and Future
Nigam, A., Pasricha, R., Singh, T., & Churi, P. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10597-x · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Michel-Villarreal, R., & Montesinos, L. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14010083 · Cited by 193 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This allows for more sophisticated and effective ways for assessment to be used in experiential learning and contextualised problem-solving and decision-making situations to develop complex and critical thinking (Salinas-Navarro et al., 2024).”
Quality of Feedback in Higher Education: A Review of Literature
Haughney, K., Wakeman, S., & Hart, L. (2020) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci10030060 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Beyond Multiple Choice: Measuring Troubleshooting Skills in Networking Courses Using Packet Tracer
Zainol, Z., Ahmad, S. A., Harun, N., & Endut, N. A. (2026) · International Journal on e-Learning and Higher Education · doi:10.24191/ijelhe.v21n1.2118 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Garay-Rondero, C. L., Castillo-Paz, A., Gijón-Rivera, C., Domínguez-Ramírez, G., Rosales-Torres, C., & Oliart-Ros, A.
- Affiliations
- Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
- Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, Universidad de las Américas Puebla, San Andrés Cholula, Mexico
- Corresponding author
- Garay-Rondero, Claudia Lizette
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cogent Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2024-09-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2331-186X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4402125953
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 12
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cogent Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
- Keywords
- competency-based assessment, engineering education, complex problem solving, assessment instruments, intelligent tutoring systems, computer-assisted instruction, personalized learning, automated assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review